Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah I've been hearing similar whispers from perhaps mutual sources, but that's been 12 months or so and still nothing :(

Be a nice option if it does come up for ~2k

Would sell a stupid amount of them just on a bang for buck basis.

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ah come on Simon you know that 370 is @ hubs (AMM's inflated Example 1 of 70rwkw inflated figures) and is closer 320rwkw like the 10 similar setups.

Anyways Noel - Why don't you just have an adaptor plate made up for the NEO? People have done it before (copies of the Blitz one).

You might wanna drop a PM to "Adz", owner of the wideboy 32 gts-t/stroker. I know he had at least one made... Perhaps there was a spare or a file you could get it redone from?

That'd work out in overall terms maybe 4-5k cheaper than going v-cam. Obviously v-cam is still better but it's a money for gain type of scenario and how far you going to go. There is always a (fine)line somewhere LOL... I did it too :P

400 was at ammrr's hub dyno with no temp correction. 370 with temp correction mode which brings it in lineball with rollers and is what trent from Status uses. get your facts right. it certaily distroys 320 rwkw set ups thats for sure

Throwing ideas out atm in regard to an engine I am planning. My original idea was to run a 26 head with HKS vcam but if the 25 head with the right springs etc can rev hard enough on hydro lifters it would be a more cost effective option.

WWhat sort of revs have you seen from a hydraulic lifter 25 head. I am thinking i need to get to around 9000 rpm to achieve the desired result.

Mate id suggest you get in contact with Paul at Red R Racing as he sent me a text the other day saying that they have their custom RB26 VCS head sorted. Looks like it may suit your needs perfectly.

Out of curiosity - what mods are required to make NEO head run safely at 9000 rpm? Springs? anything else? 

Is there a possibility for clearence adjusting shims to jump off their positions at revs this high?

Edited by Legionnaire

Ah come on Simon you know that 370 is @ hubs (AMM's inflated Example 1 of 70rwkw inflated figures) and is closer 320rwkw like the 10 similar setups.

That comparison is not fair as the Dynapack hub dyno is using STP correction which also inflates figures. Theres a few dynos on here with the fact they have STP correction turned on blanked out from the dynosheet posted. I dont care but when its convincing people buying turbos to change their decision its a bit wrong IMO.

Examples I have seen are 268rwkw -> 280rwkw, 308rwkw -> 325rwkw etc

That comparison is not fair as the Dynapack hub dyno is using STP correction which also inflates figures. Theres a few dynos on here with the fact they have STP correction turned on blanked out from the dynosheet posted. I dont care but when its convincing people buying turbos to change their decision its a bit wrong IMO.

Examples I have seen are 268rwkw -> 280rwkw, 308rwkw -> 325rwkw etc

Have a look @ all the graphs provided by that same mob. They are ALL in STP :merli: :merli:

he results are claimed incorrectly as rwkw and people are being wrongly mislead by thinking it is rwkw, end of story.

I totally agree RE: convincing people to buy things, or show results and then have it blanked out or claimed as something it's not. It's very wrong, but unfortunately people sometimes don't know better and when you do pull people up on it - they get all stroppy about it :wacko:

Have a look @ all the graphs provided by that same mob. They are ALL in STP :merli: :merli:

he results are claimed incorrectly as rwkw and people are being wrongly mislead by thinking it is rwkw, end of story.

I totally agree RE: convincing people to buy things, or show results and then have it blanked out or claimed as something it's not. It's very wrong, but unfortunately people sometimes don't know better and when you do pull people up on it - they get all stroppy about it :wacko:

maxing out a z32 afm at 5 volts on full load full boost doesnt equate to 320 rwkw does it

Have a look @ all the graphs provided by that same mob. They are ALL in STP :merli: :merli:

he results are claimed incorrectly as rwkw and people are being wrongly mislead by thinking it is rwkw, end of story.

I totally agree RE: convincing people to buy things, or show results and then have it blanked out or claimed as something it's not. It's very wrong, but unfortunately people sometimes don't know better and when you do pull people up on it - they get all stroppy about it :wacko:

As much as I hate to agree with Nazi Nismoid, he would be correct on this one. My car made 410rwkw with STP correction on and 360rwkw on the same tank of fuel on a dyno dynamics roller! But then again I was never it denial that this was going to happen haha :)

and my results are backed up with a fairly stout 132.5mph on the black dyno...

PS. On topic my stock RB25 head is happy revving to a limiter of 8100rpm

Edited by SimonR32

what isn't is making enough power yet? Haha

fineline, missing the context of your post... Are you trying to imply/suggest my motor isn't stock?

Nah mate, It was a sly dig at Nismoids love of all things stock. Speshly when it comes to making big powahhhh,

Ash got the gist of it. (insert tongue poke emoticon here)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're not wrong, but more than a few times I've heard of people running into issues where their injector characterization isn't quite right and that approach works for that specific configuration but once they switch over to a new set they discover a whole bunch of stuff wasn't set up correctly. It's slightly more annoying to reverse engineer the OEM MAF transfer function but you already have the sensor wired up to the factory harness so keeping it around for a few weeks more while you figure out the tune is easy enough. I've seen GM also use a combination of both MAF + MAP in their ECUs before, MAF is for steady state and a calculation of the cylinder VE to correct the base VE table, then in transients it uses that calculated VE + raw MAP to determine cylinder filling somehow.
    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
×
×
  • Create New...