Cams Supersprint Championship

[Risking]

Couldn't agree more. Thats spoken like someone who has been on the receiving end of the shit fight. Oh wait a min........

You have......

[nismoman]

Agree that SV rules are a joke.

"street registered vehicle with unlimited modifications"

Talk about an oxymoron!!!

[R32 Stuart]

Couldn't agree more. Thats spoken like someone who has been on the receiving end of the shit fight. Oh wait a min........

You have......

I am with you on an extra Class ie 6, it would be great to see Superlap cars at more events.

There has to be some control on eligability and classes or there is no point having records or events.

[Snowman]

The problem with introducing a "time attack" class is most of them are only good for 2 laps before they blow up.

Hardly going to make an exciting racing series now is it!

[hrd-hr30]

Well I am pretty out of the loop, like a lot of people I stopped following this in the last year due to random rule changes. But Scehdule F has been ignored for 3 years now so it's not new. Nor was A, B or C followed at the last "national" supersprint (or CAMS classes for that matter).

depends what you mean by CAMS classes. The classes you run in NSW are made by your state panel. They shouldn't be used in a national competition. Last year was the first time the Aus SuperSprint Championship ran to CAMS categories, albeit Race categories. But I do think there should be National speed event rules if they are going to have a national title. Seems like it would be an obvious pre-requisite!

Schedule C would not be followed as its not a Race event. But the scrutes up here check the obvious aspects of A&B.

CAMS categories are a joke.

Super lap categories are an even bigger joke being run under CAMS.

Every open car is realistically a sports sedan but we can't take a sports sedan to WTAC cause the engine is in the wrong spot.......

But sports sedans have limited aero yet WTAC can have anything......

There is no CAMS category it's just made up rules. Being run under a CAMS permit.

SL needs to get onto cams and have type 6 added to logbook "time attack" cars as a recognized vehicle.

Speed Events do not have any formal CAMS categories. Race Events do. Sport Sedans is a race event category. Organisers of Speed events (sprint & supersprints, hillclimbs, autocrosses etc) can make their own classes. And they always have. Autocrosses up here run different classes to sprints, which up here use the race categories and in NSW have their own "made-up" rules which are made by the NSW state panel. Hillclimbs up here run by historic clubs have different classes to hillclimbs run by MGCC. And Superlap have every right to make their own rules too.

Are all unregisteered vehicles at superlap required to have a CAMS logbook?? Or are they turning a blind eye and hoping nothing goes wrong??

There is no CAMS rule requiring unregistered cars at speed events to have a Log Book. As always, event organisers can specify it in their SuppRegs if they so wish, like MGCC do up here for State & National title hillclimbs; OR in the Sporting Regs as is the case for the Aus Supersprint Championship. Maybe this is also the case in NSW Supersprint Championship, and that's where the assumption its a CAMS requirement comes from.

Superlap are well within their rights not to force cars to have log books. And given they are trying to attract OS entrants, it would make no sense at all to do so.