Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

did some double checking of my main bearing clearences today, i was aiming for .002" but after checking twice with plastigauge i had a bit of a mixed result

RB26 with ARP mains and was tunnel bored,

tourque up in three stages then went back thru each bolt and loosened then tightened again in 3 stages again. ARP lube was used

i got .001" on the 1st and 7th journal

and .002" with the rest.

infortunatly i dont have a have an internal mic. to be able to check with out the crank in,

and i did have redline assembly lube on the majority of the bearing,

where do i go from hear?

i was hoping that it was all going to be perfect

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/359394-main-bearing-clearence-differences/
Share on other sites

ahhhh shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

back to the shed tomorrow it is then

elite i think it was you that posted a diagram of this being done just a real simple 2d diagram, i cant find the thread it was in, do u have that picture to put up, if it was u

Edited by ahh 33 s2
  • 2 weeks later...

ok so i been back at it and still a disappointing mixed bag of results, i am yet to speak to the machinest but will head there tomorrow, although its been a very long time since they had it in there possesion, been a very long and slow process this one

this is what i have got,

journal clearence

1 1thou

2 2 thou

3 1.5thou

4 2 thou

5 1.5thou

6 2thou

7 1thou

so as you can see there is a bit of a pattern but why

they way im doing it it 30 pound on all then 50pound on all then finally 70pound

then undo and retighten one by one,

why cant modify be easy

ok so i been back at it and still a disappointing mixed bag of results, i am yet to speak to the machinest but will head there tomorrow, although its been a very long time since they had it in there possesion, been a very long and slow process this one

this is what i have got,

journal clearence

1 1thou

2 2 thou

3 1.5thou

4 2 thou

5 1.5thou

6 2thou

7 1thou

so as you can see there is a bit of a pattern but why

they way im doing it it 30 pound on all then 50pound on all then finally 70pound

then undo and retighten one by one,

why cant modify be easy

Silly question - are you using the appropriate torque order?

Yeh both the crank and journals were machined to match under size bearings, i paid extra for them to do extra checks, as I'm a super novice,

And yes I am tightening in the right sequence,

Will be going to machine shop, see if the keep some record of what the did, or just put em on the spot of what torque they would use

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...