Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im now at that stage where im after a bigger turbo. At the moment im looking at three options

1. HKS 2540 - ive heard that in twin form these arent any better than 2530 on GTRs. Are they a good thing on an RB20DET (internally stock) OR like the GTR should you stick with the 2530.

2.HKS 2835 (internal wastegate type) This is my ideal preference at the moment but not sure if it will have sufficinet clearance on the stock manifold. Dont want to go to aftermarket high mount cause that will mean major revisions to inlet piping.

3. High flow factory by GCG.

Realistically i think i will go for the 2530/2540 , do these match factory oil/water lines or do ther require modification...people claim bolt on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3594-hks-turbos/
Share on other sites

With the turbo comes a Bosch 044 fuel pump, surge tank & Mazda 550cc injectors (13B) with the factory computer re-tuned. Looking for about 220rwkw.

However when budget permits for some internals would like to have some redundancy and be able to get more hp without the need to again change the turbo.

Looking for a strong/ reliable (track days) engine that doesnt make power simply because of huge boost. Needs the tractable for slow 2nd gear corners, ie boost at 3000rpm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3594-hks-turbos/#findComment-59480
Share on other sites

you are then going to need size and a ball bearing center. the hiflow is good for around 450 possibly 500 hp with the right combo. don't hope for much boost below 3500 If you want to make power up high. the stock internals with the right injectors

afm can handel 250 rwkw possibly more with a metal heads gasket . but on the track I would be looking at the 220 you nomiated. for reliability.

cams are another way you can gain some good power around a 260o apexi one seem the way to go you can also get your turbo spooling earlier by doing the heads.

I would be thinking may be a hi flow stage 2 from gcg and use your ecu cams and head work to lower spool times this will make very good power 250 rwkw is very achiveable.

the hks turbo would be good the 2835 is the best one but I have only seen them on cutom manifold. have you considered an exter waste gated turbo and these hold boost better and tend to wok better you can get a custom low mount turbo manifold made to suit.

cheers

meggala

I did quite a bit of rescearch in to this and in the end I threw my arms up and grabbed an rb25 turbo.. I can be very confusing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3594-hks-turbos/#findComment-59485
Share on other sites

AFM, i thought the one std on RB20DET was 80mm unit, the same as 300ZX. Is there any advantage to changing AFMs.

As long as its 0 vacuum at 3000rpm and starting to boost id be happy. GCG offer BB rebuild for $2100. I like the idea of a cammed 2L turbo screaming outing some revs.

On a slightly different note, as far as aftermarket internals, like rods, i know they are stronger, but are they much lighter than balanced shot peened, linished originals. Coming from the old school 427 V8s i have to believe Jap engines require blueprinting even @ 240rwkws if they are going to be truly reliable over a duration longer than a few months.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3594-hks-turbos/#findComment-59551
Share on other sites

The Zed AFM has a higher range ie you won't max out the output of it with greater airflow, but it has less resolution because it's still a 0-5v output.

Jap engines are very well built and balanced, as an example the VG30DETT in the Zed has forged rods and crank, the cranks are factory balanced using mallory metal, and the factory uses 3 grades of std bearings to achieve the best clearances, I would think the RB20 would be built just as well, and if you torch it........by another from a wrecker:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3594-hks-turbos/#findComment-59567
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
...Dont want to go to aftermarket high mount cause that will mean major revisions to inlet piping.

...

lol...how things change... then again some things dont, im still a tight a55 and dont know what im doing.

You must be bored Doughboy... go practice your burnouts so you can run an 11 :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/3594-hks-turbos/#findComment-979405
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate) Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?
    • No. Have only gotten as far as contemplating the task of having to put in the required fairly heavy wiring and fusing to run it (along with the big alternator), and preferring not to. But otherwise, it would be nice to have a little extra freedom as to exactly where the compressor is located and free up some space around the exhaust side of the engine.
    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
    • Bit off topic maybe but has anyone had a crack at one of those aftermarket electric compressors ? Bit of a search came up with one put out by Speedy Air Spares. Looks interesting and looks as if you'd have to run a big arse alternator. Found this out after the fact as my air con compressor packed it in and soon after my alternator ! !
    • Yes. Needs new ports. Usually just achieved by screwing an adapter onto them. Be aware that any AC compressor that hasn't been used in a long time will very likely have dried out seals and will not hold gas. Oh, and obviously you will require a new receiver-dryer also.
×
×
  • Create New...