Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had a hiflow at 250rwkw and it was sometimes pretty hard to drive. Made heaps of boost and came on hard way too early in the rev range. On wet days if you tried to accelerate in 4th from say 70 to 100km/h you'd get wheel spin all the time. Fun but a real PITA, you couldn't always count on controlling it. Not saying all hiflows are like this, but mine was.

Stopping at uphill sets of traffic lights on wet days - just thinking about it used to make me break out in cold sweats. I'd plan my route to avoid having to go through them.

I went to a 3076 with external gate and WMI at 300rwkw and its a totally better vehicle all round. Good reliable steady progressive power. Transformed the car, made it a damn sight easier to live with. So its not called lag, its called control to me!!!

But buying and installing such a turbo takes more effort and $$$$ than one that bolts up to the std dumps etc. It really depends on your end goals and what you want to do with the car long term. Also - if you buy say a hypergear hiflow as an interim step - how easy would it be to resell later and get your $$$ back when you decide to up size??? Simple things like this can help make your build more progressive and easier on the bank account.

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

High flow would still be an option and there are high flows today capable of pumping out very decent numbers, how ever results of high flowed turbos varies depending on turbo work shops whom did it, since you are in UK sending it back n forward is not really practical. GT3076 is a good option, its not going to fit without much headaches and I'm aware of how expensive good mechanics are in UK. Other option is Hypergear atr43 "SS" series, which are very outstanding performers, they would also be the nettest turbo to install with every thing bolt up.

I dont know why people say 3076 is laggy. But then, comparing any turbo to a stock RB25 turbo its laggy.

I thoroughly enjoy driving Lithiums 300kw 3076 .82 R33. The extra "lag" actually makes the car quite nice to drive. Your not constantly making boost without trying haha. But if you want it, its not far away!

Plus.. the turbo spool noise is orgasmic. :blush:

Everything this man said, plus 3076R + external wastegate & 2" screamer = epic symphony of orgasmic turbo spool and ear raping gate.

Best ever. thumbsup.gif

Hi all, sorry for hijacking thread, just want opinions on hypergear atr43 G2 (260rwkw) and atr43 G3 (300rwkw) - anyone driven bothe setups?? What are the differences / opinion? Of course I know that the G2 would come on and die off earlier, BUT i would like to know what are they both like to drive on the street only with some spirited driving - its for a RB25DET NEO on a R34 and I'm deciding which one to get in the future - current mods - full exhaust, FMIC, Nistune, manual Boost controller @12psi, pod in box, NGKs gapped at 0.8mm. Tuner says that for 260rwkw all I need now is a Z32 and turbo - no injectors, dunno if thats true. Fuel pump Walbro GS3442 goin in on the weekend.

cheers

Ron

Hi all, sorry for hijacking thread, just want opinions on hypergear atr43 G2 (260rwkw) and atr43 G3 (300rwkw) - anyone driven bothe setups?? What are the differences / opinion? Of course I know that the G2 would come on and die off earlier, BUT i would like to know what are they both like to drive on the street only with some spirited driving - its for a RB25DET NEO on a R34 and I'm deciding which one to get in the future - current mods - full exhaust, FMIC, Nistune, manual Boost controller @12psi, pod in box, NGKs gapped at 0.8mm. Tuner says that for 260rwkw all I need now is a Z32 and turbo - no injectors, dunno if thats true. Fuel pump Walbro GS3442 goin in on the weekend.

cheers

Ron

Read the hypergear thread, everything you want is in there.

Also, it is known that a 2.5L 6 will make 1 hp per cc of your injectors. Thus 370cc injectors will probably max out at 370hp = 277kw, which would probably result in something like 240rwkw.

GL

so what are most pple running as far as the atr43s are concerned - G2s or G3s etc?? Would be nice to hear from someone whos run both in a street setup - opinions..or the new SS profile

Hi all, sorry for hijacking thread, just want opinions on hypergear atr43 G2 (260rwkw) and atr43 G3 (300rwkw) - anyone driven bothe setups?? What are the differences / opinion? Of course I know that the G2 would come on and die off earlier, BUT i would like to know what are they both like to drive on the street only with some spirited driving - its for a RB25DET NEO on a R34 and I'm deciding which one to get in the future - current mods - full exhaust, FMIC, Nistune, manual Boost controller @12psi, pod in box, NGKs gapped at 0.8mm. Tuner says that for 260rwkw all I need now is a Z32 and turbo - no injectors, dunno if thats true. Fuel pump Walbro GS3442 goin in on the weekend.

cheers

Ron

I was in their test car when he had the SS1 turbo straight after tune. no kidding that felt like a stock turbo with heaps more power. That would be sweet on stock injectors and tuned computer.

man i want that turbo then...havent sat in a gts-t or gt-r with aftermarket turbo, been in a sti with aftermarket turbo, didnt feel that quick, maybe the same as a gtt with 12psi and stage 1 mods, but u have to rev the guts outa those four bangers compared to our straight sixes..

If you get a 3076. Do not get the Nissan 6 bolt housing. It is restrictive and plain garbage. To fit a 3076 with the proper Garrett housing requires:

Spacer plate ( so comp housing doesn't touch manifold)

Extended studs

Lines

Dump pipe

-all this comes with the kit and is not hard to fit up

Only thing you will need to do is get a 4-3 inch reducer and make up a custom intake pipe

It's well worth it

And for response? I'm hitting 18-19psi by 3500 rpm. On the 3076 with .82 rear housing

shit..

im making 20psi by ~5000rpm..

thats with e85, poncams and stempipe manifold

man i want that turbo then...havent sat in a gts-t or gt-r with aftermarket turbo, been in a sti with aftermarket turbo, didnt feel that quick, maybe the same as a gtt with 12psi and stage 1 mods, but u have to rev the guts outa those four bangers compared to our straight sixes..

I think an STi in stock form would give a GTT a fair bit of trouble TBH.

take off / point to point, then yes for sure, if both stock then sti is quicker (cos of AWD??) but not by much, but i think the nissans respond much better to simple mods - even stage 1 mods - the modded sti wasnt all that quick - maybe it was farked, but u do have to rev the guts outa it to feel all the torque.. It was 99 model 4 door. I think EVOs respond better to mods than STis

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Gotta admit, I love the 20b Cosmo.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...