Jump to content
SAU Community

1988-91 Skyline Silhouette GTS SVD Info Required


Recommended Posts

1988-91 Skyline Silhouette GTS SVD Info Required

Hi all,

I'm trying to find out the full specs on the Nissan 1988-91 Skyline Silhouette GTS SVD Car.

I require specs on motors, gearbox, diff, suspension, shocks, coils, swaybars, body, spoilers, trim, wheels ect.

I'm also looking to buy a genuine one.

Can anyone help me.

Steve:burnout:

mate, www.r31skylineclub.com will be able to help. SVD001 has the 001 GTS1, thats right, the 1st one built. are you after GTS1 or GTS2? they have bilstien shocks, i know that much, 140kw, different head/cam/ecu i believe. diff - should be stock lsd. box standard 5spd. 3.7 ratio diff is what manuals come with, so id expect that. all have bodykits and 16" wheels, nice ones. Great seats, more like import than regular aussie interior.

hope that helps mate.

Guest Grizzlor

The GTS1 had 130kW (different camshaft), GTS2 had 140kW (more aggressive cam again, ECU piggyback, extractors, better air filter), both had Bilsteins. GTS1 is a more sports-oriented suspension, GTS2 is a lot more driveable. They both came with LSD, Silhouette interior, GTS1 was manual only, GTS2 had the auto option (DON'T GET AN AUTO GTS2!!!!!) Mild kits came out of the factory, nothing too outlandish. There were only 200 of each car made so are rare. If you CAN find one expect to pay around $10 000 for one in decent nick. www.redbook.com.au has some more in-depth specs (but isn't always comprehensive so be careful).

Hope I could help

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I definitely agree with you there - I never click on content for cars I would never ever be able to get or compete with/against/be seen next to. Seeing a MX5 compete with a FD RX7 will make people upset though, for sure. Even in 2.5L Turbo form which is pretty grass roots. (or at least as grass roots as classic cars can be) Yes we're all classic car owners now.
    • Wonder what the cause is, but here's hoping it's nothing too serious.
    • People don't always want builds that are overly expensive, or have engineering/registration/insurance issues and head aches that come with them Whilst big dollar builds, and complicated stuff is interesting to watch, there is only a tiny % of people who would actually use this information, or have the spare finances to drop on said builds, whereas the buy a cheap(ish) cool car, and make it better, with a average budget, that the average Joe or Jane could achieve will always be a winner in my opinion 
    • Bit of a thread revival, you mentioned wanting a bit more top end before, do you regret not going with the 1.01?
    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
×
×
  • Create New...