Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2000 cc injectors are way overkill.

Let your tuner decide what it needs. They know what they are doing.

Not sure what Marko needs but I am taking this advice and will see what Jim feels he needs to make it work in together. It seems it might be a bit easier for the injectors to work better on the dyno then under more stress on the road maybe??

I'd also rely on the tuner...which Jim is tuning it and what power level are u aiming for?

From memory I think my tuner only hit 65% duty cycle which was impressive

Edited by Marko R1

CRD, we have only spoken about 400awkw ish on pump, E85 ? having the Haltech Flex Fuel Sensor installed just in case I ever get a chance to use it. To be honest I would not be using the E85 for the extra GO, but it seems a good all round fuel for the engine..

Haha , I do not even know what a duty cycle is, I will go and look it up but I would guess it means they are not pushed to the limit :)

just had a look and my guess was right but terminology was a little rocky :)

Seems that it is not a good idea to exceed 80% to 85% duty cycle and if you are at 100% there is no injector control as it is open 100% of the time

Paul, get back to work :)

The world of modifying cars is certainly much different than I expected, I saw alcohol abusing, cigarette puffing, drug taking, tattooed , mullet cut yobbos and thats why I joined but now I am consorting with a bunch of fairy blokes that use their big head, gotta get out of here :/

Off topic

Does it make it over kill to have injectors at , say 55% cycle. Just thinking that you never know what you will do in the future. Does it cause a problem, rough idle or anything like that ??

Edited by TT350GT

With the old wrecks of injectors (Sards, Rochester, whatever else) that was an issue. Today with the ID/Bosch 14V's for example, it's not really an issue.

Look at that. ID 2000's on a pissy 1.8 NA.

Did they install these to prove a point?

Yes. The point being that there isnt any downside to using the larger ID injectors.

Aftermarket Industries stock a new 1650cc bosch injector that is worth a look too. Direct plug-in connector compatability with the RB26 loom, so no cut/solder job.

http://www.aftermarketindustries.com.au/injectors-c49/bosch-1650-p206/

Well I am sceptical of larger than necessary injectors. Being able to control it is one thing, but what about the fuel mixing thoroughly with the incoming air?

What ecu is used in the video? I'm sure bit all ecu's would be able to control such low opening times.

For sure allow some head room, but be realistic about the flow you really need.

At a stoichiometric idle? Which the video wasn't. ...

Going off my wideband they were fine (which I'm sure Brett is referring to in his post). The old wreck Sard 800's were 10 times more grumpy than the ID2000's are.
  • Like 1

I have the Haltech pro R34GTR platinum ECU, I would think it should do the job if we went that way. Just getting my head around injectors, well the best I can in a day or 2 :) haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
×
×
  • Create New...