Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is only one way to go.

Bosch EV14's (Injector Dynamics, X-Spurt) and then pick your flavour. 1000cc,1400cc or 2000cc. None have a downside in the application that you are going to use them. They work fine with PULP/Ethanol fuels. They still work fine a low RPM/Idle. The 1400/2000 will have more headroom than you will (probably) ever need.

Also the new 1400's are stainless and scottynm35 says that's better for running ethanol fuels.

Just pick one and go with it :)

There is one other downside to the bigger injectors.

Transitions from one load cell to the next when the delivered fuel amount is interpolated produce a more inaccurate fuel delivery. I see this in the low end of the RPM scale with my setup especially.

My engine idles at 2.07ms with a 14.7 afr. At cruise in 6th gear/60km/h the injector pulse is only around 2.34ms, again at 14.7 afr. When the ecu load point moves from a single cell across 4 and the MS value is interpolated, I inevitably end up with a value into the low 14's when running open loop.

Closed loop mode resolves this a little but its far from perfect, and granted my old Power FC djetro is the other issue due to its low load point cell resolution.

That is more of a djetro/MAP sensor thing with ITB's as you are going from vac to zero vac just by opening the throttle a touch more.

You can rescale and use tps voltage enrichment to help but you will always have to compromise a bit. The normal power fc doesn't have this issue.

End of the day if your accelerating you want that extra fuel, the timing is more important and is more compromised. I.e if your accelerating though a low rpm, zero vac though the gears with no knock, but come to a typical suburban 90 deg corner, 2nd gear that is up hill it will knock. This rpm zone is also usually 2k at 60klm in top gear and wont knock.

If I were you I would be aiming for high 13's on that enrichment, but you don't have a 2.6 anymore so that extra bit of power will mean fk all to you so you will just be wasting fuel...

If you want to get really anal, you can also drop your base fuel pressure a bit to gain more control at the lower duty cycles, obviously if you have the head room for it. If your at 90% it wont make fk all different to top end running it at 95% max if your aim is to gain more control down low. Its not like any of you are stupid enough to run a wide band close loop while on boost, and even if you did your trim wont come into effect quick enough for a boost spike/overboost anyways. NB if you have 2000cc and only using 45% max inj duty you wont be able to lower base pressure much, you will dribble fuel.

Edited by sucram

I didnt mean interpolation while under acceleration, I mean when maintaining a steady speed and the load cell is interpolated from multiple cells.

Im running 45psi base pressure on the ID1000's. Duty cycle at idle < 2 percent on the MFD.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...