Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good points there Zebra. I'm unsure of the head room in direct injection applications.....something for the future.

If Toyota are serious about the future they need something to complete with the DI turbo engines from Europe. I mean VW makes a 2.0L DI engine for the Gti and it ends up in about 20 models from VW, Seat, Audi, etc.

I can't see why a DI turbo 2.0L can't be made for the FT86 and detuned slightly for use in Rav4, Camry, Levin/corolla, Rukus, Tarago, or anything under 1700kg really.

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Good points there Zebra. I'm unsure of the head room in direct injection applications.....something for the future.

If Toyota are serious about the future they need something to complete with the DI turbo engines from Europe. I mean VW makes a 2.0L DI engine for the Gti and it ends up in about 20 models from VW, Seat, Audi, etc.

I can't see why a DI turbo 2.0L can't be made for the FT86 and detuned slightly for use in Rav4, Camry, Levin/corolla, Rukus, Tarago, or anything under 1700kg really.

Put simply it wouldnt work for toyota. The simple fact that the people buying those toyots's are not the sort of people who would ever really drive a turbo. camry = older people and families. Same sort of people buy the rav4 and corolla.

It would be the wrong engine for the wrong cars that are bought by people who dont drive vehicles with those engines.

Look at the super charged aurion...toyota didnt exactly sell a hell of a lot of those.

More sporty coupes would definitly be the answer

a lot of people who drive rav4's, camry's, etc, don't really give a shit what the motor is. a large portion couldn't tell you what size the motor even was. toyota didn't sell many supercharged aurions for the same reason the supercharged magna/380s were never a bigger seller. lots of power through fwd. being fwd keeps the rev heads out, and the extra cost keeps the grandpa's out (who are the main market of aurions and to a lesser extent 380s). had either one been rwd they would've sold heaps of them.

put simply, a turbo diesel motor in nearly any car will sell well because of the way they drive and the fuel economy. that is the reason why they sell well in small cars and 4wds. the first company to put a diesel into a large car will do very well (provided they put the right engine in).

Territory has TD now, so the Falcon can't be far off. Don't expect to see many (if any) new straight 6 motors coming along, the packaging required does not allow for straight motors nowadays, when v motors are getting to be much more refined nowadays. Would love to hear from the blokes who find this thread funny, I understand you have said it draw attention to how much more knowleadgeable you are than all of us... But I am happy to listen and learn

a lot of people who drive rav4's, camry's, etc, don't really give a shit what the motor is. a large portion couldn't tell you what size the motor even was. toyota didn't sell many supercharged aurions for the same reason the supercharged magna/380s were never a bigger seller. lots of power through fwd. being fwd keeps the rev heads out, and the extra cost keeps the grandpa's out (who are the main market of aurions and to a lesser extent 380s). had either one been rwd they would've sold heaps of them.

put simply, a turbo diesel motor in nearly any car will sell well because of the way they drive and the fuel economy. that is the reason why they sell well in small cars and 4wds. the first company to put a diesel into a large car will do very well (provided they put the right engine in).

Lol my first car was a camry (old one '94, wasn't a brilliant car but better to drive than any of the newer models imo), did not car/know anything about the engine.

Why on earth did toyota and mitsubishi not make those cars awd. I said it at the time of the supercharged aurion too, what were they thinking?! Surely it cannot be THAT much more expensive to develop?

Lol my first car was a camry (old one '94, wasn't a brilliant car but better to drive than any of the newer models imo), did not car/know anything about the engine.

Why on earth did toyota and mitsubishi not make those cars awd. I said it at the time of the supercharged aurion too, what were they thinking?! Surely it cannot be THAT much more expensive to develop?

Probably the same reason they made the new fj cruiser a v6 petrol auto and market it as a take anywhere off-roader...the guys at the top making the decisions have no idea.

a lot of people who drive rav4's, camry's, etc, don't really give a shit what the motor is. a large portion couldn't tell you what size the motor even was. toyota didn't sell many supercharged aurions for the same reason the supercharged magna/380s were never a bigger seller. lots of power through fwd. being fwd keeps the rev heads out, and the extra cost keeps the grandpa's out (who are the main market of aurions and to a lesser extent 380s). had either one been rwd they would've sold heaps of them.

put simply, a turbo diesel motor in nearly any car will sell well because of the way they drive and the fuel economy. that is the reason why they sell well in small cars and 4wds. the first company to put a diesel into a large car will do very well (provided they put the right engine in).

exactly. people will drive it if it fulfills thier requirements. If you f*k it up and end up not appealing to your customers then they wont buy it.

Ill drive a 50cc 1 cyclinder if it has 300 at the ground and delivers it like my skyline does now. As will most people drive a car with whatever motor if it does the job they ask of it.

Put simply it wouldnt work for toyota. The simple fact that the people buying those toyots's are not the sort of people who would ever really drive a turbo. camry = older people and families. Same sort of people buy the rav4 and corolla.

It would be the wrong engine for the wrong cars that are bought by people who dont drive vehicles with those engines.

Look at the super charged aurion...toyota didnt exactly sell a hell of a lot of those.

More sporty coupes would definitly be the answer

I meant that a detuned Toyota engine similar to the 2.0L turbo from VW is not really a TURBO engine....more a torquey small capacity engine with good fuel economy....ala Audi/VW applications. So the people buying them needn't know it was even turbo - just like the VW/Audi customers. It just delivers good torque from a small engine in a larger car.

the engine would be small turbo low revs and the FT86 engine would be larger turbo, more revs ala..Tiguan (125kw) Golf Gti (147kw) vs Golf R (188kw), Audi (199kw)

Edited by simpletool

Lol my first car was a camry (old one '94, wasn't a brilliant car but better to drive than any of the newer models imo), did not car/know anything about the engine.

Why on earth did toyota and mitsubishi not make those cars awd. I said it at the time of the supercharged aurion too, what were they thinking?! Surely it cannot be THAT much more expensive to develop?

mitsubishi did do an awd magna. didn't alter sales much. fwd is cheaper than rwd and awd. awd in a family size car just makes them even heavier as well as increasing the chance of breaking things when given a hard time. for them to develope it for just a sports model would make it much more expensive, especially since they would need to alter the floor pan as well as the whole rear suspension. would add a buttload to the cost of the car.

The AWD basics for the Aurion already exists under the Kluger and Rav, to show just how much that car was hampered, it was only about 4 seconds quicker around Oran Park than the TRD Hilux...

Turbo Diesel is not really as fantastic as people make out at times, the v8 twin td Landcruiser needs to do about 200,000k before you get the $10k extra back, that's before the service and oil costs... Yes the torque is great, and they make it really early, but it is often for a pretty small range generally, they are getting better though

  • 2 weeks later...

Bit of an update to further substantiate this arguement.

New BMW M5- will now be a twin turbo V8 (replacing the atmo V10)

also strong rumours are that the next ferrari hypercar- eg the F40-F50-Enzo lineage- is also rumoured to be twin turbo V8.:cheers:

oh yes, bring on the boost.... :worship:

Edited by jjman

Bit of an update to further substantiate this arguement.

New BMW M5- will now be a twin turbo V8 (replacing the atmo V10)

also strong rumours are that the next ferrari hypercar- eg the F40-F50-Enzo lineage- is also rumoured to be twin turbo V8.:cheers:

oh yes, bring on the boost.... :worship:

Wasn't that brought about due to emission law changes?

Regardless it won't be a power reduction!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How's everyone going? Just a shout-out introducing myself. I'm James, I live on the north side of Brisbane. I bought an R33 that had been left to rot in someone's front yard for 14 years. Apparently, it has immobiliser/fuel issues. Long story short, it's suffering from a seized engine, plus whatever else turns up once it runs. The car is pretty good considering it sat for so long. It pretty much died after being imported. It has a bunch of Jap parts and a full Top Secret body kit. It's painted Fiat Turchese Festival, or aqua blue if you're not French. Another project to throw money at!
    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
×
×
  • Create New...