Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All - As I'm sure some of you have seen in a past thread or two a video was being done by a mate of mine who is trying to do some different things with regards to car film/video etc.

Please take the time to check it out and provide us with any feedback you might have :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361307-gts-r-video-ready-for-viewing/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All - As I'm sure some of you have seen in a past thread or two a video was being done by a mate of mine who is trying to do some different things with regards to car film/video etc.

Please take the time to check it out and provide us with any feedback you might have :)

http://vimeo.com/22464722

That car is mint :thumbsup:

well done mate.

good video. :cheers:

Yeah I know, first run through i didnt notice it as much but the more i watch it the more i notice it. :(

We'd already done two takes of the drive so it wasn't going to get done again.

Will - 5d MkII i believe.

Thanks for the comments so far. More feedback the better. More so surrounding camera technique, what does/doesn't look good and what people do/dont prefer etc.

The camera work was awesome i thought!

no offence - but the audio was abit out.. maybe unoticable to others but, to me when the music goes into transition to when you speak how the volume goes low/high. I think the volume of the backing track is a tad too loud when your not talking, but its spot on while you were..

my thought anyway!

Good production!

The way the music transition in and the volume went right up is a bit annoying.

I noticed the camera going slightly out of focus on your face a couple times.

Besides that it was quite a good watch.

Hey Ash I feel like it needs a shot from outside the car as it drives passed, so you can get a feel for its road presence etc... lots of detail shots but hard to get a feel of how it works as a whole

maybe some sounds of it hitting 8000rpm as you mention... just free rev it with the mic near the exhaust maybe

I know its as much about the owner as the car but feel you need a bit more car

my 2c

Beautiful car!

It is quite nice to put a face to a forum name every now and then :P and a car, that you so often quote about when your spanking teh newbs.

I can kinda see where your going with it, at least one little squirt would have given most viewers the smile they were after.

And although that R34 is an amazing looking car, it seemed odd to me to be sitting there rattling on about you HachR31 and everything about it, yet having the R34 sitting behind you and only showing pop shots of the R31 briefly. And seeing that you have put an incredible amount of effort into making it look better than it did rolling off the Nissan line, it needed the exposure it deserved!

Also, one thing that really catches my attention in a video, is short shots of the car from the exterior driving by. So you can hear it coming towards you and going away etc.

All constructive feedback from me. Hoping thats the kinda thing your after.

Other than that, Nice video!

Cool video Ash!

Aside from the obvious (needs moar car).. i thought it was perhaps a bit light on technical details. I suppose you're probably aiming it at people with not a great deal of car knowledge, but anyone watching a 10 minute video of an R31 probably knows a bit more than your average Joe!

Loved all the stuff about your passion for skylines etc though, that was tops :)

Hey Ash,

Very nice work on the vid.

Biggest thing i found is, the R34 seemed to be more of the center of attention then 31. Every time you and mick were being filmed the 34 was thier, you should realy have put the 32 thier as it is the center of attention.

Also some more wide shots of the car, just got up to the part when u drive the car and thier is probly only one or two decent wide shots of the whole car.

Defently need some action shots agan showing the whole car. im not shore if you take it to calder or track meets but if you do would be a good idea to throw these in as Well.

Hope this helps

brentt

Wow, the car is remarkably... sedate.....to look at anyway... I like your style :thumbsup:

yeah as Nick said more shots of the entire car and a driveby would be good, but eh..good werk.

EDIT

***Love the engine paint colour (I'm jely) but dude, do something about the overflow bottle, like wash it or bleach it even. Better yet spray it black..Oh yeah bodywork is AMAZING!!!***

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...