Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Post outside the wasteland again and I'll ban your arse you muppet.

Sorry Ash, just thought it would be nice to see the full potential of it considering you would of spent a fortune on it. On the track of course. Kind of like the "Jun Supra Video"....

Again, sorry Ash.

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

thought it started off good. R34 in the background with 2 guys talking casually. The R34 GTR took too much attention away from your R31.

Your car should have been in the R34s place.

The vid didnt deliver in that you both talk about how wild it is, but you drove it like a grandma. I could barely hear anything exciting when you drove it.

The video for me didnt show off the paint quality either, which Im sure in real-life would be awasome.

Did you guys compose your own music or purchased royalty-free music or what? Seeing that video has given me motivation to get off my ass and attempt to do something similar but I don't wanna get sued for using licensed music and it aint easy getting descent royalty-free music!

Love your work Ash!

As for the video, you may as well have a line up of a 32 - 33- 34 GTR's then go back to yours(Gts-R) as the pre-cursor to them. Not to mention some track footage of yours with hardcore RPM(limiter/valve bouncing), and the on road stuff(non-hardcore) without the pauses. Basically a gamut of footage and influences that cement the Gts-R as the original platform for the GTR's, and if you have some footage with the original engine of the Gts-R. (Like i said a gamut if you can.)

Current video: 7-8/10 (However i will never give a 10/10, as nothing is truly perfect in this world)

Keep in mind, this is only one opinion.

Love your work Ash!

As for the video, you may as well have a line up of a 32 - 33- 34 GTR's then go back to yours(Gts-R) as the pre-cursor to them. Not to mention some track footage of yours with hardcore RPM(limiter/valve bouncing), and the on road stuff(non-hardcore) without the pauses. Basically a gamut of footage and influences that cement the Gts-R as the original platform for the GTR's, and if you have some footage with the original engine of the Gts-R. (Like i said a gamut if you can.)

Current video: 7-8/10 (However i will never give a 10/10, as nothing is truly perfect in this world)

Keep in mind, this is only one opinion.

But they wernt the orginal platform for the GTR....

Also not the pre-cursor either :thumbsup:

Sorry to hijack the thread R31 Nismoid but i need to know....

In some respects surely it must be???? (as it would have involved things learned from making them that could flow into later cars, at least in a few respects)

And i was implying in a general sense of the word, not specific (eg. You could say that most cars before current modern ones were pre-cursors) :D

amirightorwhat

The GTS-R was just the homologated version of the HR31, there were "GTR" before and after the GTS-R, however for that 2yr period it was the GTS-R.

There was a GTS, GTS-X and GTS-R in the HR31.

Obviously Nissan didn't design the R32 GTR/RB26 overnight however there are certainly similarities carried across, engines are bolt in/bolt out virtually as an example. So certainly some things were kept near the same. Diff was similar in terms of R200 short/long nose etc.

So certainly some was same, and there was certainly lots different.

A HR31 GTS-R is closer to a GTR than a DR30/KP is to a GTR for instance if that's what you mean?

That made me miss my old R31.

The film is very well shot and edited, most people not involved with photography/film-making wouldn't appreciate just how much time goes into simply setting up shots, particularly rig & moving dolly shots. Let alone editing it together so it flows well, then timing for music to come in and sync with video, etc, etc.

As a few others have mentioned, the music was pretty unbalanced compared to the rest of the clip and quite loud. Some more profile shots in the garage would have been good, eg. direct shots of front, side, rear etc. And it would have been good if you'd been able to merge onto a freeway/100 zone so you could give the car a bit of stick, obviously with the location you had to drive pretty sedately. Exterior shots of same would have been nice to hear the car from outside where it's noisiest.

Apart from those nitpicks it's a nice short film of a very clean car. :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...