Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 376
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yeah its shit now, I was apart of the beta testers

Grinding tanks takes for ever they didn't fix an invisibility bug whereby a stationary tank can shoot you and your about 20m away and you still can't see him

I still play it as it is a bit of fun, and load up fraps just in case you need to take a Ss of some tk'er

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361318-world-of-tanks/#findComment-5767079
Share on other sites

It's not a bug as such but I feel the cammo and spotting system could use a fair bit of work. There does also seem to be an issue with some people having tanks disappear when they shouldn't. I have not had that.

I love the guys sitting in heavy tanks or tanks 2-3 tiers above mine and they say 'go scout' why don't you go scout, I'll just be finding that there is a guy, somewhere, that can 1-shot me. Somehow I manage to never be the top tier tank.

Edited by DivHunter
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361318-world-of-tanks/#findComment-5767329
Share on other sites

Ah and how long have you been playing, 1 weekend trust me its a bug

People having tanks disappear is due to radio range, if your radio only goes say 300m and your teamate goes further then they will disappear

I am aware of radio range and how it works, there are a small amount of people that both know how the spotting system works and have experienced tanks out in the open inside a very short range disappearing without cover. Most reports of invisible tanks are just due to not understanding how the system works.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361318-world-of-tanks/#findComment-5767379
Share on other sites

well give it some time dude i don't mean to sound harsh to you

me and my old man have been playing for sometime now maybe 10 months they didn't used to be invisible but once patch borked the spotting system and TD's seem to be the most effected

Group: Beta Testers

Active Posts: 38 (0.18 per day)

Joined: 15-September 10

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361318-world-of-tanks/#findComment-5767764
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...