Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 376
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

[quote name=ClutchBurndout-:(' timestamp='1305769292' post='5820370]

lol, every match we got abused

wallet warriors!

skill less fags

etc

i just lol as i destroy and turret dock them

Yeah but you are without skill and a fag, but that was before the Lowe.

Sorry to hi-jack but if you guys are into tanks and stuff, you should check out Battleground Europe. Easily the most satisfying game ive played yet, its an FPS MMO; Axis vs allies WW2 game where you can go on 4 hour long bombing raids (the map is hundreds of kms square), dogfights, to insane tank battles and infantry firefights (play as soldier, tank, artillery, ship, plane). Crap graphics for this day and age, but the gameplay makes up for that. And the map is one massive continuous battle that wages on for weeks. Ill get back into it when they update the tanks and anti-tank guns.:geek:

http://www.battlegroundeurope.com/

I'm still working my way to a KV. They're so damned tough, and that 150mm gun flattens everything.

until you miss...and a medium out drives your turret and plinks you to death. Like I did to a Lowe, hesomad. Except my T-44 doesn't plink as it has a 122mm.

The KV with the 107 is pretty great, you don't get to be top of tier quite as much it seems, but when you do, hello top gun.

me and a clan mate have started to play like this

and yes we were playing that music of teamspeak while rushing in :P

its an awesome strat as even tho we die most time we make most of the enemy team go back to base thus giving the rest of the team an advantage

Edited by Damit

Ok so I got the game, but I can't seem to see any of my team mates' tanks. The little green dot appears but I can't see them even when I'm right next to them (for example at start up).

Enemy tanks I can see no problem (which usually results in me getting 1 shot KOed), but none of my teammate tanks appear even when I'm dead & just speculating?

Graphic glitch?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...