Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 376
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Last night during one match somehow two tier 1 tanks made it into our team during one of the battles (suppose to be tier 7 - 9)... :glare:

& as I guessed the douche driving the tier 1 German tank started acting like an A-hole & kept on ramming into me so I can't move.

Someone else on the team saw this & fired a warning shot at him, he stopped but proceeded to shot at that person (obviously no effect with his lvl 1 gun vs a lvl 8 heavy tank :laugh: ).

Meanwhile I just took the time & 1 shot KOed him.

Got a -1 score but f**k it, feels good. :closedeyes:

But this is what I find these whining A-holes do now more often, they don't shoot you, but will just keep driving into you & causing you to get stuck. & since they haven't fired at you, if you just kill them you get a -1.

I find you are more likely to run into these kunts in the low tier battles (always driving some stock tier 1 tank) when I'm using my tier 2 premium compared to using the Lowe.

Edited by Mayuri Krab
  • 2 weeks later...

Well they were reverted in a patch anyway, do you miss them?

Been playing too many tanks lines as usual. I now have enough slots to have 1 of every line in the game + 2 premiums. About half way to the Pershing and T32, 2/3 to the Panther and 1/3 to the IS-7. Not sure I want an IS-7 but with the locking of tanks coming for clan wars I will need more than on tier 10. IS-7, IS-4 and T30 should do, I think the Maus will be too slow for me.

IS-7 looks funny with that little machine gun stuck on its head... :whistling:

In other news, I just renewed another month of premium account to grind my way to the German metal shoe box (Manus), at Tiger atm... stock Tiger is POS to use. :glare:

I unlocked the Tiger II last night, best tier 8 heavy.

Soo... much better than Tiger?

I'm currently sick off grinding it :rant:, might just end up farming xp using my Lowe/Kv-5 & convert the xp to get to Tiger II instead.

Soo... much better than Tiger?

I'm currently sick off grinding it :rant:, might just end up farming xp using my Lowe/Kv-5 & convert the xp to get to Tiger II instead.

It's better than the T32 and the IS-3 so yeah, it is much better than the Tiger. With all the upgrades the only drawbacks are 27k/h top speed and vulnerable lower glacis (like every tank).

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...