Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I like your commrade's name, DucksNuts :yes:

EDIT: Also IS-7 researched before 7.3, woot!

Nice, I'm trying to get enough credits together to buy an is4 before the patch, without selling any other tanks. 1 million credits to go lol

  • Replies 376
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I've seen worse.

I will see if I can find the screenshot of the one I had with 12 tanks - well if you want to call it that as it was all T8 spg's except me in my T54 and the enemy team had a T34 and my team one without loosing a tank :P

also

Type 59 is on sale again - http://worldoftanks....ft-shop-offers/

and a Bonus Code - ENDWARNA

http://worldoftanks....day-bonus-code/

In honor of Victory Day and the ongoing Military Month specials we are pleased to offer you a fantastic bonus code:

Extra Combat Rations - x5

Case of Cola - x5

Chocolate - x5

Improved Combat Rations - x5

Strong coffee - x5

1 day Premium Time

Edited by Damit

I am unsure about the type 59. It isn't really all that great of a tank, it had the same nerfs as the T-54, some new weak spots put in and had it's MM changed pretty quickly.

Probably don't need any more credit making power with:

Lowe, T34, Pz38H, T14, Churchill and T-127

The Churchill is going to be an absolute monster after 7.3. The T14 even does OK. It's funny fighting Churchills and T14s in my teir 5 Hvy premiums. Most of them have no clue where to shoot. The Churchill drivers often think they can take the T14 head on, this is not the case and you just pump shells through the drivers machinegun port. Churchill vs T14 they nearly always let me get to their side and plink their engine over and over.

Meh, IS-4 feels weaker compared to back in T9, armor doesn't seem to bounce anything now.

IS-8 also has f**k all armor for T9 & gets pentrated easily by everybody.

Edited by Mayuri Krab

Saw an IS-8 bounce a T110 shot so it can't be all bad.

Sold the KV-1, KV-2 and T-150 without playing a single game in them. Kept the KV-3 just because I don't like the gap in my Russian tech tree.

Finally bought the 704

Me20Gusta.png

I now have a BL-10 AND armour

79644cd774e764847ca923c2ceaa36b5.png

KV-3 is easily my favourite T7 tank now.

In the ideal game (I'm the only T7 everyone is T6 or lower + no/little arty) it is pwnage time!

The upgraded 122mm can KO lower tiers in 1 hit & the reload time is much improved over the old 122 it had back in T6.

It also gets a beasty T9 engine upgrade so the speed is decent for a heavily armored heavy.

Only real problem is the terrible turrent rotation & you will get T50s swarming around you like files, but I usually ignore them (unless there is arty) as they can't pentrate you pretty much anywhere with their pee-size guns.

Edited by Mayuri Krab

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...