Jump to content
SAU Community

Uas 300Zx Vs. Standard 300Zx Aero Analysis And Results


Recommended Posts

UAS has recently begun using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software to aid us in designing elements of our aerodynamics package.

Unforunately time and cost constraints make a true to life simulation a difficut task to achieve, as ideally every component down to the smallest washer should be modeled into the software and then animated to garner accurate results.

STANDARD CAR

FULL CAR SIMULATION

The above two videos show the flow trajectories over the UAS Zed and a standard 300ZX respectively. Though the models are rough they are enough to indicate significant changes in aerodynamic downforce and drag. The figures in the above simulations showed the UAS Zed generated five times more downforce than the standard 300ZX at 200km/h.

To give the exact measurements that is an increase from approximately 50kg to almost 280kg. Drag also increased but only by a factor of two with the standard car measuring 100kg of downforce to the UAS car's 230kg.

The UAS rear wing is a fantastic example of how we use the software to aid our design despite our time constraints. By focusing on a small area in isolation, we can more clearly judge how changes will impact our drag and downforce characteristics.

REAR WING

In this instance it was found that adding a 15mm gurney strip to the larger lower rear wing increased the overall downforce by a significant amount ( ≈ 11%). This produces an extra 14kg of effective weight on the rear at 200kph, with only ≈3% increase in total rear wing drag.

We have also been able to generate numerical data using the program. Doing so allowed us to find a number of interesting results.

On straights, the wear wing of the UAS Zed has a tendancy to flex under the downforce load. This change in area has an impact on the overall downforce of the wing.

circuit_battle.jpg

Using CFD analysis we were able to simulate a number of different instances. We simulated a straight wing, one with the top wing flexing to touch the lower and an instance of both flexing to the same degree. We did this at both 200km/h and 100km/h simulating a worst case scenario through high and low speed corners.

As can be seen from the tabulated data this flexing causes a drastic change in the dynamics of the wing. Both downforce and drag are significantly reduced as the wing starts to bend.

graph.jpg

On straights this is beneficial as it has the same effect as the adjustable rear wing systems used in the 2011 formula 1 season, if to a lesser degree, reducing drag so we can achieve a higher top speed.

In low speed areas it is slightly more detrimental, however it should be noted that at these speeds overall downforce is significantly lower and as such flex is reduced causing a corresponding reduction in overall downforce lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

what is the wing made of/? that is some serious flex

Carbon fibre epoxy resin with sandwich foam core. It flexes because it has 200+kg downforce.

We recently added an aluminium right angle gurney strip to the trailing edge of the main rear wing blade. This will stiffen it up a little bit, although the flex is not all bad as it creates maximum efficiency at low speed where it needs it most. At high speed as it bends it reduces efficiency but also less drag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Two golds! Struggled to get silver on Gran Valley.
    • Interesting that it has 2 to the USB stick. Are the ones to the USB stick different? Or labelled anything at all? Telstra 4G is Band 28 is the long range one you want, it's 700mHz. I'm trying to do some reading on the Cel-Fi stuff, but I can't find any decent info online that makes me feel comfortable being able to work out the sort of antennas we could get away to swapping it over to. The antennas I'm starting to do some stuff with at work, are a transparent antenna. They're designed to stick onto the window. Which means you wouldn't even have the antenna outside the car. Volkswagen have just started using the exact same types of antennas on some of their new cars (And from the same antenna manufacturer). But, RF stuff is a bit of a dark art some days, and getting it wrong in your car could make for a terrible waste of money trying to swap antennas :S
    • I'm not going to lie Duncan, Saturday and Sunday were pretty rough days. The sort of work I was doing would previously have ended up with me spending about an hour and a half chatting with Neil. Firstly about something I had a question about, and then both of us rambling off on tangents.  I think how Neil did things, and his attitude to getting it done is helping me in part to get this stuff done. Then I can actually do the things I enjoy more easily  
    • Talked to another R34 GT-T owner, he said bonnet of his car once fell and slammed from full height because of strong wind at a car show and nothing was damaged or broken, so I guess I'm just overthinking some things but yeah, just making sure I'm not damaging the car anyhow cause wanna keep it for a long time.
    • I would say 100% that it doesn't matter at all. I have an Al bonnet and I drop it sometimes, push it others. Have done so for 25 years and there's no way to tell that either has caused any problems (because there are no problems).
×
×
  • Create New...