Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Um, I think that just about closes this thread.....

why?

he aint god.

Anyhow, I've personally seen dj_lethals car...

With what was a truck core of some description, and then he moved to a Trust core.

There was a noticeable difference.

he noticed it and said there was a difference no questions asked.

But they cant be too bad, going back to VL's etc that run your happy 11 with nothing more than truck cores, with new end tanks.

Take it as you will i guess.

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Also if anyone has ever looked at the original Nizpro cores(the massive ones)they are definitly truck cores, Simon must of made a mint of these as he charged around 2 grand when new.

you wanna go around and turn this into a commodore forum?

dont go bagging workshops based on what you 'think'

Greddy turbos, as SKid has pointedly referred to, are a Mitsubisi Heavy Industry product found on commercial vehicles.

CFM is CFM, and if it can work (and work well) in an application that it wasn't specifically designed for then what's the problem?

Funnily enough, theres a bit of development work you forgot to mention.

Bolt a turbo off a truck onto your car and pay the price. A Trust isn't just a rebadged Mitsubishi turbo, it is a high output car turbo based on a truck core and covers with different comp and exhaust wheels.

And OHR-30T a 400 hp truck core isn't ging to flow 400 hp once you cut it down becauses power, whether it's form a 2L or a 10L engine is based primarily on airflow (and efficiency) and once you remove half the cores it's only a 200hp core simple as that. 400 hp requires 400 hp worth of air, you may find theres a 20% difference in engine efficiency between the two engines so the half cut down core may actually be able to make about 220hp on a 2L. Still not great.

...... and if it can work (and work well) in an application that it wasn't specifically designed for then what's the problem?

thats the thing IF, if means R&D, you may get it right the first time, you may not. Companies spend huge sums of money to get a good cooler design/end tank setup - to think you can just slap a cut down truck core on a car with a couple of end tanks, and you will get it to work well - jeez, if only it was that easy, intercoolers would probably cost 3-400 each.

intercoolers can be good and can be bad - make sure you buy a good one the first time and you will definately reap the rewards. If someone wants to sell you a cooler, ask what testing they have done. If they cant give you repeatable results, and actual figures, they havent done their R&D.

I dont think try09s is a good example, his car is just slightly moddified, and its requirements dont represent those of the average street car, even if it is mildly tuned (under 350rwkw).

As soon as you start talking about drag cars, the whole point of the discussion is being somewhat missed - drag cars also do well without intercoolers.

another 0.02:)

just to let everybody know most intercooler cores on trucks have a very different fin design. they are designed for the typical inlet temperatures of a diesel(far less than a petrol) therefore do not need to cool the air as much as a petrol engine. if u want to use a truck intercooler core i suggest you run a thermo fan if not 2 so as to get sufficient cooling otherwise stick with application specific cores.

whether it's form a 2L or a 10L engine is based primarily on airflow (and efficiency) and once you remove half the cores it's only a 200hp core simple as that. 400 hp requires 400 hp worth of air,

maybe i got it all wrong *dodges the flame*

a 10ltr motor... would require more air than a 2ltr motor to make 400hp wouldnt it?

So chopping the core wouldnt be a problem.

Or am i just dumb :confused:

either way i've got a big ARC I/C :D

Doughboy, John Munro, with his 9sec GTR soon to b 8sec :P does not run an intercooler as it is fueled by methanol, which is basically a cooler burning fuel.

Also there are shitloads of other cars example, numerous rotars, that also run with no intercooler and are doin 7-8sec runs.

Reason being, extra lag caused by running an intercooler is detremental to the cars time on the 1/4. Therefore on REAL drag cars, they over come this by using a cooler fuel like methanol. The car will not need an intercooler as inlet temperatures wont get too high over a very short period, ie a fast 1/4 mile run.

So i really think u should actually know wat u are talkin about b4 u go spreading bs.

But are exotic fuels like methanol really relevent to this discussion....

My opinion is that truck coolers dont really add up from a value for money perspective once you add in all the labour involved with making decent end tanks and fitting it into the car.

Although this is getting off the topic a fair bit..

EnricoPalazzo, I think you may have misread my post. But having posted such an informative and sweeping statement, could you please enlighten my misguided soul and direct me to real life examples of front running turbocharged drag racing cars that do not use an intercooler?

Citing Mr. Munro's yet-to-be-run car doesn't qualify as one, but the MSRP Supra, any Pro 5.0 Mustang (really, these cars are the pinacle of turbo drag car development), any Japanese or world-wide Skyline vehicles, or even the Australian rotaries would count. Oh hang on, I can't see one that isn't using an intercooler. I think that maybe my reference material is outdated?

Please show me some proof so I can apologize for spreading "bs" as you put it.

.

And OHR-30T a 400 hp truck core isn't ging to flow 400 hp once you cut it down becauses power, whether it's form a 2L or a 10L engine is based primarily on airflow (and efficiency) and once you remove half the cores it's only a 200hp core simple as that. 400 hp requires 400 hp worth of air, you may find theres a 20% difference in engine efficiency between the two engines so the half cut down core may actually be able to make about 220hp on a 2L. Still not great.

I beg to differ :(

Let's say a 2L engine needs to swallow 20L of air a minute at x boost to pressuries its 2L capacity,and produce 400hp. Now,if an engine 5times that capacity needs its capacity filled,wouldn't you imagine it'd need much more volume of air?(5 times?) And yes I realise truck and car engines have different requirments,but a big capacity engine needs to swallow a lot of air.And,as you say,air flow is air flow,so the air flow through a cooler should be rated in actual flow,not in HPs worth.

Show me a drag car without an intercooler and i'll show you someone running at the back of the pack on a very tight budget (and probably having a frustrating, but good, time).

From http://www.mazsport.com/rresults.html

One of the quickest RCE cars in Oz is Grant Williams' Series IV RX-7 (first half second generation) with full tube frame. He runs a 13B single turbo, no intercooler, 55 mm Weber, and 25 HP nitrous kit. His times are 8.76 at 154 mph.
could you please enlighten my misguided soul and direct me to real life examples of front running turbocharged drag racing cars that do not use an intercooler?

Citing Mr. Munro's yet-to-be-run car doesn't qualify as one, but the MSRP Supra, any Pro 5.0 Mustang (really, these cars are the pinacle of turbo drag car development), any Japanese or world-wide Skyline vehicles, or even the Australian rotaries would count. Oh hang on, I can't see one that isn't using an intercooler. I think that maybe my reference material is outdated?

Please show me some proof so I can apologize for spreading "bs" as you put it.

two birds, one stone.

the dalton rx7 that runs 8s doesnt use a coola at all, straight from the turbo to throttle body on methanol, as does australias fastest FWD 'delsol' which runs 9s, i know of many fast vls that run truck coolas but vls follow a trend that has no real benefit( running no bov thus causing lag,) its like a cult thing. ud find many drag cars r using water to air koolers these days as well although i think that would b for a fully worked drag car. me personally would go for a trust 600 by 300 by 75 koola imported straight from japan, havent heard any complaints bout them

Redline2003 is right, Dalton's car is quicker than Grant William's and also uses no intercooler. But if you want to compare it to front running vehicles....

In RR/SK people are doing high 7's. In outright rotary the cars are doing low 7's. 8's aren't cutting it. That time you quoted is nearly 1 full second off the pace.

Remember to,that methanol negates the need for an intercooler at all,as it is so cool burning.

I guess it depends on how much money you have to spend on a cooler....For those lucky enough to be able to shell out $1000+ for high quality Japanese kits,the choice is easy.For those of us on much lower budgets,sometimes we need to look at much cheaper alternitives(ie truck cores),but still hope for good results.

8 seconds might be quick and it might not, it depends in what class you are in, and what everyone else runs. It is all relative................

If you turned up in an 8 second AA fueler you would be laughed off the strip.

Comparing a street driven car running on unleaded petrol to a methanol, nitromethane, or nitrous powered track freak is not a fair comparison either.

AA fuelers do not run intercoolers either, and they are the fastest accelerating cars of all, so what.

Back to reality. If you drive a petrol powered road car, and it has forced induction, an intercooler is absolutely a must have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
    • So left off with high hopes of having a gearbox in pretty quickly........ Got the adapter plate that week and had to chase a few threads and work out how/where everything goes as no instructions. Got the adapter fitted, test fitted gearbox and found had to cut and shave a few things. Tunnel required some hits with a decent hammer to give some clearance on passenger side but it fits with no problems,  could fit a 8hp70 with a little more work. For a cross member I wasn't going to spend $1100 on so shiny machined piece. Went through a few designs and remembered I had a gktech s chassis to cd00# cross member. Fitted that and found its close enough with a few extra bits welded so have gone that way and still a work in progress.  After this got into modifying the intercooler with some bends and clamps. I was procrastinating on this as was not keen to cut up and weld it myself but happy with the outcome.  Onto the radiator shroud and oil cooler mount. This thing took way longer than I thought it would but having to add an extra oil cooler for the trans and wanting everything within the chassis rails its good enough for now. It mounts to the chassis and gives plenty of room for lines and pipes. All the coolers are rubber mounted and sealed the shroud on the top and sides, will use some tape to seal the bottom gap of about 10mm. 20250508_111500.mp4   Next job was to build the new diff and after a delay with a friend got built this week. I ended up putting it all together with supervision and was good to learn how to set one up correctly. I ended up going a 3.69 ratio, nismo 1.5 way gt pro with gtr Axel's. Stripped it all down, gave all the parts a good clean, pressed on new bearings and set backlash. Was good working in a clean assembly room with all the gear. Once got home wire wheeled the case and hit it with some rollbar/chassis black paint. Got a few more bits done but will leave them for the next update.
    • That could be drilled, ground and welded. Would stop it progressing and leaking. But that block shouldn't be pushed very hard, as what you see there is a massive warning sign. But that fix also isn't going to happen properly with the engine in the car, and assembled. So you're looking at anew block if you're doing all that work anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...