Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you don't have a built motor, forget about it.

You are going from a 300rwkw turbo setup to over 400rwkw with TD05 twin high mounts. Which cannot be anything but mega laggy depending on what you want

Thats utter drivil...

First off what N1's are they? 32,33 or 34 N1's??? 300rwkw... only if they were 34 N1's and if they were 32/33 N1's they're going to be very laggy for what they are.

Where the hell do you get 'if you want more than 300rwkw then you need a built engine' BS from. Factory 26's can easily handle over 400rwkw for many years. I'd wager most people on this forum who run more than 300kw are doing so on stock or very close to factory engines.

16g td05's offer a very similar delivery and power production to t517z's... However with better manifolds and external wastegates would be more suited to that end of the power scale.

... just because they're not your precious -5's dosn't mean they're 'megga' anything.

Justin

Edited by XRATED

Thats utter drivil...

First off what N1's are they? 32,33 or 34 N1's??? 300rwkw... only if they were 34 N1's and if they were 32/33 N1's they're going to be very laggy for what they are.

Where the hell do you get 'if you want more than 300rwkw then you need a built engine' BS from. Factory 26's can easily handle over 400rwkw for many years. I'd wager most people on this forum who run more than 300kw are doing so on stock or very close to factory engines.

16g td05's offer a very similar delivery and power production to t517z's... However with better manifolds and external wastegates would be more suited to that end of the power scale.

... just because they're not your precious -5's dosn't mean they're 'megga' anything.

Justin

If the RB26 is brand new it might cope with 400kws.....but 20 years of abuse i doubt even at 300kws most untouched RB26s wouldnt last 2 track days

If the RB26 is brand new it might cope with 400kws.....but 20 years of abuse i doubt even at 300kws most untouched RB26s wouldnt last 2 track days

Again... not true.

I campaingned a stock 15yo unopened rb26 for more than 2 years drag racing and street driving with more than 400rwkw plus nitrous before I made a mistake and killed it....

I was just at a track day where there was a stock rb25 that makes 360+rwkw is track often and see's a general hard life... guess what, more than 3 years in it's current tune!

J.

Ah my confusion between TD06/TD05, my bad there. Wasn't paying attention this morning clearly - hence you'll note I said high mounts.

However to say...

Factory 26's can easily handle over 400rwkw for many years.

Shows nothing but ignorance and is grossly misleading users. It's stupid to expect a stock 26 (20yrs old) to take 400rwkw day in day out. Especially when you are basing your claim off handfuls of motors. Not the general populace.

I can't think of any many users on this forum who've reliability run 400rwkw for extended periods without something letting go. Some have run 360-380rwkw for 2-3 years, but eventually died also.

I call reliability - something that will last. 3-5 years for a motor is not reliable. Plus this guy isn't after 400rwkw anyway. You'd know if you'd read his past threads he isn't a risk taker.

im not looking at super power that will require needing to rebuild engine, just looking at simple bolt on mods, to get more out of car.

400rwkw will require him to rebuild the engine in the end regardless. So 400rwkw is just plain dumb.

Hopefully Rhys is smart enough to realise this as well. Because son of rajab knows you won't be paying for the rebuild. He will.

I'd wager most people on this forum who run more than 300kw are doing so on stock or very close to factory engines.

So would I. What's you point?

Lots of people are running between 300-350rwkw on stock motors. It's a far cry from 400rwkw+ however.

Drag racing is a different kettle of fish to circuit stuff..at the drags you do what half a dozen runs at say 11secs of WOT compared to 4 15-20 min sessions of full noise.

Kinda relevent, a Friend of mine drag raced his XA hardtop falcon for years, making 480rwhp with stock rods/crank and hypertech pistons, first track day bent a rod in the 2nd session.

Quick edit - I would happily whack 2 TD-05s to my 220,000k old 1jz and dragrace/steet drive it....would I do track days no way!

Not sure if the OP wants to do circit work or just have a quickish street/strip car

Ah my confusion between TD06/TD05, my bad there. Wasn't paying attention this morning clearly - hence you'll note I said high mounts.

However to say...

Shows nothing but ignorance and is grossly misleading users. It's stupid to expect a stock 26 (20yrs old) to take 400rwkw day in day out. Especially when you are basing your claim off handfuls of motors. Not the general populace.

I can't think of any many users on this forum who've reliability run 400rwkw for extended periods without something letting go. Some have run 360-380rwkw for 2-3 years, but eventually died also.

I call reliability - something that will last. 3-5 years for a motor is not reliable. Plus this guy isn't after 400rwkw anyway. You'd know if you'd read his past threads he isn't a risk taker.

400rwkw will require him to rebuild the engine in the end regardless. So 400rwkw is just plain dumb.

Hopefully Rhys is smart enough to realise this as well. Because son of rajab knows you won't be paying for the rebuild. He will.

So would I. What's you point?

Lots of people are running between 300-350rwkw on stock motors. It's a far cry from 400rwkw+ however.

1. It's not ignorance... it's experience.

2. You don't have to build an engine to run 400rwkw capable turbo's... simple as that.

3. How many full built engines don't last 1000km little own 5 years- A LOT!

4. I don't know the OP- I don't know his car or what he's going to do with it... I don't presume to tell him what he should or shouldnt have.

Why dose this have to turn into a built v stock, -5 v td... debate thread?

J.

Trust turbos are awesome fun though.

My old TD06-20g kit made 580kw, stock bottom end with my race cars head fitted ( big apexi cams, ports and valves)

It was great but lasted 3 months before smashing the block to buts

Ha ha ha... well daaa

Hope it didn't damage the head... oooo...

Were they 8cm or 10cm exh housings?

This set up has seen 407rwkw..

As I said above, very similar to t517z's. It's actually the reason why I bought them to start with as I made a little over 400 with t517z's but felt at that power level better exh manifolds and an external wastegate may have been a better option.

J.

1. It's not ignorance... it's experience.

2. You don't have to build an engine to run 400rwkw capable turbo's... simple as that.

3. How many full built engines don't last 1000km little own 5 years- A LOT!

4. I don't know the OP- I don't know his car or what he's going to do with it... I don't presume to tell him what he should or shouldnt have.

Why dose this have to turn into a built v stock, -5 v td... debate thread?

J.

1. Yes, it is ignorance.

2. Why would you run turbos capable of 400rwkw, and not make 400rwkw? :ermm:

3. Nothing to do with the conversation.

4. Neither do I. But i had a quick go over his post history.

Nowhere in this thread have I even mentioned Garrett turbos. So it's not Garrett vs Trust debate. You attempted to start one with earlier comments, as you have with built motors.

I think the most ironic part of this thread, and probably why you are trying to steer it off course...

It is your turbo kit he is looking at buying.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/361523-hks-trust-turbosmart-precision-turbo/page__p__5770060__fromsearch__1#entry5770060

No wonder you are saying it's great, you can make 400rwkw on stock motors safely. :rolleyes:

YES IT'S MY TURBO KIT FOR SALE...

If you look over my posts for the last 6 odd years... I'm not saying anything new.

I don't really care if they guy buy's it or not. It dosn't really influence my comments.

You just have to be right though don't you. Whatever.

So lets get back no topic hmm?? before you start deleting my posts-

"i got R32 GTR and was told it has N1 turbos when i bought it. l noticed guy selling this on forum how does it compare to what i got now? Twin td05 kit to suit rb26 with manifolds and dump pipes"

It will make more power and will be more laggy.

Cheers

Justin

I know you are not saying anything new Justin, and you've been saying it for quite a while. Not arguing that.

The general consensus, results, user feedback overall on motor deaths etc. I think it's a bit of a risk to say 400rwkw is easily producible, reliable and so on with a stock bottom end.

I don't delete posts just because it's a healthy discussion dude. That's going a bit too far.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the thing. Especially at idle, changing the cam angle by that much could be spewing more fuel out the exhaust courtesy of everything happening that bit later. More fuel also means more air (if the fuel didn't burn, then neither did the O2) and so the O2 sensors can start to tell interesting but misleading stories. And the specifics of what is happening could easily be affected by everything else you changed as well. And it could be dynamic, where a few revs more or less could somewhat change how the engine is breathing.
    • Good idea on the temp probe. The mv readings of the O2 sensors are very similar to one another, as is the injector pw. I went through logs in the past to see if there was a discrepancy and there is. Because they alternate up and down as narrowbands do.. they do often 'switch' as to which one is more. They were never 20%+ (more like 1-2%) so it's possible the difference between 20 and 15-17% is a similar discrepancy to 2.0% and 1.7% which I wouldn't have really noticed in the past. We did think about spacing the strut brace. Unfortunately the ~20mm that the GTR brace is lower than the GTT brace is effectively what you need to clear the vents. Moving it up would make it very uncomfortable, but it's plausible that 10mm is a unhappy medium between both hard places... The good news is.. using MR HAMMER it was actually pretty easy to bend back the bent bits to make sure the guard and headlight/new headlight tabs line up right. Yes, we used a R34 GTR guard to make sure the bolt holes all lined up with a known straight guard. As above, you can see the side skirt and the GTR guard are not meant to play together, but everyone seems to think this is a simple fix to the point where nobody who has had these talk to one another mentions how... ...so I'll just assume they know how to fix it when it comes to paint jail time again. Whoever they are. Nobody returns my calls. There's so much changed with regard to the ECU and the car.. that the next step really is to connect the scanner and attempt to drive the thing. It'll be pretty clear pretty fast how in or out everything actually is...
    • That's nasty! I think there is perhaps an inherent problem is using elastomers in such environments. The whole thing can and will get quite hot, and elastomers are not famous for their temperature resistance. On top of that, if the components are cast rubber or urethane and so on, there might be QA/QC problems with bubbles or voids in the material that could critically change their performance. They might just tear apart after being squished (presuming that any elastomers are used in compression rather than tension, I'm thinking that you squeeze one with a void in it and it tears the wall of the void to the outer edge of block, then the next time it extends or otherwise twists, it just gives up). This is all purely hypothetical, but it makes me wonder if the things that they have put into it to make it nice to use/live with are perhaps going to cause occasional failures like this. I wouldn't be getting up in arms over it, unless there are many repeats. I have personally ruined an Xtreme clutch - just an HD thing. I can't remember if it was still behind the 20 or was after the 25 went in. But it inverted some of the retaining spring/clip things around the outside. No-one could explain it. It wasn't thrashed, there wasn't heaps of torque being put through it, and there were no obvious problems other than the above. They were quite concerned by the event so they replaced it even though it was a few years old, which was very nice of them. As far as I am concerned, these things happen with clutches.
    • Any damage to the box/input shaft?
    • Hey there Mate , I just got my local guy to install it Waterhouse Performance, Penrith (specialise Nissan/Datsun and other performance cars) , you can do it yourself if you like , AMS has instructions on their website.  Cheers Pac
×
×
  • Create New...