Jump to content
SAU Community

Who's Raging?

krzysiu

By krzysiu,
in PC & Games Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

boiracer Grand Master

boiracer

Posted
Posted (edited)

PSN was hacked not via a PS3, but a PC emulating a PS3 from what I read. PS3 hash being leaked had nothing to do with that. Sony just sucked at protocol encryption.

There's hackers who hack because they don't like the way a product functions, and there's hackers who hack to steal. Know the difference.

Besides... who uses non disposable credit card accounts with no overdraw or low limits on the internet these days? What are you 50 and technologically illiterate?

no difference...all just jerks with nothing better to do than whinge about everything not being how they want it, or willing to work for their own pay

.......same as hacking games..why??? just play it as its intended. dont like it. create your own if you think your better. i will never understand hackers

plz come back online soon...i really wanna drive my Muira again.....

Edited by boiracer
funkymonkey Grand Master

funkymonkey

Posted
Posted

no difference...all just jerks with nothing better to do than whinge about everything not being how they want it, or willing to work for their own pay

.......same as hacking games..why??? just play it as its intended. dont like it. create your own if you think your better. i will never understand hackers

I see. so when are you gonna design and build a car that works and performs the way you want it to, instead of bolting on bits that other people develop to hack your car to perform better?

don't understand em? look at yourself and replace your car with a PS3.

the irony is hilarious.

EeLeYe Mentor

EeLeYe

Posted
Posted

[quote name=ClutchBurndout-:(' timestamp='1304391521' post='5791780]

how about you all go get an xbox and stfu

Yeah, but then we'll be complaining about having to pay just to play online. I don't care if it's only $12 or whatever; it's the principle. Online play should be free.

And as for PC - Sure, no argument it's the best platform, but I prefer buying a game and not having to worry whether or not it will run properly on my machine.

For the record, I'll buy an xbox.................................. when my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

FrangaR33 Mentor

FrangaR33

Posted
Posted

Yeah, but then we'll be complaining about having to pay just to play online. I don't care if it's only $12 or whatever; it's the principle. Online play should be free.

And as for PC - Sure, no argument it's the best platform, but I prefer buying a game and not having to worry whether or not it will run properly on my machine.

For the record, I'll buy an xbox.................................. when my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

Total time spent not playing my Xbox 360 due to it being broken because of cheap karnts at Microsoft not affording 8 extra bolts 1 year, 3 months 12 days and running. (2 broken Xbox's)

Total time spent not playing my Ps3 online because of some asshole hackers 2 weeks and running

Yeah I still prefer the Ps3, at least I can still play offline. If my Ps3 breaks or PSN is down for 1 year and 3 months then I will consider the 360 the superior console.

Madaz Grand Master

Madaz

Posted
Posted

Yeah, but then we'll be complaining about having to pay just to play online. I don't care if it's only $12 or whatever; it's the principle. Online play should be free.

And as for PC - Sure, no argument it's the best platform, but I prefer buying a game and not having to worry whether or not it will run properly on my machine.

For the record, I'll buy an xbox.................................. when my shit turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbet.

stands in line for rainbow sherbet :whistling:

boiracer Grand Master

boiracer

Posted
Posted

I see. so when are you gonna design and build a car that works and performs the way you want it to, instead of bolting on bits that other people develop to hack your car to perform better?

don't understand em? look at yourself and replace your car with a PS3.

the irony is hilarious.

lol.....not entirely sure what you said there. but...

Im happy with my car......so building my own would be silly.

and bolt on bits arent hacks....my exhaust doesnt drive my car for me...it merely makes it slightly better at what it does well anyways. hacks remove the need to play the game....not make the machine run faster.

.:: GimpS-R34 ::. Grand Master

.:: GimpS-R34 ::.

Posted
Posted

PS3 was made for playing games *shocking gasp* no matter where sony think they can get extra sales.. it's all just added shit to get people buying a ps3..

I've had 2 xbox's so far.. Both are sitting at home working fine.. Never had problems.. The RROD was due to overheating (most of the time) and was a simple fix.. annoying because microsoft didnt just fix the problem straight away.. my ps3 has never had problems either but i use the xbox 99% of the time.. Both consoles are good but i'm used to the xbox controller and i prefer the xbox layout..

In regards to online play..I was initially pissed about having to pay for online play but I think you get an all round better service.. And they spend more money on the online side.. And then there's the fact that the security is better due to costs.. Total time having to worry about hackers stealing my identity on xbox = 0 days.. ps3 = 2 weeks and running..

funky wins the game

oweban Grand Master

oweban

Posted
Posted

The only people that think hacking is a good idea in this thread are the comp nerds that work in IT lol

Because we know there's other reasons to "hack" a system than to go LOL CHEATS IN A GAME OLOLOLOL WAREZ

*shrug*

I never had the option of Other OS, as I got a Slim, long after they closed it. Would have LOVED to have that option, and wish I still had hardware emulation for PS2 games too, as in the first gen of PS3s.I'm just a huge nerd though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • soviet_merlin
      NC MX5

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Any difference in induction noise?
    • GTSBoy
      Dumb rich kid tries modding for the first time

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I think you know exactly who I mean.
    • soviet_merlin
      Dumb rich kid tries modding for the first time

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      If I got a dollar for every flipped commuter missile I've driven past I'd have two dollars   Some people get into wild adventures on the road and I doubt it's gender or ethnicity specific. I'm just glad I don't usually drive during peak times.
    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Just got the car back and gave it a good run back home Power wise, whilst it only made a extra 5 killerwasps up top at 7200 rpm, it made more power everywhere from 2500 rpm and kept pulling much harder all the way, to the point of me relearning when to shift so I don't hit the 7200 limiter, with the old intake it seemed to take alot more time to rev out, and, throttle response is also much improved  As I didn't want to remove the bumper every time I serviced the air filter (basically every aftermarket and fabricated CAI has the filter behind the bumper) it currently has a hektic exposed pod in the engine bay sucking in hot air, this will be rectified shortly after some some of my CAD (cardboard assisted design) for a alloy heat shield feed by the OEM intake tube behind the bumper, this will cop some wrinkle black paint, as well as the intake pipe for that totally OEM look... The only fly in the ointment was that the OEM "strut" brace doesn't fit over the rear runner of the new intake with the 2.5 engine is in the engine bay, as the 2.5 raises the engine up by 20mm, it's not a war stopper, and I didn't notice any difference without it in some twisties, but....... MX5 Mania is bringing in some GWR "fancy pants" braces that apparently do fit, if it bolts up I'll grab it, it is also stiffer than the OEM one, which is a bonus All in all I'm happy with the outcome      Fancy pants "strut" brace that gives the required clearance      This is where the clearance issue was, the GWR extends out past this
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Well, I'm back from the dyno today. Some things do partially make sense. The pod filter/airbox delete picked up between 6-10rwkw on 98 - because heat soak does kind of affect things and there was playing with tune/timing/AFR. Oddly enough, the car was running much leaner than before. So lean it was audibly pinging on the dyno which I got video of:   70de0dd5-2099-4a71-8b10-6fc833fb9d59.mp4   We're talking going from ~12.7 in the past to the first run being at like ~14.0. It is now tuned to ~12.5 on the Dyno, which correlates to about ~12.1 on my wideband in the car. These matched last time, which is very odd. The dyno plots only show the dyno's reported AFR - should be last time, yet now it no longer agrees and was way leaner. Nobody has an explanation for how a pod can make the car run notably leaner, yet not really give any more power when you add fuel in. A few different types of intake design were tested:   94c22c34-7991-4902-af85-314b5f5bf352.mp4   There was no difference other than IAT with the pod sticking out of the bay. The pod sticking out of the bay (but connected) is actually still warmer than what I usually see on the road. Removing the pod entirely lost about ~2kw. But to be fair, all of the runs could be argued to vary by that amount when temperatures climb etc etc. It's safe to say that the filter isn't causing any restrictions of any note that can be reasonably altered in any way. This is in line with what I'd expect given the Engine Masters testing. 323KW on 98 and ~335KW on E85 is actually a pretty solid result, up about ~45kw from 99% of LS1 cammed combos, with generally much larger cams/exhaust etc as well. It is after all up 42KW (98) and 54KW (E85) from before. +10KW from a pod and removing the box is cheap as chips compared to what the head work cost per kw No, I did not get to drop the exhaust and test. When it comes to exhaust... it all just seems to change frequencies and cost or gain 2hp here or there. I don't realistically think I'll drop this to test it - because there's not much else I can really do about it/route it any other way/make it bigger/just bought mufflers. Engine masters beat the hell out of headers with a hammer to deliberately kink them and didn't lose power at all, I sincerely doubt that going larger primaries would help. If it were even possible for clearance/conversion reasons... which it's not... I may throw the E85 in there at some point and do a drag run to see what MPH it traps for science. It isn't lost on me that ~320kw Skylines do trap about the same MPH that ~370kw F-Body/Corvettes do in the USA for the same  or similar weight. (122-125mph). Of course, if I go there and trap 104mph or something then I'll just 'accidentally' have an accident on the way home from the drag strip and buy a M4.
×
×
  • Create New...