Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

is the F22C a honda prelude engine i have seen a AE86 with a s200 engine woukld have cost abit i think an sr20 or 4AGE is happening im also looking at a VQ20ET or VQ30DET what about these nissan engines i really didnt wanna use a V6 though as balance would be stuffed.

I had a 13b bridgeport with a modified niki (factory 12a) carb and it made 150rwkw, was a heap of fun in a s2 rx7, with a well tuned webber i would have gotten a good 50hp increase.

As stated before, turbo on an na motor is fine, just like bolting a turbo onto any na tho you have to keep the boost low.

OK, my 2c..

Doing EJ motor is going to be next to impossible, I would let this dream go quick smart.

What you do want is something reasonably powerful with a broad and reasonably high revving. That way you have the grunt to go fast, and done need to break traction everywhere OR fight for power. How to do it? Sub average capacity 4 with a turbo.

If I remember correctly.. It is either an RB20 crossmember OR RB20 engine mounts you need to be able to bolt a CA18 or SR20 straight into the KE chassis.

A CA18DET with a T28 will give you a good 160rwkw that wont make it an absolute shitfight to drive and will make it a low 12 second car. This is what I would do. Personally I would probably fit a T25G off an S13 SR20DET and run the stock ecu with a decent exhaust and cooler.. Call it up to 140rwkw and just keep smilling.

Easy to do, cost effective, good on fuel, cheap to maintain, no need for excessive modification or non factory setups and a fast car.

All in all, win.

yes i know of this engine the only 3SG that was made in RWD format nice engine but i think im looking at a 3RZFE 2.7LT from a 97 hilux keep it NA for awhile then turbo it when i get more cash to buy a nice big snail.

Nope wont be going black top or 20V or 16V it will be a 3RZFE i have checked this out read alot about them fit into earlier rollas without much hassles w58 box fits mounts is the only mod needed to mak eit fit and a custom intake plenum for bonnet clearence not much on youtube about the engine though that i cud find.

I know its out of a hilux 97

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
×
×
  • Create New...