Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, was referring to the stock ecu.

The emanage will modify an existing signal (x +/-) so if/when the stock ECU changes it's tune, you'd see a change in the overall tune.

yeh thats true.. but i guess its something we could probably never confirm..

Scott: is there a pinout for oil pressure?? or of the similar perhaps?

oh yeh i know that, i thought initially he was talking about the emanage having inputs.

after speaking to craig i think my problem is the fuel pump.

seeing as i bought it off the same person, i come to the assumption that they are fake.

Failing fuel pump = Less Fuel = Higher AFR? Makes sense to me.

Was it an ebay store you guys bought through?

Failing fuel pump = Less Fuel = Higher AFR? Makes sense to me.

Was it an ebay store you guys bought through?

yeh it was.. scott laughed at me when i told him lol.

I have a shop that sells them locally for $130, and are a genuine Walbro Disto.. so will definitely go and get one once i test it with scottys spare tomei one..

FWIW, craig explained what happens when his would die. and its exactly what mines doing..fuel pump may have just coincidentally shit itself while i did the oil.

come to think of it, the car was stuttering on idle the night before after a spirited drive..

thanks everyone

lol... perhaps something you could have told us earlier?

didnt think it was necesary. my when it did this my AFR's were showing 10. 10 being the minimum of my gage so it could well have been richer

so i found it wasnt the fuel pump, wasted $130 on a original walbro...

Cihan had a look at the tune and was confused as it had gone all over the place..

i explained that i fixed an oil isue(in detail)..

he retuned it back to AFR's of 11 on WOT.

a f**kING noticable difference from the last tune which was at 285kw.. now at full throttle in the dry i loose traction at the end of first gear..with the pirellis.

so ive made a significant gain of power.. also my boost issue has gone away and is now sitting at a comfortable 20 psi right through the rev range.. however ill still be getting a larger wastegate and running it..

he also said im close to 80% of injectors lol

im one happy camper today.. f**king glad somethings gone right for a change

a f**kING noticable difference from the last tune which was at 285kw.. now at full throttle in the dry i loose traction at the end of first gear..with the pirellis.

Youve neglected to tell us what the new number is :P

i dunoo it was a road tune..

he guestimates from last time that its definitely above 300awkw.. only to get more once i change the wastegate lol

it has to be over that as a 15 kw difference isnt this noticable at all

Haha, never happy are you mate. :whistling:

The general consensus is more boost not less. What are you worried about? :ninja:

coming from the guy whos putting a GTX in his Stagea.

hey if i can open up that wastegate, and run the power that i have now, at lower boost, i'll be happy!

honestly if i find that ill make over 300.. i'll ask him to de tune it back to 300awkw i actually dont want to run more than that, as its probably close to shitting the internals.. honestly you need to take it for a drive today its fkn different to the last tune..

coming from the guy whos putting a GTX in his Stagea.

hey if i can open up that wastegate, and run the power that i have now, at lower boost, i'll be happy!

honestly if i find that ill make over 300.. i'll ask him to de tune it back to 300awkw i actually dont want to run more than that, as its probably close to shitting the internals.. honestly you need to take it for a drive today its fkn different to the last tune..

Engine? Doubtful.

Transmission? Maybe (I still reckon the stock box with a shift kit will handle it)

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...