Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have an rb30e

has extractors, 2.5 in zorst, pod.

Has any.one here ever used a nistune or similar on a relativly stock rb30? Seeing as its a rather soft tune on 91 octane im woundering if a more agressive tune and 98 octane fuel would net noticible gains? Im thinking 10-15kw could be had from a beter tune without changing the cam

and before u post about twin cam conversions and turbos being the more economic choice i would like to alert you to the fact.that im not ignorant or retarded... I want throttle response to be perfect so im not boosting it. Twin cam conversion might be an option however it may be excesive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363895-rb30e-am-ecu-tune-experience/
Share on other sites

P plater?

Bro, yo're never gonna get amazing power with an RB30E. If you choose the right turbo and it's tuned correctly, throttle response won't be an issue.

Spending money on an RB30E, with no turbo or DOHC head, is like running in the paralympics, even if you win, it's still retarded.

FWIW, you'd gain a little with a proper tune, but simply bolting on a twim cam head will not only give you more power, a larger power band and a higher rev limit, but you'll have more potential too.

Mmm no not a p plater... Ive owned a few 200 rwkw+ cars in my time...

Throttle responce is always an issue with a turbo. Always.

Im chasing a wide and flat power curve with high torque. Not some high kw figure or amazing narrow power band. Hence why im considering options besides a cam change.

Ive driven a car with a 30de and another with 30det in fact my car used to have the 30det in it... The 30de felt great if a little peaky but the owner really has had soo mnay issues with it.... Im reluctant to go down the same path.

Edited by Cheddle

yeah the r31 ecus are easily "chipped"

Nistune offer a daughterboard upgrade for the ecu to alow on the fly tuning and connectivity with a laptop. im most likely going down that path as a local tuner has experience both installing and tuning Nistune

ive been thinking about the 30de option and its becoming more attractive.. i might buy another engine and build it up, but for now im still hungry for some more poke

skitzr31's high-compression rb30de made 150 rwkw running on a stock rb25det ecu with no tuning... iirc

wouldnt mind doing that...

As odd as it may sound, results the R31 boys have found is that a 'chip' from dark half for example actually loses a bit of top end power (so your kW number) but give a bit more beans down low and mid. Results which were also proven by a mate of mine who had a 110kW RB30 (fresh rebuild) with just the 20 degree's ign mod (+gts headers/exhaust & enclosed pod), dark half chipped it and he got 105, then 65mm TB'd it and still got 108. Overlaying the graphs, even allowing for Dyno fluctuation it was pretty clear that the dark half had great mid range but power dropped off earlier, and the fuel mixtures weren’t really any better than standard (which is to be expected from a mail order tune, just for safety). He gave up and threw a KKR480 + eBay manifold on it and a microtech lt8 tuned by PA, makes like 170kW on 8psi with 12.5:1 AFR, reliable, economical and safe as pie (quite underpowered imo but still pretty quick with its 4.11's and it was early days with tuner too scared to run high boost on unopened N/A + T even though it drove in on 12psi/165kW with limp-home-tune).

If you nistuned it yourself you'd net a bit more power and way better economy as you could lean the mixtures more ideally to suit N/A application (like ~ 13.2 at low throttle/airflow & ~ 12.5:1 at WOT) since RB30's rely heavily on thier airflow table at light throttle rather than 02 sensor like the twin cams, this is where the difference in economy generally comes from.

Nistuning it is also future proofing for turbo, you can just plug it into a laptop and change AFM/injectors with the click of a button, even more appropriate cam maps (like for GTS2 spec).

I honestly wouldn’t bother twin camming, a good tune will negate most benefits, a mild cam will pick the revs up and a turbo will bring on the power. Nistune $500, Cam $200 (and 2 hours tops) then down the track, factory vlt injectors, vlt manifold, vlt turbo and front pipe, rb25 bottom dump (will bolt straight up to front pipe and to your exhaust) and bam, ~ 165kW on 10-12psi like every other RB30e+t and cheap as chips. Tune will push it up to ~ 180-200 where you might hit airflow meter limit which is easily fixed by Z32 as they use the same plug!

/wall of text yarn

cheers for the advice dan.

i reckon il laim for a nistune first up, get it tuned. then later on boost it with some stock vlt gear.

ive heard that changing the cam requires that the lifter be changed/replaced as well? is this true?

I did the cam in my old RB30et wagon and just gave the lifters a clean, never had any lifter noise or issues, but i hear its recommended.

While the car is N/A you could give it a home tune and sneak a few extra ponies, low risk and better economy. With a supported wideband O2 you could get it to tune its self to some decent WOT mixtures...

10kw more is a lot when you're only starting at 90kw.

my thoughts exactly, its a good 10% increase...

and at around $100/kw gained its "cheap" for n/a tuning gains.

especially considering it gives me overhead for turbo tuning later.

It's still buggerall when you're starting at 1300kg.

Small displacement engine, super quick throttle response, or lots of torque - pick two of these, because you wont get all three...not without spending copious amounts of money anyway.

Im doing the same project for my brothers first car.

Just finished fixing the gearbox and its all up and running with pod and extracters.

He is only on his restricted so im keeping it NA for the moment but once he gets his full ill be +t'ing it for him.

Nistune was a bit expensive and I already own a licence for CROME (honda tuning program) so I wrote a script to read/write the RB30E and T maps. It also works in the free version of CROME and supports SR20DET and RB20DET so far, Planing to add more in future as I come across more ECUs.

Password to extract is "bmgjet.com"

Feel free to try it out, It doesnt do as much as nistune but its a work in progress still and iv had some success with it so far.

Its only making 115KW but the engine is a bit tired 190,000K, Was hoping for 120kwish but the SOHC must flow worse then I thought.

I was a bit disapointed since my old 1.6L NA made 125KW and my 1.2L on 21psi makes 147kw.

Crome Nissan Support Plugin0.01e.zip

no, sort of came out wrong, I mean with datalogging and real time cell selection with wideband output.

read this guy;

http://www.plmsdevelopments.com/files/nissan_ecu_tuning_basics.pdf

There is heaps of info here;

http://www.nistune.com/support-documentation-general.php

Some good reads :P.

no, sort of came out wrong, I mean with datalogging and real time cell selection with wideband output.

read this guy;

http://www.plmsdevel...ning_basics.pdf

There is heaps of info here;

http://www.nistune.c...ion-general.php

Some good reads :P.

Those links are a good read, Read them a while back.

For real time cell tracing and stuff Iv been using a ostrich. The dyno I use also has a full datalogging setup where it can take all the readings from the sensors its self once its plugged into the loom between the ecu.

I own a 31 with a rb30e... been down a similar path when I first got the car. Luckily enough, some locals from the 31 club talked some sense into me.

Bottom line is, for the money, is it worth it? No... do not do it.

The best you can do for your 30e without going turbo / opening up the motor is this:

extractors, 2.5" exhaust

+20 ignition timing and use premium fuel.

Leave the engine at that, it is seriously the biggest waste of time doing anything else, waste of not only time but money, it is simply not cost effective and you will be dissapointed.

Even opening up the engine and working the n/a 30e is a waste of time that yields nothing special.

Exhaust + premium + ignition advance is the best thing you can do for your car, and yes, it does have noticable gains, more noticable then any ECU / chip will show you.

I own a 31 with a rb30e... been down a similar path when I first got the car. Luckily enough, some locals from the 31 club talked some sense into me.

Bottom line is, for the money, is it worth it? No... do not do it.

The best you can do for your 30e without going turbo / opening up the motor is this:

extractors, 2.5" exhaust

+20 ignition timing and use premium fuel.

Leave the engine at that, it is seriously the biggest waste of time doing anything else, waste of not only time but money, it is simply not cost effective and you will be dissapointed.

Even opening up the engine and working the n/a 30e is a waste of time that yields nothing special.

Exhaust + premium + ignition advance is the best thing you can do for your car, and yes, it does have noticable gains, more noticable then any ECU / chip will show you.

i belive this really all depends on your expectations...

if you modify an rb30e and expect it to perform like an M3 then prepare to be disapointed.

if you modify an rb30e and expect it to perform like a commodore preapre to be pleased. ^.^

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
×
×
  • Create New...