Jump to content
SAU Community

  

40 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

So I was reading on a website that when this crazy p-plater gave his car a bit, he/she pushed the car past the limits of the speedo, doing roughly 200km/h, and his/her car started to make a funny noise that was hard to describe.

Apparently it's a sort of buzzing noise.

Is this a limiter or can the engine seriously not go faster than this?

What's limiting the engine from going faster?

Also, should I get a banana bread with my coffee this morning?

Edited by SKITTLES
  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

haha- good luck with this one mate, i can see people trying to f**k you up the arse for even asking this one.. But too me, i would think a na rb wouldnt have too much past 200. Probably comes down to gearing etc, but i think real world its probably got not too much more. And yeah man, b-bread is the shit, once you start you wont go back haha

I got there, had epic heart burn, struggled with coffee so I got a toasted ham/cheese crossaint. Banana bread can be tomorrow when i get paid :)

> i can see people trying to f**k you up the arse for even asking this one..

So can I, but it's a valid question.

I can imagine you're right about it being an issue with gearing, apparently this guy was revving out to 6k in 4th gear to get to around 170 then into 5th, but once it was in fifth it didn't go to like 4k or shit it went to 5k and went back to around 6k after passing the 180.

It wasn't hitting the rev limiter.

Can anyone explain how the gearbox things work?

If I were to change the gears so that they were longer or something, but kept the engine the same, would there be a performance issue with acceleration?

Would it be a case of faster top-end, slower acceleration?

If I had a turbo with longer gears, would the power then give me a better acceleration and top end?

Just trying to wrap my head around things :)

What your saying about it not getting any more in fifth is pretty standard i would assume.. I know when i was an enthusiastic p-plater (idiot driver haha) and i max speed ran my bommodore, it hit 200 in third, then when it hit 4th (overdrive, auto) it was still 200, but at like 3000rpm and wouldnt go any higher.. it actually kept dropping back to third.

I think the issue is that the na engine doesnt have enough torque to keep it revving out the last gear, that and the fact the last gear is very long in order to keep the rpm low at highway cruising.. I would assume a turbo model would pull all the way to redline in final gear.

So it doesnt have a limiter ??

I know my 32 (auto) is limited to 180 and definetly wont go any higher then that.

Even at 180 it physically doesnt feel like it could get much higher then 200 (although a rb25de would have a bit more grunt then the shitty rb20de).

LOL at just how sh!t how the RB25DE motors are.

My E46 BMW was a 2.5L straight-6 making roughly 150-160 rear-wheel horsepower and I hit 240km/h......didn't take too long to get to 200, but then it took a bit to get to 240.....and that was on a dead straight/flat road.

I even ran it down the 1/4 mile, ran a 15.1. The only performance-enhancing mod on my E46 was a full 3" exhaust system with no cats. Never had it on the dyno, so not sure of exact horsepower/torque figures, but there was an evident torque gain with the full exhaust system.

Also, banana bread if f*kin awesome. Remember, sharing is caring :)

I got there, had epic heart burn, struggled with coffee so I got a toasted ham/cheese crossaint. Banana bread can be tomorrow when i get paid :)

> i can see people trying to f**k you up the arse for even asking this one..

So can I, but it's a valid question.

I can imagine you're right about it being an issue with gearing, apparently this guy was revving out to 6k in 4th gear to get to around 170 then into 5th, but once it was in fifth it didn't go to like 4k or shit it went to 5k and went back to around 6k after passing the 180.

It wasn't hitting the rev limiter.

Can anyone explain how the gearbox things work?

If I were to change the gears so that they were longer or something, but kept the engine the same, would there be a performance issue with acceleration?

Would it be a case of faster top-end, slower acceleration?

If I had a turbo with longer gears, would the power then give me a better acceleration and top end?

Just trying to wrap my head around things :)

Gearing is always a compromise. You can have a gearbox that will accelerate unbelivably quick but will only reach 140kmh. Or you can have slow acceleration with a top speed of 300kmh (and risk never getting there)

You need power to overcome wind resistance (Drag) and there is an element of mechanical drag as well from the moving parts along the driveline.

This is why the Bugatti Veyron can go 400km/h and your car can not lol. Lots and lots of power, and long gearing.

In racing the idea is to get the gearing right so you are in top gear right near the limiter on the longest straight/fastest part of the track. When I used to do karting, I had to change sprockets to get the right gearing. In Formula 1 they do the same thing with the gear ratios for the different tracks (There will be a Monza spec gear set, Bahrain spec gear set etc etc). If you've been watching this year with the Drag Reduction rear wings they are hitting redline early on the straights because they have to keep a good gearing for the race where they cant use the DRS for the whole track

Thats enough talking

  • 2 weeks later...

Gearing is always a compromise. You can have a gearbox that will accelerate unbelivably quick but will only reach 140kmh. Or you can have slow acceleration with a top speed of 300kmh (and risk never getting there)

You need power to overcome wind resistance (Drag) and there is an element of mechanical drag as well from the moving parts along the driveline.

This is why the Bugatti Veyron can go 400km/h and your car can not lol. Lots and lots of power, and long gearing.

In racing the idea is to get the gearing right so you are in top gear right near the limiter on the longest straight/fastest part of the track. When I used to do karting, I had to change sprockets to get the right gearing. In Formula 1 they do the same thing with the gear ratios for the different tracks (There will be a Monza spec gear set, Bahrain spec gear set etc etc). If you've been watching this year with the Drag Reduction rear wings they are hitting redline early on the straights because they have to keep a good gearing for the race where they cant use the DRS for the whole track

Thats enough talking

Exactly right - wind resistance increases roughly exponentially once you start going above 105km/h. High speed you need more horspower.

LOL at just how sh!t how the RB25DE motors are.

My E46 BMW was a 2.5L straight-6 making roughly 150-160 rear-wheel horsepower and I hit 240km/h......didn't take too long to get to 200, but then it took a bit to get to 240.....and that was on a dead straight/flat road.

Even my mum's auto Camry (3L V6 version) could top out ~200km/h, although it would take ages to get there...

Not that im proud to have been apart of it, and it was f**king scary, my mate had his excel 195. We were however typical 17 year old douchbags. lol

It also took forever and had a downhill run- but still not bad.

i got about 160kmh on 5000rpm gear 5, don't know if it would go any faster the car was vibrating lots

That's not that amazing tbh. I've heard of people hitting around 4500-5000rpm in 4th gear at 170 in a bone stock car.

Not that im proud to have been apart of it, and it was f**king scary, my mate had his excel 195. We were however typical 17 year old douchbags. lol

It also took forever and had a downhill run- but still not bad.

my friend reckons he took his mums excel to 220 or something on a freeway.. they take a fair beating.

I took mine to 180 when I was 17. Totally not worth it.

my friend reckons he took his mums excel to 220 or something on a freeway.. they take a fair beating.

I took mine to 180 when I was 17. Totally not worth it.

haha- definitely not! The thing rattled and shook so much we took up two lanes.. My dick attempts in my commodore only got me 200- but at least it was smooth lol

The Power required to overcome the aerodynamic drag is given by:e31430f0898268091f410282a89503b1.pngNote that the power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. A car cruising on a highway at 50 mph (80 km/h) may require only 10 horsepower (7.5 kW) to overcome air drag, but that same car at 100 mph (160 km/h) requires 80 hp (60 kW). With a doubling of speed the drag (force) quadruples per the formula. Exerting four times the force over a fixed distance produces four times as much work. At twice the speed the work (resulting in displacement over a fixed distance) is done twice as fast. Since power is the rate of doing work, four times the work done in half the time requires eight times the power.

In short, you go twice as fast, you need 4 times the power. But because you've doubled the speed, you're hitting twice the amount of air, so you really need 8 times the power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok glad you clarified on the frenchy’s options , I was worried about if my oem hoses would fit the new compressor or not if I just bought the bracket/compressor kit ,  didn’t realize they also sold a larger full conversion kit. Hmm may just go oem in that case then to make it easy only because I plan to sell this car to upgrade to a 32 GTR or 34 GTT.
    • Right, here's a video of the basic operation at least.  This is what you can expect day to day when you turn the car on and it boots from standby.  The only thing from a media point of view I haven't gotten working is for it to autoplay plexamp when it turns on from standby (it works from cold boot) but that's more of a plexamp problem as it will autoplay other music players.  Also attached is my one stray cable.  It's part of the screen's wiring adapters but there's just nowhere for it to go in my car.  I've just now done a bit of research and found a matching port on a 2010-2014 head unit with BOSE.  Mine has no BOSE so that's that case pretty much closed I think.  Plugging in the Infiniti AC panel basically did nothing for me, so that's a dead end as well.  Next port of call is to mess with this CANBUS module and see what I can find from it.  I found this resource containing the DBC files for a 2010+ G37 : https://github.com/icecube45/Dash_InfinitiG37/blob/master/InfinitiG37.dbc I'll now have something to go from when I try to extract my CANBUS data so I can see if the HVAC Mode, Fan Speed, Temperature, etc. match and also the gear shifter position.  It's a pretty big assumption that it's just mismatched CAN signals but considering all the devices in the CAN network are talking to each other (AC can be fully adjusted just with no info on screen) it might be a safe one.  I will report back WhatsApp Video 2025-02-26 at 12.49.10.mp4
    • Thanks for that Paul.  Do you think if I posted a picture you'd be able to remember where it went? 
    • Sorry Duncan, I didn't get a notification for the replies.  Thanks for responding!  It's a full Android device, but does allow you to use CarPlay/AA as well.  This is the one I bought from NaviRS on AliExpress: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006368602668.html?spm=a2g0o.order_list.order_list_main.111.59aa1802JDzQ0E - the 2K 8G-256G CAM variant but it seems to have gone up by £170 since I bought it!  My purchase was £307.14.   It's not the fastest thing in the world but performs perfectly adequately.  It stays on standby unless I disconnect the battery and let it power down, then it's just a fairly standard Android bootup time from cold.  The DSP Equaliser is very nice and made the standard stereo system sound pretty decent compared to the stock screen.  Perhaps I can take a video of it when I get a sec. It *allegedly* supports the reverse camera, but I'm yet to get that working.  It has options for reverse cam (a camera unit can be bought separately) or 360 cameras (also bought separately).  To be fair it doesn't seem to detect that the shifter was put into reverse but I'm working on a theory about this as well.  At the moment I'm going without which is a bit annoying considering the car is an absolute canal barge but so far I haven't caused any damage I'll grab a picture of the wire I'm missing later today when I can get outside.  My theory, by the by, is that not only is the head unit different, but the CANBUS network has different signals for the different years.  I think this because I have a spare AC panel from a newer Infiniti G37 (as opposed to my Nissan panel) which wouldn't control anything except the volume when I had it wired up with the stock system.  I'm going to throw it back in and see if the screen will respond to it.  I've just ordered an arduino CANBUS module so I can have a look at the signals going around the car and see if I can spot anything.  I'm thinking if I can work out what it's expecting vs what it's getting I might be able to translate and relay the signal back but so far just a theory anyway. I also found this on my travels, so far the only one that specifically matches my car: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002822934280.html?spm=a2g0s.imconversation.0.0.33433e5fgttovi If you look at the picture of the before, it has the card reader slot, and the picture of the head unit is exactly the same as the one pictured in my original post.  I asked if they sell the cables separately but sadly they won't.  I didn't want to just buy this one because it's a super old Android version and only dual core - likely slow as hell. 
    • As above, you did refill the coolant and burp the system before running it again didn't you?
×
×
  • Create New...