Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Recently completed my DE+T, as a result, set the timing to ~12 degrees BTDC from ~15 BTDC for a run-in period (using a Snap-On timing light, on the wire loop near the ignitor, with the TPS disconnected, coolant temp at 83 degrees).

Car is running about 5psi, straight off the actuator, plumbed into the turbo outlet.

Has now been running smooth for a week, so decided to try advancing the timing to get better fuel economy and power.

Tonight, advanced it back to ~15 BTDC (as above) and the car feels like the timing is way out, gets onto boost but just doesn't "move" and is generally sluggish. Switched it off for a few minutes, re-started, same thing. Back to my work. re-set it to ~13 BTDC and took it for another spin, much much better and more responsive.

Everything I've read both on here and the engine manual says that to advance the timing, rotate the CAS ANTI-CLOCKWISE when looking at the front of the car. This corresponds to the timing moving on the balancer. Have gone from just "right" of the 2nd mark from the TDC orange mark (~12), up to the third mark where the car felt slow (~15), now back to roughly the middle of the 2nd and 3rd marks. (~13).

Have I simply found the mark of "peak torque" at the current setting with nothing to gain with more advance?

Any advice? Other than but a GTST?

Mods:

-Stock GTS RB25de

-Platinum plugs, yellowjackets, walbro fuel pump, BP Ultimate

-Stock R34 turbo, stock R33 GTST exhaust, ECU, injectors, SMIC

Edited by blk94r33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364746-advanced-timing-car-feels-slower/
Share on other sites

ECU is probably going going into the knock map at 15deg advance

My thoughts also, I read somewhere that the ECU uses the knock sensors to switch between high and low ignition maps, rather than actively change the timing?

Thus the reason I stopped and restarted the car, yet it still felt crap?

I'm looking to get the timing set properly, checked for knock, A/F checked and a power run within a week, just thought it was a bit strange?

almost certainly going into the low octane knock map, the ecu just saved you possible holes in your pistons!

if you want to advance the timing get someone to tune it properly, it'll last forever and get better results.

Edited by Rolls

buy a GTST or get a real stand alone ECU

you needs lots of control and extra precision given its N/A with a turbo on top

you have to juggle the compression and extra intake temp

recommend powerfc

buy a GTST or get a real stand alone ECU

you needs lots of control and extra precision given its N/A with a turbo on top

you have to juggle the compression and extra intake temp

recommend powerfc

That's the long term plan. At the moment with the timing set to ~12-13, i'm getting consistent 11L/100km on around town tanks! Which is probably a 1-2 L/100km gain over N/A minus the horrible 3500ish rpm rattle.

Until I can get the car on a dyno and checked for knock properly, or decent engine management and proper tune, i'll just leave the timing where it is... blush.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have the option to do this. Nobody but me ever did this (go slower, I mean) Everyone seems to fall victim to "This would be a great setup for you, but for me, I need a little more power..."
    • Save yourself the headache of an alarm. Immobilizer on the signal side of the main EFI relays so it won't start is good enough. DIY killswitch is the same thing except instead of a nice passive system you need to remember to switch it on and off.
    • Yeah, the advent of canbus was supposed to cut down on wiring weight, then some bright marketing wonk says "oh, look at all these wonderful tech gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some arsehole safety legislator says "oh, look at all the wonderful surveillance and tracking gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some dipshit young engineer who has grown up thinking that an extra 500000 lines of code is not a problem because storage is cheap these days says "oh look at all this wonderful shit I can do to one up those dipshit arsholes over at VW" and the Karens of the world all go "oh look at all these fancy things I can do on my screen (so long as I am not driving on a bumpy road wherein touch screens immediately become the single most stupid shit idea ever shoveled into a car) and my 19 zone airconditioning keeps my sweaty fat folds a bit less damp and the windows close themselves because I'm too fat and lazy to wind them up for myself and these reversing sensors would have been great if I'd paid attention to them instead of smashing them on the bollard while I was reversing and staring fixedly forward that day I went to pick up little Charlize from ballet" and the sweaty mongoloids who say "oh this wonderful collision avoidance technology with these 45 excellent radar antennae scattered across the front of my car mean I can tailgate like a methed up tradie at full speed with no fear because the car and the 35 airbags will protect me if it all goes wrong" ...... </shallistopranting?>
    • There's a post from a member (can't recall who), went down the path of a twin scroll G30-660 and it's doing over 300kW+ AND comes on about the same as a high flow RB25DET turbo. Have your cake and eat it too in this case. TBH, if I had a 2nd chance of building my car again (i.e. someone gave me what I wanted for my shit box, but the deal was I had to re-build another R33 and keep the change) I would just pop in a stock NEO motor (with new seals, rod bearings, ARP studs, head gasket, sump, Nitto pump), get a smaller twin scroll turbo, modify the stock low mount (keep the divider in place), and make a solid 300kW on 98RON and call it a day. 
×
×
  • Create New...