Jump to content
SAU Community

Nismo Group A/le Mans Turbos

Granthem
 Share

Recommended Posts

Granthem Mentor

Granthem

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hi guys I have for sale twin Nismo turbos suit GTR.

One turbo needs a rebuild, so perhaps you would just get both overhauled.

After doing some research on the nismo turbos I have found out that the part number is 14411-06U00:

That corresponds with the following data I have tracked down.

32Nismo (14411-06U00) T04B T3 44.6 - 60.1 62T 0.42 T25 T25 41.7 - 53.0 CD790 .64 15° 270°~600PS

HOWEVER. The front housings are not .42A/R. The are .60A/R... which after some more tracking I believe might be off the Nismo LeMans turbos

Nismo GT/le mans (14411-RS581) T04B T3 55T 0.60 T25 T25 CD790 .64 15° 360°~640PS

So therefore it is difficult to tell exactly what the hell these are. I believe they started out as Nismo Group A's, but run the larger Nismo Le Man front housing.

Info from this site - http://homepage.ntlworld.com/tbroom/Turbos.htm

All I know if they seem to be suited for lots of boost, and are quite large.

TO4B wheel - .60A/R front - .64 A/R rear housing.

Price is $450 - open to offers.

Also have apexi (not stamped but whole exhaust was apexi branded) stainless split dumps suit above turbos (or any stock GTR turbos) for sale..

img03681305772939.jpg

Edited by Granthem
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364812-nismo-group-ale-mans-turbos/
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Granthem Mentor

Granthem

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Its not that they arent strong stock. An oil starvation occured on the blow turbo, destroying the bearings.

Postage I assume would be around $50 as a guess, maybe slightly more.

I'm happy to chase up postage costs, but I work a busy schedule and would need to know you're dead serious before I went through all the effort. Hope you understand.

SWITZER Enthusiast

SWITZER

Posted
Posted

I got a pair of these bad boys on my 32 gtr came from japan with them was told i had standard turbos till i pulled off all

the pipe work to check them out and see why i wasnt hitting full boost till 5000rpm i also did a bit of research on them and

found them 2 be a group a /le mans mash up with .60 front housing apparently it was quite common back in the day in japan

to get the group a's and swap the front housing to .60 to match the size of the le mans but a lot cheaper cause the le mans were

f*king expensive and this was a cheaper alternative mine are still going strong and i make 300kw at the treads on 18psi

just thought id add some info :D

GTR_JOEY Grand Master

GTR_JOEY

Posted
Posted (edited)

I had some lemans on my old set up, they are a bit laggy but come on like a freight train... Can get good power out of them, lag can be reduced with a good exhaust/ tune.... Was seeing 20psi at around 4500 ish

Edited by GTR_JOEY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • turbo76lx
      Torana Lx Gtr Hatch, Lots Of Pictures

      By turbo76lx · Posted

      Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • rahilp
      Requirements for Xenon Headlights? (Possible Solution)

      By rahilp · Posted

      Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • r32-25t
      R32 Gtr Long Term Love, Now Project

      By r32-25t · Posted

      Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • ARB26
      Stagea 260RS seats

      By ARB26 · Posted

      Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • Lithium
      Forced Performance Hta Turbos

      By Lithium · Posted

      I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...