Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just so people can see, here is the launch control on the Vipec. As you can see there are a lot of things to play around with and a lot of options.

post-35676-0-48760100-1306147579_thumb.jpg

*Please note: Those are not my settings, they are just the default values from the base map. I have played around with it a little bit, but not much. Having balled tyres makes trying to set up launch control a bit pointless :P

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ye i knew what you meant, just too hard to reply in depth from my phone

But with a PFC - You won't be able to get the "staged" launch control where boost is varied against Speed/RPM. So sorta complicating it a little but it is possible. I guess its the one thing Phil didn't mention in the "Launch Control" summary :)

I believe the ViPec/Link and no doubt other ECU's have the Auxilary inputs that you can map/configure with a boost controller and then be variable against Speed / RPM / Boost

Or perhaps launch control like a man - with the right foot :teehee:

??

I always thought without an ecu thats capable of "launch control", you can never manually launch with boost. Am I wrong?

post-27276-0-70791100-1306147720_thumb.j

:O :O :O

Something is going going on man, 2.3 60ft (I'm assuming you are left).

I am not convinced of you having 250rwkw on that particular day. Your time slip should look more like the one on the right!

I was going to say maybe you backed off, but your half track time tells me you did not.

I'm stumped...

??

I always thought without an ecu thats capable of "launch control", you can never manually launch with boost. Am I wrong?

What i mean by "staged" is as you leave the line, you can control things. I count it as launch control, probably a little incorrectly, but it "aids" in the launch.

1st Gear - 14psi max

2nd Gear - 16psi max

Or maybe...

4500rpm - Max 16psi

6500rpm - Max 20psi

Just depending on what you use as an Aux input as. So you can then reference and configure based upon that.

:O :O :O

Something is going going on man, 2.3 60ft (I'm assuming you are left).

I am not convinced of you having 250rwkw on that particular day. Your time slip should look more like the one on the right!

I was going to say maybe you backed off, but your half track time tells me you did not.

I'm stumped...

!!

federal 595ss 235/40/18

For that size tyre etc, your 60ft actually isn't too bad at all. You dont have much sidewall to play with, and the tyres are skinny.

Are you perhaps restricting to 7000rpm and falling off boost with a gear change or something?

Or taking a while inbetween gear changes?

thats the only one with close to that 60ft, i think one other was 2.5 rest were 2.6 2.7.

The limiter is at 7k, i think i hit it in 1st but not the rest, the dyno graph shows no boost drop....... dunno!

there is a problem in the system some where now, no idea of how big or how small it is, was not pulling as hard on sunday as it did on friday and there seems to be another slightly different noise when boosting, still has the same whistle but now it also has something like a whistle but a bit more dull as well, will pull all the induction off this weekend and check things out.

I also didnt bother changing tyre pressure as its a street car and i wanted to see how it went in the same trim that is in every day of the week, as i have read a few times since then, there seems to be more traction on the street than at calder, just want to get the f**ker out of the hole better more often!

I also had not really practiced launching it much on the street, in fact the first real go i gave it was on the way to calder leaving a set of lights at the start of the freeway, that resulted in a loud pop in 3rd gear and a ball of flames that i could see over the top of my gtr spoiler in the rear vision mirror, 1.5 hours later and new clamp bought and installed we were on our way again!

2.3 isn't overtly bad mate if you can keep replicating it, given the tyre size and you don't have much sidewall to play with even if you did let them down.

I think if you can get consistent 2.3, and find out if you do have car gremlins - get them fixed there is no reason you can get a low 13 / high 12.

I was getting 1.9 - 2.1 with 225/60R16, so i could let them down to 22psi (best for traction i found) and get it down from 2.3

You don't really have that luxury with 18s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...