Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm after some performance points.....and I like the ones that come without a downside (besides money).

So anyway I have ~230rwkw, a nice dump pipe and exhaust (Fujitsubo twin 2.5") but I remember I bought a ceramic cat cause I only had a stock turbo back then. So, should I now fit a high flow 100 cell metal cat?

If I replaced the cat with a metal cat would I even notice where my $400 went? Anybody got some dyno numbers to back up claims?

Seem that the 3" outlet/inlet with 4" 100 cell biscuit is the go.

Edited by simpletool
  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365294-catsdo-they-make-a-difference/
Share on other sites

Look around for a larger stock cat at a exhaust shop waste bin, lots of people replace the cats on 5.7 ltr GM cars, it may flow well enough for your power levels and cost not much to nothing.

ahh ha. Found a dyno comparison after some searching. Makes about a 4% improvement from a ceramic cat and about a 3% drop from a straight pipe. Gain of 14whp on an Evo that started with 300whp (gains over entire curve).

http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-engine-turbo-drivetrain/330000-ceramic-cat-vs-100-cell-metal-substrate-cat.html

Just a dumb ass question guys....

How do you tell if your cat is a highflow?

I have a 3"exhaust and have no idea about the cat..was already on there sorta looks like a standard one but in a 3" variety. can you get them checked? apart from looking at the cells...

Dazza

id say that apart from making little difference at the wheels, the only reason i would be changing to to a metal CAT is they are less likely to "meltdown". if a heap of raw fuel is punched down the exhaust and ignites and melts the monolith, then ofcourse going from a pile of melted (blocked) mess to a highflow you will notice a difference.

also metal CATs are arent known for cracking up and coming apart like ceramic CATs, including impact damage for those who like their cars low and their CATs eating speedhumps and driveways

I dont think that you'll be noticing much difference.

pull your cat out and see how it looks, if you can see light through it then its going to flow well. the only time a cat is going to cause and issue is if it is collapsed.

as far as people saying you gain 30kw going to straight pipe, its probably on cars with well over 300kw. and maybe their cat wasnt flowing well enough and causing a restriction.

but at 230kw a 3in highflow cat should be fine even up to over 300kw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...