Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1060927_bmw-front-wheel-drive-car-spy-shots

Man this really sux. I miss the old BMW. If this thing drops under $30K, every hipster wannabe will driving around in this. I remember BMW was actually a brand you'd want to strive for. Now it's just like a VW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/366491-bmws-front-wheel-drive-car-spied/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Like is basically said in the articles, its for people who buy BMW's on name only, the sort of dickheads (80% apparently) who didn't even know it was rear wheel drive.

It will be gay on wheels just like every other front wheel drive in existence.

Nothing wrong with well engineered FWD cars. This car is designed for the road anyway - unless you're pushing the limits of the car on a racetrack, where should the FWD vs RWD debate even come into it? Not everyone wants to be a drift king / burnout hero. Most people (including an overwhelming majority of FWD haters) wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a FWD and RWD when they are driving either around town.

I'm sure BMW marketing won't make the mistake of screwing with their brand image by producing something on the cheap. Even if it's sub 30k, that's a lot of money for a hatch the size of a Hyundai. I'd expect the same BMW quality and drive, even if the equipment level isn't up to scratch with the rest of the BMW range.

Maybe not the greatest examples, but while I was driving a VT daily, took my fiance's mum's 2010 Lancer for a drive up to get some Maccas, and driving sensibly (since not my car) I noticed a huge difference in handling, hated the Lancer and just re-affirmed to me why I dislike FWD.

Yeah that's a pretty bad example lol, completely different cars! :)

I too am not a fan of how Lancers handle, but it has more to do with the suspension than the FWD. That said, they aren't a front wheel drive engineered for performance either. Those that are will have biases in the suspension and an intermediate driveshaft running across the back of the engine.

An Integra Type R would own a VT in the handling and enjoyment department. While you're at it you might as well write off the WRX too because it handles like a FWD... And the Integra Type R was far more of a driver's car.

Depends on the car more than anything.

There are plenty that you won't find enjoyable. But you have to look at it with a bit of scrutiny...most FWD are cheapo little hatchbacks that were never designed to handle well. They are just around town A-B cars, like the Lancer. As Matt said, if you drive some of the more performance oriented FWD cars you'll probably find them every bit as enjoyable unless you want to drift or do burnouts.

I know where this thread is going to end up, I can even see Warps replying lol but,

The only reason manufacturers go to/went to FWD layout's is it is cheaper and more compact, there are no other real benefits and yes Birds I reckon if you were blind folded you could tell the differences in drive train.

Nothing wrong with well engineered FWD cars. This car is designed for the road anyway - unless you're pushing the limits of the car on a racetrack, where should the FWD vs RWD debate even come into it? Not everyone wants to be a drift king / burnout hero. Most people (including an overwhelming majority of FWD haters) wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a FWD and RWD when they are driving either around town.

I'm sure BMW marketing won't make the mistake of screwing with their brand image by producing something on the cheap. Even if it's sub 30k, that's a lot of money for a hatch the size of a Hyundai. I'd expect the same BMW quality and drive, even if the equipment level isn't up to scratch with the rest of the BMW range.

Yep, I'd expect the same interior quality and drive/ride balance of the 1-series. ie. pretty poor. I highly doubt BMW can make a good low priced car. The Aussie mark-up, the fixed costs of the company, the existing supplier base are all based around a higher priced product and all point to an inability to produce a competitive cheap product vs the Japanese.

I think it'll be good in some areas.....but pretty poor overall for the money....ala 1-series (barring the big engine models).

Now hopefully they prove me wrong because there are only a handful of car companies that keep my faith in modern cars and BMW is one of them. I hope I don't have to add them to the recently binned list with Toyota.

Edited by simpletool

Like is basically said in the articles, its for people who buy BMW's on name only, the sort of dickheads (80% apparently) who didn't even know it was rear wheel drive.

Majority of Asians (Chinese) are doing that already, I know of plenty family friends (all Chinese Mums & dads) driving around in their taxi 318is & acting like they are rich bastards with 'high society status' because they own a Beemer.

Nothing wrong with FWD tbh.

I personally loved my clio 197 when i had it, and i loved the megane 250RS when i had the chance to test drive the car. They handle well, a different sort of car to my GT-R, but they are still fun cars, that i would love to own here, if not for the ridiculous renault sump plug and having to reset the computer every service.

But they were well engineered sport hatchbacks.

FWD is just a matter of how you drive it, isnt it? Normally Beemers dont put out near enough power to do anything anyway, other than the real sport versions.

The only reason manufacturers go to/went to FWD layout's is it is cheaper and more compact

Cheaper, more compact, less cabin intrusion, lower drivetrain loss. In a passenger car where chassis balance and steering feel aren't prioritised, they're not bad things.

Still, I'm surpised BMW is cheapening its brand this way by going bum dragging. Then again, they were always the NA car company that started building pretty good turbo cars. And the New Mini actually steers pretty damned well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...