Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They aren't cheapening their image, just entering another market segment. This thing will still be expensive for what it is, which is what the Euro luxo brands are all about. Mercedes did it with the A class and it didn't impact the rest of their range. I imagine BMW are aiming squarely at the Golf and other Euro FWD hatches. If anything it will boost up the profiles of the rest of the BMW range, by pushing the 3 class as an intermediate market entry, when it used to be the base model / poor man's Beamer.

jus sayin

They aren't cheapening their image, just entering another market segment. Mercedes did it with the A class and it didn't impact the rest of their range. I imagine they are aiming squarely at the Golf.

I agree and plus think of all the hipsters and Asians who will buy them so they can think they are top shit. Definetly a brilliant financial move by BMW and they will still have the 1,3,5 and 7 series for people who want a proper RWD BMW. Although with the cheapness of the new FWD models it may kill off the 1 series, because it is mostly bought by people with delusions of grandeur who just want the badge.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I like it, mainly for the reason that it bumps up the 1 series from its 'bottom' position. 1M coupe is drool-worthy. I ache to drive one!!

Hope they ditch the bread van body style from the 1 series too, and just leave the hatch to the car that was meant to be a hatch.

Nothing wrong with FWD tbh.

I personally loved my clio 197 when i had it, and i loved the megane 250RS when i had the chance to test drive the car. They handle well, a different sort of car to my GT-R, but they are still fun cars, that i would love to own here, if not for the ridiculous renault sump plug and having to reset the computer every service.

But they were well engineered sport hatchbacks.

FWD is just a matter of how you drive it, isnt it? Normally Beemers dont put out near enough power to do anything anyway, other than the real sport versions.

+1 RenaultSports are great FWD cars, right back to the Clio Williams. I've got a Clio 172 ('02) and it's quite a different feel to the car compared with the GTR (just talking about the chassis and drivetrain layout) but it's still fun to drive after getting out of the GTR.

Potentially, this will eat into Honda's market share, as there seems to be tons of people who drive Civics who wish they were driving bimmers instead and rice it up accordingly with chrome, cheap-ass aftermarket xenons and larger rims...

As a bit of a BMW fanboy I'm not quite sure what to make of it; the original "2002" BMW was not exactly a luxury car but was a fun to drive, sporty, stylish coupe priced slightly above the average car - this could be BMW having it both ways, returning to its roots while retaining the rest of the luxury range.

you can drive out of a corner in the wet and nail the throttle in a FWD and it goes where you point it..

try doin that a RWD and u end up sideways..

for everyday driving FWDs are much more predictable and safe..but not as much fun..

As for BMWs being something special...people forget they're just Taxis in europe, sure some of the top end models are awesome but your average beamer is exactly that...average , the same goes for 80% of the euro rubbish it really isnt that special people just like the badge but really its just an expensive wank

you can drive out of a corner in the wet and nail the throttle in a FWD and it goes where you point it..

try doin that a RWD and u end up sideways..

for everyday driving FWDs are much more predictable and safe..but not as much fun..

As for BMWs being something special...people forget they're just Taxis in europe, sure some of the top end models are awesome but your average beamer is exactly that...average , the same goes for 80% of the euro rubbish it really isnt that special people just like the badge but really its just an expensive wank

Er, not exactly.

Nail the throttle in a corner, in the wet in a FWD and you end up wearing whatever you were pointed at. Understeer, yo.

fwdsucks.jpg

that's a whole other topic you're starting there Grey...short story is it depends on many factors including weight/power disparity and driver.

I always thought if you wanted a fwd bmw then just buy the new mini...

otherwise I wouldn't worry about how it looks, with the camo and styling cues I would say it will look a lot different.

do awd have better launch than rwd and fwd?

ultimately, for launch we are talking optimal solutions here RWD>AWD>FWD

That said, there are not many AWD cars in the super fast categories of drag racing to make this a definitive thing, depends on the circumstances, environment and equipment your using, same tyre, track surface, power temperature etc etc.

do awd have better launch than rwd and fwd?

Factory street cars, and all things equal, AWD and RWD tend to have better launches in that order. Once you get into super duper serious drag racing, it becomes RWD/FWD/AWD going by the current world record times for each category.

I would think since that since torque is split to more wheels, and thus less load on the tires, the AWD would have a better launch and thus a better 1/4mile.

but then you get more drivetrain losses in awd.. so. i dont know.

Why don't we get into mean, median and standard deviation drag racing time for each example? I think it's far too difficult to say one is better than the other, it's down to many factors.

The pragmatic point of view says that with decent powered cars the restrictions of surfaces and street tyres, the 4WD tends to get up on the rest... Unless you are mid engined, or rear engined with massive rears, generally underpowered on the tyres anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...