Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes agreed there are tons of factors involved, hence I say all things equal in the vehicles.

But given the ridiculous number of variables, I'd gauge it by the best of what people have actually achieved with each setup, for that is the only real determinant we have. It's not perfect, but real world results are what matters. It's no good saying AWD has better potential than RWD down the strip if we haven't been able to prove it yet. Until that happens it's just theory. One of the largely unacknowledged factors, for example, is that drag racing has always been a traditionally RWD motorsport...so with many more teams focusing on development for RWD applications, this will obviously effect what is being done for AWD in terms of improvement down the quarter.

Ridiculous but applicable hypothetical: if someone said to me and another person, make the fastest drag car you possibly can, winner gets a million bucks....my drivetrain choice would go RWD, FWD and AWD.

Most drag races happen at the traffic lights anyway...with cars that usually do anything from 12-17 second quarter miles...in which case...all wheel drive is pretty easy to get it going consistently quick.

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes agreed there are tons of factors involved, hence I say all things equal in the vehicles.

But given the ridiculous number of variables, I'd gauge it by the best of what people have actually achieved with each setup, for that is the only real determinant we have. It's not perfect, but real world results are what matters. It's no good saying AWD has better potential than RWD down the strip if we haven't been able to prove it yet. Until that happens it's just theory. One of the largely unacknowledged factors, for example, is that drag racing has always been a traditionally RWD motorsport...so with many more teams focusing on development for RWD applications, this will obviously effect what is being done for AWD in terms of improvement down the quarter.

Ridiculous but applicable hypothetical: if someone said to me and another person, make the fastest drag car you possibly can, winner gets a million bucks....my drivetrain choice would go RWD, FWD and AWD.

Most drag races happen at the traffic lights anyway...with cars that usually do anything from 12-17 second quarter miles...in which case...all wheel drive is pretty easy to get it going consistently quick.

AWD has it's advantages when your in a traction limited environment although I'm not just talking when its wet or your driving on gravel etc.

talking street redialed tyres on pretty much any car I would prefer AWD, with the benefits of each platform increasing with the level of power output your talking about.

I'll leave the rest of the discussion in the other thread for now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...