Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got a few questions about my RB30 TWIN CAM;

1/ going to be running E85 and going into the 400rwkw territory looking at 2000cc injectors - bosch 2000cc's? OR Injection dynamics 2000cc's? which one should i get?

2/ looking at getting aftermarket pulleys. but i am running Rb25 Ross harmonic balancer with Rb25 power steering pump/rb25 alternator & rb26 N1 water pump. can i purchase an off the shelf pulley kit for this? are rb25/rb26 pulleys the same?

looking at this http://www.ebay.com....=item27ba6a17ee

3/ im running a GTX35 T4 1.06 turbo on 6boost mani - for my exhaust im getting made up a 3.5inch dump to 4inch cat back? is this ok or should i keep it 3.5inch the whole way?

thanks guys,

Edited by BMYHOE
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/366859-few-questions-about-my-rb2630-setup/
Share on other sites

1 get ID's unless you can flow match the bosch injectors. ID1000 should be ok for only 400 rw kw

2 pretty sure RB26 use different pullies to RB26. Water pump and alternator should line up at the very least but the power steering wont

3 4'' all the way minimum. Finding good 4'' mufflers is a prick as they are all expensive, if you have to step down do it after the diff. You can also split it into a duel system but

there isnt always enough room

1 get ID's unless you can flow match the bosch injectors. ID1000 should be ok for only 400 rw kw

2 pretty sure RB26 use different pullies to RB26. Water pump and alternator should line up at the very least but the power steering wont

3 4'' all the way minimum. Finding good 4'' mufflers is a prick as they are all expensive, if you have to step down do it after the diff. You can also split it into a duel system but

there isnt always enough room

yeah just after some head room on injectors for later on so ill do the id2000's

ok i might just keep with standard pulleys just in case there are any problems.

with the exhaust i was looking at getting a custom muffler made so i can keep the noise minimal. also looking at the varex muffler. - thoughts on that?

Magnaflow make 3.5 and 4" mufflers, reasonably priced from Summit. 3.5" should be more than enough for 400rwkw with an open wastegate, but that being said 4" is a more common size so the bends tend to be easier to find and for that reason cheaper as well (I had a great deal of difficulty sourcing 3.5" bends).

I had my bosch 1600's flow tested with almost no measureable difference (less than 1/3 the price of ID's). You can be reasonably sure the plenum will be responsible for much larger variations than the injectors so if this is a major concern run an ecu capable of trimming fuel delivery to individual cylinders and run an egt on each exh manifold runner.

ok good to know, with the injectors ive been doing some homework and found most guys are using the id2000 which are ment tobe good for smooth idle etc..

was thinking 3.5inch dump then 4 inch cat back.... muffler im probly leaning toward varex for noise control when needed

There is a fair difference between the ID1000 and ID2000cc injectors in terms linerarity at the on opening time required for a closed loop idle. I have tryed tuning ID2000 on an EVOX(which will have almost identicle fuel requirements as a RB30) with the factory ECU and had issue getting to a closed loop idle even wtih e85. If you have a decent ECU make sure you set your min on time to around 1.5ms and just let it go rich. Make sure you get your dwell times correct which isn't allways the same as what is supplied with the injectors.

im using a haltech p2000 the lastest one, and with the tuning im going to a repuable tunner in sydney that is know for Rb30's etc.

also with the wideband 02 sensor should i put 1 or 2 in the dump pipe?

im using a haltech p2000 the lastest one, and with the tuning im going to a repuable tunner in sydney that is know for Rb30's etc.

also with the wideband 02 sensor should i put 1 or 2 in the dump pipe?

Best tuner in the world ain't going to be able to tune around the wrong combination of parts - I would run it by him b4 buying injectors.

1 get ID's unless you can flow match the bosch injectors. ID1000 should be ok for only 400 rw kw

yeah I wouldn't be so sure. I'm using ID 2000's (which are actually 2225cc) making 400kw on E85 @ 65% duty cycle. That's on a 2.8 with twin RS's. The idle is better with these than my old Sard 800's.

Best tuner in the world ain't going to be able to tune around the wrong combination of parts - I would run it by him b4 buying injectors.

ok i will double check with them but there seems to be lots of guys using them without any dramas

yeah I wouldn't be so sure. I'm using ID 2000's (which are actually 2225cc) making 400kw on E85 @ 65% duty cycle. That's on a 2.8 with twin RS's. The idle is better with these than my old Sard 800's.

Thats shite - By my calcs for a normal engine 2000cc injectors @43pi base pressure@65% duty you should be making making 650kw @ the wheels on a dyno dynamics dyno.

You've obviously got something wrong there. BTW most engine idle better with a richer idle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...