Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Four simple questions about boosting a RB25DET from a R33.

1, What is standard boost? 7psi

2, What is the maximum boost that the stock turbos can handle? (or what boost level should i keep it under) The answer to this question would vary from car to car. I had mine tuned on 12.5psi and it ran that for about 2 years without a problem, took it off due to upgrading the turbo. I have seen other mates car's turbo letting go at 10psi or slightly higher. Condition of the turbo matters as well but best not to go over 12psi (well thats what my tuner recommended at that time)

3, If I have a pod filter, slightly bigger SMIC and turbo back exhaust with sports catalyser, what boost will it naturally creap up to? 8psi'ish

4, Whats the typical bog standard R33 rwKw figure and what might it be with the mods from question 3? Depends on the dyno you are getting it done. Some dyno's are "happier" then others. So expect somewhere from 160-180rwkw. Again telling from my experience with exhaust, pod and coilpacks on 7psi my car made 180rwkw. Depends on the condition of the motor etc

Thanks all

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That mesh in the afm is actually there for a reason. I believe its to straighten out airflow before it reaches the resistor wire so it can take an accurate reading. I dont think its really necessary to remove it when it hasnt actually been proven to be a restriction.

Plenty of people have made alot more power with it still intact.

In 'Four Stroke Performance Tuning' by A Graham Bell, it says you can get up to a 2% power increase by removing the mesh.

I agree it is there to smooth out the flow but my thinking is that I have a symmetrical POD filter on the end anyway. The flow is already entering the mouth of the AFM in a uniform/equal way, rather than the OEM airbox where it get sucked in a round a kind of bend and to one side.

So I reckon with a POD you don't need it and my car runs good.:thumbsup:

Nothing wrong with a nice induction sound - it keeps things lively and entertaining.

As for running a side-mount with 12 psi on the stock turbo I don't think that is very good advice at all, especially in a hot country.

Only a fool would buy an R34 SMIC especially if they are gonna get a bigger turbo later.

I agree with the induction note, nothing wrong with a little audio, tho for the next points, 1, don't live in a hot country and in the interests of good throttle response, keeping things as close to Nissan spec as possible should make for comfortable driving. I havent really felt power loss yet and that includes while drifting, so i think the humble SMIC has some undeserved flack. Nothing wrong with big FMIC for high power applications, but this aint that.

and 2, not planning to get a bigger turbo at this stage, so a $40 intercooler upgrade sounds just about right to me.

Heres a related question, is it a waste of money to hook up a FCD with only exhaust and inlet modifications, and boost of around 7-9psi? I remember getting fuel cut year ago on my CA18 Silvia and that sucked.

After I installed an aftermarket ecu and ran 14psi on the standard turbo the r34 sidemount would last about 3 0-80 floor its before it was too hot to touch. Then it turns into an interheater :whistling: I got a frountmount to my door for $220 and a pipe kit for $240. The worst heat I have felt is, the in tank gets a little warm, the core barely gets warm and the out tank stays cold. So for $420 on top of your sidemount upgrade you could have something that actually works well. Oh and fitting was a couple of hours cutting and welding in the shed.

After I installed an aftermarket ecu and ran 14psi on the standard turbo the r34 sidemount would last about 3 0-80 floor its before it was too hot to touch. Then it turns into an interheater :whistling: I got a frountmount to my door for $220 and a pipe kit for $240. The worst heat I have felt is, the in tank gets a little warm, the core barely gets warm and the out tank stays cold. So for $420 on top of your sidemount upgrade you could have something that actually works well. Oh and fitting was a couple of hours cutting and welding in the shed.

This

The amount of cheap yet still decent coolers out there means you can pick up a kit for less then $500

Think of it not as a performance mod (Cause you wont feel much) but more as insurance. Heat is bad, you dont want that

And I'd be more inclined to say expect 130rwkw-180rwkw.

Depending on how harsh your ECU's R&R is will make all the difference. I only made 140rwkw with my stock computer, 8psi, FMIC, Nismo Fuel Pump, Pod filter, 3" Exhaust

In 'Four Stroke Performance Tuning' by A Graham Bell, it says you can get up to a 2% power increase by removing the mesh.

I agree it is there to smooth out the flow but my thinking is that I have a symmetrical POD filter on the end anyway. The flow is already entering the mouth of the AFM in a uniform/equal way, rather than the OEM airbox where it get sucked in a round a kind of bend and to one side.

So I reckon with a POD you don't need it and my car runs good.:thumbsup:

Fair enough. So long as you are happy with your setup, thats what matters.

2% oh yeah right, so thats 6 rwkw of extra throbbing uncontrollable power in 300.

Doesn't sound much but all adds up and it's a 2% which takes 10 mins and is free.

Peeps spends $$ doing head porting and polishing for just a % or two.

Insurance for sure. I would watch my knock levels get unacceptable after a few short bursts with the sidemount. The engine gets cold air now when before it wasn't. Also the bigger core is less restrictive.The boost gauge showed 2 more psi at the manifold after the swap. As stated not so much of a gain but stacks more safety. And for what its worth it looks better :closedeyes:

That mesh in the afm is actually there for a reason. I believe its to straighten out airflow before it reaches the resistor wire so it can take an accurate reading. I dont think its really necessary to remove it when it hasnt actually been proven to be a restriction.

Plenty of people have made alot more power with it still intact.

yep, if the mesh is removed i generally wont touch em.... especially if its gonna make decent power as it increases the reversion through the maf.... they are designed as a slight damper.

yep, if the mesh is removed i generally wont touch em.... especially if its gonna make decent power as it increases the reversion through the maf.... they are designed as a slight damper.

Do you have an evidence to support reversion?

Insurance for sure. I would watch my knock levels get unacceptable after a few short bursts with the sidemount. The engine gets cold air now when before it wasn't. Also the bigger core is less restrictive.The boost gauge showed 2 more psi at the manifold after the swap. As stated not so much of a gain but stacks more safety. And for what its worth it looks better :closedeyes:

Those side mounts are tiny, i remember the difference when i got a FMIC , it was flowing so much that the boost creeped up from 11 to 15psi, ended up having some overboosting problems,( another story)

Edited by SliverS2

I remember reading that the R34 smic is good for flowing around 200rwkw. And I replaced my side mount item with the 34 one because it is slightly larger and had done a few mods to my 33. Its definitely a cheap $50 odd option, but with the mods you are going for its really probably going to be at its limit. I have just bought one of the cooling pro black stealth fmic, and i feel that its well worth it considering it was only $500 brand new. I know from reading on here that my mods will give me roughly 180-200rwkw and i just dont think the 34 smic will be optimal. Plus i plan on a hi flow turbo, upgraded fuel pump and injectors in the future, and the 34 smic definitely wont be enough for that. thumbsup.gif

I'm not sure what that proves or how it means a car will have problems with the mesh removed.

also.... how is soot going to get there? The only thing before that is the pod, so unless your filter isnt doing its job or is an oiled filter depositing small amounts of oil.... I dont see it happening

also.... how is soot going to get there? The only thing before that is the pod, so unless your filter isnt doing its job or is an oiled filter depositing small amounts of oil.... I dont see it happening

Well I don't think any filter is 100% effective so could get sucked in?

Also if you have the re-circ valve and OEM blow-by set up then that all that vents very close to the AFM so you could get some air and crap going backwards through it under the right conditions.

Still I don't see how the mesh is gonna stop it. If the mesh is gonna stop that then it would be a massive impedance to airflow in the other direction also.

I would imagine that cutting that mesh is similar to decatting your cat, its a form of restriction on the exhaust for sure, so the same might apply to the afm....

The mesh would help spread the air out more in uniform pattern compared to having no mesh maybe..but the mesh closest to the turbo could be cut out without affecting that air spread

That would help to make the intake side less restrictive but also add things like a new smooth pipe between turbo and afm and good pod, air box, and cold feed, just like the exhaust has a smooth dump pipe and a decatt is better, same apply to intake???

what do you think?

mythbusters ahoy today

removing the mesh from the airflow meter achieves nothing other than increase the change of reversion

the mesh breaks up the airflow pattern thus avoiding reversion

much like the accordian style pipework does the same job to the compressor wheel

remove the mesh you get reversion, replace the std accordian pipework for perfectly straight 3" steel and you get reversion

the standard r34 SMIC is not suitable for 200rwkw

its a poor core, its too small and it mounted in the wrong spot

after 1 or 2 runs the core is heatsoaked and useless

a front mounted larger core is critical for any decent power level

yes a 34 SMIC will make a single 200rwkw dyno pass

but do the same dyno runs repeatedly with a temperature probe on the core and intake pipework

i bet you see 70+deg intake temp. a FMIC in the same conditions is stone cold at the outlet pipework

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...