Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am having problems with my emanage ultimate. Went to have a dyno tune yesterday and they weren't able to connect to it because they are running windows 7 on their laptops and the emanage requires XP or 98. So i got it home and had a go connecting on an old laptop. Still had problems connecting at first but managed to connect after returning the e-manage to an older firmware version.

Now however the car is running like shit, misfiring and struggling to idle correctly. Obviously something has changed with the emanage settings after i changed the firmware version to do this as the car was in top shape coming back from the tuner's. I cant figure out what though as i dont know what the settings used to be and it is pretty much undriveable now!

also is there a way to disconnect the emanage easily so i can just run off the stock ecu? at least will be able to get it back to the workshop that way and they can have a look at it.

Any help would be much appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367164-emanage-ultimate-problems/
Share on other sites

it has a proper harness if thats what you mean, i didnt install it myself but its been in the car since i bought it over a year ago with no dramas. is there any reason why going back to an older firmware version would stuff up the settings on it?

Just unplug the harness and plug the standardard eve back in as normal.

Pretty sure I had to reload my maps back in after a firmware update. So maybe a bug in the software?

ok will give that a shot in the morning. do you know what settings i could try changing to get rid of the misfire? the maps are still as they were before

Have you downloaded the update? V2.2. http://www.greddy.co...upport/e-manage

It would need the current version loaded. Make sure you have a copy of the map saved.

was going to try that too, except that it already had the latest version of firmware on it when it couldnt communicate, thats why i reloaded an older firmware version back on which allowed it to communicate but screwed the settings

i should probably mention this is also because i dont have the cd, had to download the software off the net and apparently they struggle to communicate when the firmware on the emu doesnt match the firmware on the laptop. hence why i tried the older version

Surely theres someone around with the disk nearby, where are you located? Fresh install, update from greddy and then update the unit.

update: downloaded and updated the software thismorning, successfully updated the firmware and was able to communicate with unit still. the misfire and bad idle problem still remained so had a look at the ignition wiring (which was coming up with errors) and it was out of sequence (1,2,3,4,5,6 instead of 1,5,3,6,2,4). Disconnected the battery and rewired these to the installation instructions and tried starting the car, which did not like it at all! The original sequence was correct even though it was different to the instructions i do not know why! it does say on my ecu that it is a reconditioned one so maybe the ignition wires have changed spots im not sure. Anyway i rewired it back to how it was before and it started fine again, but stil idling bad and misfiring. Ended up giving up and disconected the laptop, turned the car off. Decided to take it for a test drive to see if i'd be able to get it down to the workshop tomorrow and it doesnt seem to be misfiring or idling bad anymore! Dont want to speak to soon tho hopefully it stays good until i get it to the workshop, no idea what would have changed to make it better again!

There were some issues with some of the earlier units regarding the igniter signal I seem to remember, it could be related to that, otherwise I have had issues sometimes when I dont write the data to the emanage after changes on the fly, and occasionally where it wont start after a tune for some reason, it always comes good though.

See how it goes after a few starts. Hopefully its fine now.

i reckon the ignitor chip is damaged, the early ones were to close to the case slides and the board would be damaged upon removal and install. What letter is on the main board? look inside there will be a letter A B C D or later ones are E

e-manages can fickle at the best of times and unfortunately due to the crazy factory R33 (most other cars dont have a timing map that goes from 9-18-5 in one load line) mapping the emanage is not the best solution even if it all runs sweet. We do alot of them and most we've been able to extract with one is around 410rwkw but R33 factory ecu makes it hard to tune nicely... its adequate but far from nice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...