Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Also this might be wrong but I see a lot more blown up rb26s than I do rb25s, could this be due to the higher rpm limit?

this is more to do with the RB26 usually being strapped into a GTR that has 4wd and can generate more sideways g forces than a similarly specked RWD car...

car is running high revs on track, and oil is all up in the head with the sump running low.... 4wd GTR comes out of a corner HARD @ 8000 revs and the slight amount of oil remaining in the sump is thrown to the side and misses the pickup. car gets no oil @ 8000 rpm = bang

RWD car does same thing but doesn't grip as hard an oil does not get thrown as hard and does not miss the pickup, hence RB25 stays alive

So how do the AWD block RB25s neo and non neo differ from the RB26? Many of the Stagea blocks I've seen have interchangeable sump and sump parts with the Rb26.

stag motor is a 25 head on a 26 block/sump setup with all 25 internals....

i just put one into my 33 gtst

Never seen a high powered 25 neo out of Japland.........just sayin

and?

theres plenty here in aust.

Mercury motorsports 700 rwhp stock bottom end neo in VC commo for one thing. however unsure how hard it gets driven.

then theres mine... pushing far more power then stock and gets driven hard at as many track days as possible.

  • 3 weeks later...

bump for this tid bit

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/251820-got-over-400kw-atw/page__st__1000__p__5902568#entry5902568

None, all the technology in the RB26 head is present in the Neo head. Valve/port angle etc. The only benefit the 26 head has is more readily available parts

i have owned 2 R33's, one with S1 engine and the other a S2 engine. when i hit 5500RPM(ish) i get a big kick onwards in torque. i have also driven a NEO RB25DET several times, it feels completely different to drive(obviously because of the constantly variable VCT as opposed to on/off VCT) and has no kick whatsoever. just a much smoother rev range all the way through. can also verify another mate feels the same way about his 34 and notices the difference when he drives his mates sil80 with a 33 RB25DET installed. is this kick coming from vct coming on or off?

also iirc:NEO uses GTR connecting rods to compensate for the smaller combustion chamber.

the neo is a smoother engine to drive. you can thank ECU tuning, the intake runner differences and the turbo differences for that.

fair enough. do not like. i prefer driving a 33 over a 34.

i have owned 2 R33's, one with S1 engine and the other a S2 engine. when i hit 5500RPM(ish) i get a big kick onwards in torque. i have also driven a NEO RB25DET several times, it feels completely different to drive(obviously because of the constantly variable VCT as opposed to on/off VCT) and has no kick whatsoever. just a much smoother rev range all the way through. can also verify another mate feels the same way about his 34 and notices the difference when he drives his mates sil80 with a 33 RB25DET installed. is this kick coming from vct coming on or off?

also iirc:NEO uses GTR connecting rods to compensate for the smaller combustion chamber.

the kick at 5500 is just the standard map in the ecu, at any airflow higher than stock its rich and retarded everywhere on boost but especially around the midrange, sometimes the changes in individual cells are so big its like flicking a switch as you described.

vct is on/off as said. neo just has it activated over a slightly different rev range from memory.

neo does use gtr rods but its nothing to do with the chamber size, they're the same length as 33 rb25 rods. the smaller chamber is allowed for in the pistons.

Edited by JonnoHR31

I wish someone would prove conclusively that Neo chambers were smaller because I've never seen anything to show it .

I know that on some later/last versions of some engines manufacturers went to long reach spark plugs so they could improve cooling galleries around the chambers , do Neos use different style plugs to R33 RB25DETs ?

Anyway I gather Neos use the same sized valves and if pistons are same/similar the static CR must rise if the chamber volumes are less .

What truly gives ?

A .

im pretty sure neo's use same plugs. i use BCPR6ES's in mine anyway.

im with you.. not all that convinced that the chamber is smaller... maybe a slightly different size

As far as I knew it was only the lean-burn RB20's that were marginally smaller (also a redesigned shape)

I wish someone would prove conclusively that Neo chambers were smaller because I've never seen anything to show it .

I know that on some later/last versions of some engines manufacturers went to long reach spark plugs so they could improve cooling galleries around the chambers , do Neos use different style plugs to R33 RB25DETs ?

Anyway I gather Neos use the same sized valves and if pistons are same/similar the static CR must rise if the chamber volumes are less .

What truly gives ?

A .

The pistons are different so this should account for the same static comp but different chamber volumes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...