Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the thing is i want the concaved look but not really wanting to have rims sticking out of the guards. i know the back can have 9.5 but the fronts im still deciding if i should get 9.5 +22 or just get 8.5 +30s =\

Stock R34 GT-R offset is 9J +30. Aftermarket GT-R offset for R34 is generally about 10J +20ish.

9.5 +22 will fit the rear okay but if you wanna play it safe in the front then get the 8.5 +30 and run a spacer for your desired offset.

would a 9.5 +30 fit a r34 GTT? the 8.5 doesnt have the concaved face

wei from vision r said a 9.5 +30 wouldnt fit on a gtt so i just wanna see in person what the 8.5 flat face looks like on a car before i decide unless the 8.5 comes in concaved from some companies?

Well it's not as straight forward as that.

What sized tyre are you going to run? How low is your car? How much camber are you running? Are your guards rolled?

What brand of rim is Vision R quoting you on? Is it the Rota's? And what are all of the sizes available?

Edited by -Jimmy-

I have a R34 gtt sedan and I'm running CR Kais 9.5 +30 all round. There is a bit of concave aswell. The fronts stick in just before the guards so pretty flush and the rears are in the guards but I adjusted the rear camber arms so the rears are pretty close to the guards now. I've got the guards semi rolled(only bent in slightly) and is lowered. I will post pics up tomorrow if I remember. Hope this helps a bit.

what ever you do, go concave fronts and rears, even it out instead of concave rears and the fronts are flatface, looks shit in my opinion.

had the choice of running flat face fronts and concave rears on my s15, decided to fork out abit more coin for concave both for a better finish.

Rims = you keep for awhile so you gotta make sure you're happy with it first time around.

IF fronts don't fit? Camber the mutherf*ker until it does.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
    • As well as being risky WRT tipping off anyway. Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to move. Just measure from the rear one to the front one on the good side, then measure that same length on the wrecked side. You will find the notches in the pinchweld, and the jacking pad. Just spray a spot of marker paint or something there.
    • but any other area than the bulge you are talking about will just cave in then? The front driver side is pretty bent so I don't know if that will work the way it is now. I can still kinda make out where that bulge is/was but it looks like the position of it also changed due to all the mistreatment? Hard to tell
×
×
  • Create New...