Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fair call and that's quite alright if you find him attractive (no homo).

But the lifestyle does go with any body...if that's your ideal then you gotta take the lifestyle with it :P

Fair call and that's quite alright if you find him attractive (no homo).

But the lifestyle does go with any body...if that's your ideal then you gotta take the lifestyle with it :P

I got 99 problems.

Also don't forget it depends on what type of steroid(s) you are using, how you are cycling etc on top of the training and all the other 400 variables involved.

A lot of armed forces people i know have used in the past. Some its obvious, some you would be none the wiser.

So in saying that - Unless you hear it from the guys own mouth you couldn't really confirm or deny as with a good 3-5 years of hard work there is no reason it wouldn't be possible naturally at all. Gotta remember some are luckier than others too with regards to their body, how it responds etc.

Zyzz goes to my gym from time to time, hes 21, 100kgs, <10% body fat...

Yeah hes big, but small compared to his ego haha!

And yes roids for sure..

lol yeah, you don't get to 100kg <10% at 21 with the frame he used to have, without the assistance of roids. Agree with dezz though, he looks like 90 at the most...particularly with that BF percentage.

Even 90 would be a stretch unless he's 6ft+...He's got a very athletic build, and with that shape and at such low body fat, he looks big to people that don't know what they're talking about, because you can see the muscle. But being an athletic build, I'd guess he's around 85kg shredded

Use this as a reference point...Guy on the right is my mate, that's ~100kg...

post-22515-0-72467800-1310369249_thumb.jpg

100kg?

I've seen him at summadayze etc, definitely doesn't look anywhere near 100kg to me...

and pretty sure he's from Melbourne not Sydney...

Hes from Sydney mate, Parramatta area pretty sure, go to his FB page, its got 45K likes.. Wears Bulldogs shorts etc lol

Yeah hes bulked up recently, 100kgs and looks to be 6 foot 3?

Im actually surprised, when ever i see him at the gym, he just poses in front of the mirror taking his shirt off flexing haha, doesnt get much done..

Even 90 would be a stretch unless he's 6ft+...He's got a very athletic build, and with that shape and at such low body fat, he looks big to people that don't know what they're talking about, because you can see the muscle. But being an athletic build, I'd guess he's around 85kg shredded

Use this as a reference point...Guy on the right is my mate, that's ~100kg...

Do you know the girl on the left? Looks like a cutey!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My plan is to go the pink option. But still add the 4th fitting near the oil cap and just cap it off for now.  That way I can add 2 extra to the sump and have 4 dedicated breathers/drains if I ever remove the sump for any reason. 
    • Oh, yeah, look - here's the thing. You always replace the tensioner when you're going in there to replace a belt....under normal circumstances. You want to make sure it is good and safe, and that you don't create a reason to take the front of the bloody motor apart again. But in this case, OP is replacing a belt that has aged out on time, not usage. The belt is a million miles away from aging out on usage. The belt gets a time "limit" merely because it is made of rubber and can degrade naturally. The tensioner? Not so much. I reckon it could last forever on the current usage pattern. So I reckon if the thing is going to continue to get used at the same rate, replacing the tensioner is somewhat gratuitous. Would I replace it if I was doing it on my car right now? Hell yes. Because my car does 10-20 thousand kays a year. So it's all going to be the same thrashedness. Would I YOLO it on OP's car. More than likely.
    • I dunno. I think any one of those from each side to sump is probably enough. Remember - this is about creating a path for gas flow up from the sump to the cam covers. That gas flow then has to leave via the lines to the catch can. There's probably little point in providing 100% more capacity from sump up to covers cf. what you have from there to the catch can. Put in the 3 convenient ones? Any which way that you see fit. That'd be my thoughts.
    • Getting holes drilled into to cam covers and AN10 fitting welded on. My sump has 2x AN10 fittings on it already. These are the options I have come up with that can be done without needing to remove the sump to add more fittings. In all options front of passenger side cover connects to VCT head drain bung (i know this isn't the best spot but my feeling is it must do something). Option 1 (pink). The back of each cam covers gets its own line to sump. Option 2 (blue). The back of each cam covers are linked and share a line to sump. The front of drivers side gets its own line. Option 3 (Black). Drivers side are Tee'd together and share a line to the sump. Passenger side rear gets its one line to the sump.
    • I'd be surprised if Nissan doesn't mention it in the manual as it seems unlikely that a tensioner is going to last 200,000km.
×
×
  • Create New...