Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah dude, if you're going to make a technical statement online. You'd better have your MOFO scientific calculator and text books on hand !

Nah, I'm sorry about the technical rant, just wanted an excuse to draw a pretty picture

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5880966
Share on other sites

*sigh*

Obviously a generic form that they fill out.

Just so as we are clear, in no way am I advocating that I would prefer a "Rotah" over a "Motah" (lol), but I feel you guys needed to understand that not all rotors are without torque.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881150
Share on other sites

Was gonna say...4L displacement and only puts out ~200kw...:sick:

yeah by RTA regulations its classed as a 4Ltr and as we all know jap cars are all restricted to the 206Kw so that doesnt really mean anything either in terms of how good an engine is and what its capable of..........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881271
Share on other sites

yeah by RTA regulations its classed as a 4Ltr and as we all know jap cars are all restricted to the 206Kw so that doesnt really mean anything either in terms of how good an engine is and what its capable of..........

Ahh yeah just read up on the engine classing on Wiki...makes sense now...:blush:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881298
Share on other sites

How many people actually think 206 is a real power figure. Lancer evo states 206 but have been stock dynod at over 300. And my stag did lose against a newish one. Isn't the 206 just a regulation in Japan so they just out that so they can avoid legalities.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881881
Share on other sites

How many people actually think 206 is a real power figure. Lancer evo states 206 but have been stock dynod at over 300. And my stag did lose against a newish one. Isn't the 206 just a regulation in Japan so they just out that so they can avoid legalities.

Stock dynoed at 300HP but not KW.

My old Evo 8MR was 225kw stock. After mods it was close to 300KW at all 4 wheels. TBE, Profec B II ( 1.65bar), Ecu, Fuel pump ect.

I'd be interested to see the stock dyno of the VQ25det, I recon 206-210 would be pretty darn close.

Edited by ArdentEagle
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5882121
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's a difference between "selling" a product to someone (which, if you walked into a workshop or bricks and mortar store and bought and walked out with it, is just the act of buying and selling) and rolling your buggy into a workshop and having them fit non-roadworthy stuff to the car. And for the latter, let's ignore any potential legal loophole arguments that the armchair lawyer might want to make to differentiate between supplying your own parts to be fit by the workshop or getting the shop to supply and fit. The workshops that have been dealt with in the US for this are in the latter category. It would be near impossible to try to charge/attack/criminalise a shop for selling "for off road use only" parts to someone unless those things were intrinsically illegal in their own right, or had other legislation wrapped around them, such as there is for guns, pharmaceuticals, etc. Well, no. And you knew your argument was silly when you made it. And there is. it might be somewhat harder in Vic, but then that's the price you pay for electing the long list of (unts that you have to run the whole shit hole**. But otherwise, you can put an aftermarket or otherwise tunable ECU into a car and get it run through the whole shebang of emissions testing as part of an engineering cert and, so long as the tune is "locked" afterwards, then that modification is on the list that is approved on the cert. But....it is an expensive process. ** Of course, the (unts who make up a large proportion of the population that eternally try to get around the rules are also a part of the problem and the reason that you end up with draconian rules in the first place. By contrast, SA was founded and the government and civil service set up and run by very sensible types (largely German) who set up good structures that enabled a lighter touch of government on the somewhat better behaved population. it is only more recently that we have followed the rest of Australia down the criminal drainhole of penal colony behaviour and now we have to catch up with mobile phone cameras and so on.  
    • Not specifically the revamp Toyos. In the past I've used Nitto NT01s, which were essentially the same compound as R888 with a different pattern (that's what the internetz said, so just be facts). I did like the NT01, progressive fade, didn't go from grip to 0 grip in a split second. If you look at the serious street/track guys, most are either on Cup 2, A052, A050, AD09, CR-S or AR-1.  
    • I have one of these! It is absolutely useless. It provides not nearly enough force on the bolt, it just slips over anything that is not finger tight. And if it's finger tight, you can use your fingers.
    • You have to take photos of the car in Victoria with a timestamp. So if you have big aftermarket turbo in your engine bay, your car is simply not getting a RWC and you'll be doing a lot of returning to stock, and re-modding after about 90 days (because cars that have had a RWC can be audited after the fact). The law I'm kinda ambivalent about. I can see the logic and the writing on the wall, Cobb etc would be well known for selling to 'wink wink off the street usage' but in the real world everyone knows what they do and where they end up. It'd be like someone selling guns in Australia but "only to people who have a proper licence" but selling them outside of Bunnings instead of sausages to anybody. Like RWC's, and VASS's and EPA, this is enforcement of the actual existing rules. I haven't looked into it but there (should) be a way for people to legally pass their tuned car to be within the rules if they can prove they pass emissions laws that are applicable. If there's not then that's another story.
    • Interesting post(haven't watched the vid). I'm surprised companies can be fined for selling products that are specifically meant for certain applications.  How can you force a customer to use or apply your products in 100% the way intended? People have been misusing products since they were invented. Heck, I ate dessert last night with a soup spoon. Does that mean the spoon manufacturer could be fined? And what of the customers who actually want to use the product for its intended use?   I'm sure we could discuss and debate this for a while, but this is an introduction thread and I dont mean to take over it.
×
×
  • Create New...