Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

honestly, I would not upgrade cams in an RB26 to anything without doing valve springs. valve springs get tired and the last thing you want is your 100,000km old springs now having to deal with more lift. so yeah, if doing cams (regardless of the lift - they all have more lift than standard) do springs at the same time.

  • 1 month later...

Unless you want to pull the head off the engine so you can clearence it without worrying about debris falling into the engine, then forget about high lift cams. If it requires clearencing, its far from a drop in affair.

Unless as TO4 says, the cams might use a smaller base circle, which means re-shimming the valves. Not a task for the typical back yarder. A reduced base circle cam runs the same peak lobe height as a 9.15mm cam, but runs the back of the lobe (base circle) at a reduce diameter. Thicker shims are added to raise the bucket further off the valve. This translates to more lift at the valve, with no need for clearencing.

But I really agree with beer baron. 272's should have a step 2 spring and are typically used in engines that rev to 9k. The whole point of longer duration cams is to move the peak torque point further up the rev range. Running 272's with standard springs will give you 2 results.

1. A reduced usable RPM power band

2. A wonky idle.

Add any meaningful level of boost and you start getting valve float with standard spring/standard 8.7mm cams at around 7500. Higher lift and duration will bring that RPM level down considerably.

Edited by GTRNUR

new valve springs should be used. id recomend supertech. cheap and really good. also not hard on the valve train. tomie do +1mm buckets for the 30mm base circle cams. (putting to thick a adjusting shim can have issues)

either way its a $1300 exercise just for the bits, but a nessesary expence) if you are not chasing huge power just get pon cams.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • find it funny everyone claims different fuel chains, do different things with their fuel blah blah blah. We don't have that many fuel terminals in Australia. The fuel tanker trucks drive into the terminal, fill up, and drive directly to the service station and dump out. The majority of fuel you get, is coming out of the same terminals. The variation is actually at the individual service stations and how good their tanks are, as well as how much turn over they actually have. Older fuel stations, that haven't had their tanks replaced are going to end up with the worst fuel. Also a lot of older stations have shit design, and shit maintenance, and end up with more water absorption into the tank. This is when you then get a bad batch of fuel. Other shit things happen, like tanker drivers have a f**k up, and starting to unload the wrong compartment on their truck into the wrong tank. 
    • This one?? In other news: I cannot tell the difference between my red MX5 with the silver grey hard top......... and the Ferrari 599XX EVO, they might as well be twins, well.......apart from the big wang hanging off the back of the Ferrari...🤔🤣, without the wing they are identical   
    • Turn it into the pride flag 
    • I think you'll find we're confused about what you were trying to do and how you were doing it. I would have thought that block rigidity was something you measured while loading the block in beam or in torsion, and that you would do so before and after grout filling, to see if putting material in there created a "composite" construction with the expected rigidity increase. Notwithstanding that the true function of grout is less about gross rigidity than local (ie preventing bore deflection/splitting and tying the bores to the main bearing locations a little better, etc etc). It is nearly impossible to follow your description of what you've done without closing ones eyes and making "aliens" hand shapes in front of oneself to try to follow the manipulations you've made. It's still unclear to me what you were trying to prove.
×
×
  • Create New...