Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day, selling a Motec M48 computer with complete ignition module and map sensor. Was on a GTR before with -7 making 290kw at the wheels, tuned at CRD.

this has great potential for running heavy Hps, Perfect for racing engines and performance upgrade. originally cost more than 4000 with ignition module, now selling for 2500.

any interest, please PM. cheers.

MoTeC’s M48 is a popular,and high end ECU with a lot to offer both road and race applications. Testament to its enduring performance and reliability, it is used as the control ECU in Australia’s V8 Supercar series.

It represents excellent value for a wide range of up to eight cylinder and two rotor applications. Applications up to twelve cylinders are possible using group fire or semi-sequential injection.

The DOS-based tuning software is efficient and easy to use.

Several upgrades are available to increase the functionality of the M48 including traction and launch control, anti-lag and data logging, to name just a few.

BASIC SPECIFICATIONS

Outputs

8 x Injector outputs—high or low ohm

Up to 2 x Ignition outputs—see optional configurations ‡

Up to 4 x Auxiliary outputs—switched or PWM—for functions such as turbo waste gate control, idle speed control, intercooler spray bars, or to be used as additional ignition output ‡

‡ Optional ignition/auxiliary output configurations:

(configurable in software)

2 ignition outputs and 3 auxiliary output

1 ignition output and 4 auxiliary output

Inputs

3 x Analogue voltage inputs—fully configurable including custom calibrations

3 x Analogue temperature inputs—fully configurable including custom calibrations

1 x Wideband Lambda—for Lambda measurement and control

2 x Digital/speed inputs—for wheel speeds and function activation

Communications

1 x RS232

Physical

Case size 150 x 100 x 36 mm

Weight 480 gram

1 x 36 pin waterproof connector with gold plated contacts

I'm interested but what model GT-R was this on and does it come with all wiring ??

Also are there any upgrades installed..e.g traction control, data logging,anti lag,lambada measurement etc ??

mate, be honestly i am not that tech capable to answer your question. this is the compter that came with my r33 gtr that made 290kws, im thinking downgrade it then use the cash to upgrade some other parts. its been tuned at crd and they might can tell u the detailed infor about this thing. mechaic told me this computer is way too serious for people like me, so i decided to exchange the value and pass on the benifits for better use of others. it vame with the wiring and map sensor. thanks.

No worries..I'll give them a bell and see if i can dig up some more info.

I'm looking to replace my HKS F-con but dont want to go backwards using Apexi Power Fc .

I'll see what I can find out and get back to you.

I am not interested in buying this but if the map is locked can a new one be loaded up or would the ecu be locked?

You should probably check and update this thread.

It is a decent price, I bought this exact setup 10 years ago but sold it unused.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...