Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

aaron can you stop with the pointless posting in every thread please. maybe use the chat thread??

mate dont f**king point the finger at me, your the one who post's a lot of pointless shit too. i'm not f**king chuckie or Dirty RS whore for you do dig shit at me.

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

P.S. I am not trying to piss anyone off but it was bought up on the weekend from a new person that it is finding it hard to sift through the crap....and we are all guilty!

Back on subject!thanks.gif

Edited by Jetwreck
  • 1 month later...

hey guys,

more questions from me:

1. what size is the centre bore of M35s?

2. if i wanna get hubcentric spacers, which car would be the same as the M35? i'm taking a wild guess that it's the same as the 350Z

a straight and certain answer would be much appreciatedthumbsup.gif

cool thanks guys...planning to get a set of spacers since i'm gonna buy a set of wheels with high offset

how thick should i go for the spacers? the wheels are +55 offset

Edited by Sydsyd

18x7.5, they are the AUDM civic type R wheels

planning to use 20mm hubcentric spacers so in the end it'll be +35

It's a terrible idea to start out with wheels of such a bad offset; and they're not enough of an upgrade to even get decent sized rubber on.

Wait until you can get something more suitable IMO.

  • 2 weeks later...

got more questions:

1. just lowered the rear 1cm more, now car sit much more flatter, did wheel alignment and got told that the passenger steering arm is bent. question is does anyone have a spare one? if so how much? if not then how do i get replacement other than from stealership/dealership?

2. are there any front camber kits for M35? i was told to get a set if possible as front camber currently sits at between 1.75 and 2 degrees...as much as i like the stance, i'd like to save my tyres from camber wear...

thanks guysthumbsup.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...