Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've decided to remove & sell my Greddy Profec B Spec II boost controller as I'm planing on purchasing an after market ECU with inbuilt MAP sensor for boost total boost control with a 3 port solenoid.

post-55496-0-17568300-1309593178_thumb.jpg

Item: Greddy Profec B spec II

Condition: Near new condition - roughly 6 months old.

Price: $350.00 ono

Location: Melbourne western suburbs - pick up available

Details/specifications: The Greddy PRofec B-spec II is a new electronic boost controller which offers most necessary functions in its compact body.

  • Blue lighted digital screen shows real-time boost pressure. The digital boost meter comes with peak-hold function.
  • Compact boost control solenoid has capacity to control 300 kpa of boost.
  • Boost preset function allows you to set two different boost settings (HI / LO) and choose one of the settings by using a switch. Also the set boost can be turned off if needed to run the engine at the lowest (original) boost.
  • GReddy PRofec B-spec II allows you to set your desired maximum boost, Gain value, Start boost value, Warning value and Limiter value. These values can be set independently on HI and LO mode.

post-55496-0-77803000-1309593164_thumb.jpg

any chance in selling the wiring seperate..i have one and need the wiring ^^

LOL, What use will I have for my kit then?

How about u return the unit who u stole it from and then you can buy my near new kit? lol

LOL, What use will I have for my kit then?

How about u return the unit who u stole it from and then you can buy my near new kit? lol

meh..couldnt care less what use ud have for it..i cut the wires off mine when i sold my old car because i couldnt get them out if you must know.

meh..couldnt care less what use ud have for it..i cut the wires off mine when i sold my old car because i couldnt get them out if you must know.

Mate I was just joking. I apologize if I made you sound like a criminal.

But admit it.... with a comment like what you left.. it was hard not to saying something along them lines. :pwned:

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...