Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What's equivalent to the old 1998-2002 GT-T or GTR skylines nowadays where you get bang-for-buck performance? That's not for 200,000 dollars or for a super-car? A car that is able to be built up and not bought? Something for like 60,000 dollars where mods are not so restrictive? Also a car that can retain the feeling of a RWD / AWD and manual transmission. How about the nissan 370Z? What is a car that has heaps of street credit? Or is there no such thing these days?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370215-new-performance-cars/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The equivalent to an R34 GT-R these days is....an R35 GT-R. When they were new, there wasn't a huge difference between them price wise, hell even the R32 GT-R was $110K when it was sold here new back in 1991.

The FT-86 is the best thing to come along for cheap RWD performance in a long long time. Pity Hyundai chose not to make the Genesis in RHD...

Edited by Iron Chef

Not much new in that class, but there's a few used cars that would fit the bill. Even the 370Z is going to be short on available mods right now, and it's not that quick by modern standards.

If you're talking a GTT type car, its hard to go past the XR6T (or F6) though.

The BMW 1 Series M looks like a fantastic buy if you can stump up the $100K.

+1 to the XR6T (or older F6) for bang for the buck performance with good aftermarket parts support.

Sadly most Jap car manufactures all have seem to have head to the way of Toyota at making A-B eco boxes only these days with 0 aftermarket support.

Obviously they handle like shit stock (xr6t) but has anyone driven/been in one with a decent suspension/brake package? Just wondering if their is anyway they can be built without spending a mint so they can keep up around a track.

Who, apart from Nismoid, said they handle like shit? My friends BA XR8 does an admirable job at slinging through corners at a furious rate. And it's 100% stock apart from a set of Sportmax GT 600s.

I'd say anyone suggesting that XRs don't handle are speaking from a point of sheer ignorance. Sure, there are better handling cars (well, duuuuuur), but skylines aren't entirely lithe until they get the suspension fettled a little.

The equivalent to an R34 GT-R these days is....an R35 GT-R. When they were new, there wasn't a huge difference between them price wise, hell even the R32 GT-R was $110K when it was sold here new back in 1991.

The FT-86 is the best thing to come along for cheap RWD performance in a long long time. Pity Hyundai chose not to make the Genesis in RHD...

Read in the newspaper that Hyundai will be releasing an equivalent soon. But even then its a "Hyundai" - I don't know much about them in terms of hi-po stuff. More as an affordable A-B brand.

Only thing that springs to mind for AWD, turbo with lots of aftermarket stuff, that you can get brand new at a "reasonable" price is an EVO X or to a lesser extent WRX STI.

RWD would have to be the XR6 turbo or entry level Holden VE SS. Lots of aftermarket bits.

XR6 is the bang for buck king at the moment.

Same as the VL turbo was 6-10yrs ago.

Cost vs gain, can't be beat. Just don'texpect to go round corners.

If you want corners, EVO VIII-IX

That's it, EVO!

Or the 370Z, but since I prefer the old-school Zeds, I'd jump to the EVO.

Or save the coin up for a R35 GTR.

Who, apart from Nismoid, said they handle like shit? My friends BA XR8 does an admirable job at slinging through corners at a furious rate. And it's 100% stock apart from a set of Sportmax GT 600s.

I'd say anyone suggesting that XRs don't handle are speaking from a point of sheer ignorance. Sure, there are better handling cars (well, duuuuuur), but skylines aren't entirely lithe until they get the suspension fettled a little.

I've driven my mates BF XR6 from Perisher back to Sydney, and to be honest, when you get in the drivers seat you feel detached from the driving experience, I actually felt nervous going around highway bends at 110km/h. They are big heavy cars that need some assistance when cornering and the power assisted steering is laggy and non responsive at times. Sure they go alright in a straight line and when suspension mods are done, but it's still not the same as a nimble 2dr / 4dr sports saloon similar to the comparisons in this thread.

I've driven my mates BF XR6 from Perisher back to Sydney, and to be honest, when you get in the drivers seat you feel detached from the driving experience, I actually felt nervous going around highway bends at 110km/h. They are big heavy cars that need some assistance when cornering and the power assisted steering is laggy and non responsive at times. Sure they go alright in a straight line and when suspension mods are done, but it's still not the same as a nimble 2dr / 4dr sports saloon similar to the comparisons in this thread.

I would agree, one of my best mates has a BF XR8 that I've driven plenty of times, steering response is woeful and you are at all times very aware of how heavy the thing is. So no "sheer ignorance" here, sure my R33 isn't the BEST handling car around, but it's a hell of a lot better than an 1800kg Falcon.

Yet a stock XR6T would hose a "mildly modded[1]" GTSt around a track. Go figure?

C'mon fanbois. Just because it feels different to what you're used to doesn't make it bad.

Nervous going around highway bends at 110? Nothing wrong with the car, mate. You need some man pills.

I've racked up 30,000 km in probably 50 different XR6's over the last few years, and I can't say any of them have felt sloppy or sluggish handling-wise. They may not be hard core track weapons, but their handling is far from what I'd consider "sloppy"

[1] I assume we're talking about basic mods - suspension upgrade with a bit of engine work, not a full targa spec Skyline in which case it's a pretty pointless comparison.

Yet a stock XR6T would hose a "mildly modded[1]" GTSt around a track. Go figure?

C'mon fanbois. Just because it feels different to what you're used to doesn't make it bad.

"Hose" a gtst around a track? Show me please.

Large amounts of body roll and poor steering response is different from what I usually experience in my car, but it's not bad? Lay off the drugs pal :thumbsup:

warps speaks the truth.

Having just got a new xr6t daily its fast becoming one of my favourite cars ive owned. Cant imagine how fun it would be with mild mods with 300rwkw and 600nm+ of tyre frying torque =p the thing smokes up the rears mid corners with ease with just abit of throttle as it is !

Who, apart from Nismoid, said they handle like shit? My friends BA XR8 does an admirable job at slinging through corners at a furious rate. And it's 100% stock apart from a set of Sportmax GT 600s.

I'd say anyone suggesting that XRs don't handle are speaking from a point of sheer ignorance. Sure, there are better handling cars (well, duuuuuur), but skylines aren't entirely lithe until they get the suspension fettled a little.

Im aware that they are decent on the street mate. You have missed my point all together. The falcon is a heavy family taxi, and i was asking if anyone has modded it so they can keep up around a TRACK with the other sporty type cars being mentioned- Evo's etc. Im not some biased fanboy of either holden or ford, so yes i realize both cars offer decent packages to enjoy your driving experience on the street, however i just think that the weight disadvantage puts them behind for the track, and was simply interested if anyone with actual experience had something to say.

Edit- I posted a video in the wastland video thread for anyone interested in the gtst/gtt vs xr6t debate. Its the only one ive ever seen

Edited by cannabiscorpse

i was thinking about this the other day. what happened to all our silvia's, rx-7's, supras. they all just stopped at once with nothing to replace them.

although has anyone thought about an rx8, there pretty cheap and could go alright i rekon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...