Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On a different slant, do you think there's ever a placebo effect to think that just because a minor service is done, the car goes heaps better? :whistling:

One case in point was the lady who got her car back from the mechanic one afternoon.

Her car needed a minor service.

Then she gets a call from the owner of the service centre asking for her to bring the car in another day because his apprentice didn't get enough time to service her car.

She said, "...but I could have sworn the car went better!"

that could just mean the apprentice left out the air filter or played around with the tuning, something silly like that actually made the car go better but was possibly detrimental to its health/warranty which is why she was called back in

little things can make a big difference to someone in tune with their vehicle..After changing back to a lighter weight oil and getting a slight adjustment to the toe-in on my wifes car it almost feels like it did when we bought again..

before that she was starting to complain it was getting too old cause it didnt feel as responsive and was darting all over the road when it hit a bump..

Its no placebo its our senses telling us it is running better than it was, even if only so slightly..

I have plenty of friends that choose never to service and their cars just get worse and worse

On a different slant, do you think there's ever a placebo effect to think that just because a minor service is done, the car goes heaps better? :whistling:

One case in point was the lady who got her car back from the mechanic one afternoon.

Her car needed a minor service.

Then she gets a call from the owner of the service centre asking for her to bring the car in another day because his apprentice didn't get enough time to service her car.

She said, "...but I could have sworn the car went better!"

I hear what you're saying, a guy at work changes his plugs on his VK V8 every 1000kms because 'it runs heaps better'. I tell him he's dreaming...

I suspect that the biggest factor on my car was the pod filter, it was fairly black with 10,000ks worth of dirt (I actually thought K&N filters were red, turns out they're white and sprayed with red oil). Fresh plugs also results in a stronger spark, ie better burn and more power :)

160$ :woot: could of got a complete service for that with enough change for a 4pack of woodstocks and a packet of horizons..

$160 thats nothing my mum has a holden cruze diesel, her last service by a mobile holden mechanic was like $600--$700.

heres a silly little true story about not servicing your car..

old mate gets a brand spanking new 2005 model ute on lease arrangement, he has never had a new car or even a good car for that matter just keeps buying old bombs until this ute..

gets first service at 5000kms at mazda for warranty purposes .continues to drive the car then gets another service at 40,000kms at some backstreet mechanic.. continues to drive the car..

@ 110,000kms (just out of warranty of course) because of all his rubbish (empty ciggy packs etc) piled up on his dash doesn't see the oil light come on and pretty much runs it dry and all of a sudden clunk clunk clunk..suspected big end bearing..fills it with oil and continues to drive despite sounding like a tractor, drops it at mechanic who thinks he can fix it charges him 600$ to pull some stuff apart but cant find the problem..

however after filling it with some nice thick oil the noise quietens down to an acceptable level and he continues to drive it.

@ 180,000kms its running like absolute shit and wont start at times..i tell him to get it serviced..he replies with "it doesn't need servicing it just wont start" I give up arguing with him over it cause he doesn't want to listen..A week later he rings me stressed cause his car wont start and he has to go to work, I say whatever man get it serviced..he calls a mobile mechanic who comes out and puts new spark plugs in it for the Grand total of..

wait for it..

160$ :woot: could of got a complete service for that with enough change for a 4pack of woodstocks and a packet of horizons..

but this was a temporary fix..he then starts complaining that its using too much fuel, i tell him it probably needs a new air filter hes too dopey to do it so i take him to the servo and blow the dust out with a compressor, he is amazed by his new found response and extra 20km per tank fuel economy.. :laugh:

it rattled its way to about 200,000km before it was repossessed, the only thing that was ever changed on the car was the oil and filter about 3 times then continuos top ups after it went clunk a ,2 sets of spark plugs, 1 set of front brake pads, 2 s/h tyres and 2 old tyres I gave him

which is a pretty good effort really :no:

Ha! good story! wish i had a dollar for each time i have to explain to females that a service WILL NOT fix other problems that the car might have (eg leaking radiator)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...