Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Didn't read anything but posting anyway. 1 point can be lost for almost any reason. If you buy an R34 GTR, chances are you may get pulled over and probably defected. 1 point gone.

they dont give points in melbourne for getting defected buddy

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I've only ever driven fairly quick ones, so my viewpoint is no doubt skewed.

wish the skylines had a closer ration box tbh.

how is it skewed? the speed you will get out of a gear is determined by the gear ratio and rev limit. power has nothing to do with it. you could have a skyline putting out 800hp but if it's running the stock gear ratios and stock rev limit it will do no faster in each gear than a stock skyline. the only exception to this is 5th gear where the stock skyline will probably run out of puff before it hits redline while the modified one would be able to hit redline, but the theorhetical top speed is the same.

how is it skewed? the speed you will get out of a gear is determined by the gear ratio and rev limit. power has nothing to do with it. you could have a skyline putting out 800hp but if it's running the stock gear ratios and stock rev limit it will do no faster in each gear than a stock skyline. the only exception to this is 5th gear where the stock skyline will probably run out of puff before it hits redline while the modified one would be able to hit redline, but the theorhetical top speed is the same.

Yeah I understand how gearboxes work, thanks Lol.

the few I am talking about can and do go above the stock rev limit, in 5th gear, which a stocker more then likely wouldn't do, plus I was more really getting to the acceleration point then anything else.

Anywho, this is circumstantial to the topic at hand man, ASS AND TITTIES, ASS AND TITTIES YEEEEEEEEEEEEEW.

So how come you dont get full points after you have already lost your license? I thought that the 1 point or 3 month option was only if you were about to loose your license, thats what happened to me a few years ago and I just took the 3 month option, 3 months isnt much really to wait, just think of it as a time to save money for your gtr.

in QLD they stick you back on your Ps for a year after you get it back. so 4 pts no alcohol as a starter. trust me I know it well.. if you are a kid then you will lose it again. me I was a bit of a twit for the second one as I forgot to renew mine.

take the suspension learn from it , get so exercise and get in shape. you may look at it as 3 months without a car - I looked at mine as a walk to work every morning and a way to shed a bit of weight :)

NOW if you have not learned your lesson after that then they get a bit more unfriendly and threaten to lock you up.

moral - there is a time and place for being a twit - pick them accordingly and FYI industrial estates are not one of them.

I have been told twice to be a good boy - one for 6 months the other for 1 month. I stick within the limits now and I have little issue.

Im too lazy to scroll up and see who wrote this

I mean really, if your speeding anything over sort of 10 up in a built up area where you cannot possibly predict what is coming from where, you deserve to get hung anyway.

I couldnt agree more. Im still 'enthusiastic' but no way would i do more than 10 or so over in a built up area, Free ways with someone ahead of me bombing along at triple figures then..well, how many here could help themselves? Had about a dozen cases where they got the disco lights while i had time to slow up and trundle by eyes like saucers..good times.

couldnt agree more with above post too, 1 point is just too stressful to drive on. Im shocked i lasted 11 months before getting cocky. still self face palm whenever i think about it.

  • 2 weeks later...

do the 3 months.

twice i picked the 12 months (one by choice, the other due to stupid vicroads), and ended up with pretty much 2 back to back 6 months. was about 4 months in the prelude till bloody police set me up with a driving without seatbelt.. :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cool to see you're on the forum man, think you've met my twin brother a few times (Brent).
    • Yeah...but NA Mercedes V12.
    • Yeah everyone always seems to refer to them as S13 wheels however they came on R32 Skyline, A31 Cefiro, C33 Laurel etc., and also came polished diamond cut or painted depending on the model. Congrats on your GTS purchase! I'd personally leave it NA.
    • In this thing about this 100% renewal energy stuff I hear no one really talking about anything other than power and fuel really Power and fuel, whilst being a huge part of how we use the billion year old Dinosaur juices, are only 2, of the probably thousands of things that we need to use it for in the chemicals industries for making nearly everything we use nowadays I'm all for a clean planet, but if we want to continue to have all the day to day appliances and stuff that we rely on everyday we will still need fossil fuels Whilst I do love science, and how it can bring innovation, there's really a limit to how far it can go in relation to "going green" As for EV's, unless your charging of your own solar panels, it isn't helping the environment when you consider the the batteries, the mining processes required,  the manufacturing process required, and how long a batteries (read: the vehicle) lasts long term If I was supreme dictator of the world, I would ban the use of sugar for fizzy drinks and food additives and use that for ethanol manufacturing, petrol engines would be happier, and people would be alot healthier  Disclaimer: Whiskey manufacturing would still be required, so says the supreme dictator of the world Same same for all the vegetable oils that get pumped into all our food, use that for bio diesel Disclaimer: the supreme dictator would still require olive oil to dip his bread in This would take some of heat off the use of the use of fossil fuels which are required for everything we use, unless you want to go back to pre 1800 for heat and power, or the early 1900's for plastics and every thing else that has come from cracking ethylene  Would I be a fair and just dictator, nope, and I would probably be assassinated within my first few months, but would my cunning plan work, maybe, for a while, maybe not Meh, in the end in an over opinionated mildly educated arsehole typing out my vomit on my mobile phone, which wouldn't be possible without fossil fuels And if your into conspiracies, we only need the fossil fuels to last until a meteor hits, or thermonuclear annihilation, that would definitely fix our need for fossil fuels for manufacturing and power issues for quite some time  Meh, time for this boomer to cook his lunch on his electric stove and then maybe go for a drive in my petrol car, for fun    
    • It really helps that light duty vehicles have absolutely appalling average efficiency due to poor average load. Like 25% average brake thermal efficiency when peak is somewhere around 38% these days. So even a 60% BTE stationary natural gas plant + transmission and charging losses still doing much better with an EV than conventional ICE. And that's before we get into renewables or "low carbon nonrenewable" nuclear which makes it a no-brainer, basically. In commercial aircraft or heavy duty diesel pulling some ridiculous amount of weight across a continent the numbers are much more difficult to make work. I honestly think in 5-10 years we will still be seeing something like the Achates opposed piston diesels in most semi trucks running on a blend of renewable/biodiesel. Applications where the energy density of diesel is just too critical to compromise. CARB is running trials of those engines right now to evaluate in real world drayage ops, probably because they're noticing that the numbers just don't work for electrification unless our plan is to make glorified electric trains with high voltage wires running along every major highway and only a token amount of battery to make it 30 miles or something like that after detaching. Transport emissions is not insignificant especially in the US, but yes there's a lot of industrial processes that also need to be decarbonized. I agree the scale of the problem is pretty insane but EDF managed to generate ~360 TWh from their nuclear reactors last year and this is with decades of underinvestment after the initial big push in the 70s and 80s. I don't think the frame of reference should be solar-limited. France is not exactly a big country either. Maybe it doesn't work everywhere, but it doesn't have to either. We just can't live off of fracking forever and expect things to be ok.
×
×
  • Create New...