Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ever noticed how much room there is between the upper suspension arm and a 17 inch wheel on a 33gtst, not a hell of a lot, i know 18s fit but i would love to know the clearence between said suspension arm and tire of 18 inch wheel.

if reasonably lowered (not to the shit either) + 18" rims + full lock turn.. you'll get rubbing.. which is not good for anything..

if you mainly use your car for nice cruising with the odd fang, you probably won't notice it and 18's are fine. If you push your car to its limits and find yourself locking the steering up on a regular basis, you're probably going to want 17's IMHO.

18in equipped and grinning!

My advice...(for what it's worth) go for the 18's!

Ride is not much stiffer (remember I swapped from 17 to 18 on the same car).

What is all the fuss about?... sounds like short man's syndrome to me:)

18's fit easy, ride is still great, car handles much better, tires are getting much cheaper as time goes on as they get more popular, the whole package was only a few hundred buck more than 17in option, backend feels 100% better, no rubbing, and to put a cherry on top they look way, WAY, better (265x35)...etc, etc.

Wheel choice is very limited though for 18x8 18x9 set up.

I appreciate all the advice and comments.

PB8

snake, youre meant to keep the same or similar rolling diameter, which means that if you have an 18" wheel, the sidewall of the tyre is shorter, giving the same or similar height as that of the 17" wheel/tyre package.  

nemz - sounds good mate.

Yes thats the theory, i havent had a good look at an 18 on a skyline with decent tread, but i have noticed on some other cars that go for bigger rims they still get a slightly larger rolling diameter, only slight

just use something like this calculator to make sure you're within 5% of the original diameter:

http://www.hgeconsulting.com.au/carspeed.xls

As for 17 v 18, I have both for my car and as said above, the 17 tyres are heaps cheaper.

One other advantage not mentioned yet is that generally the 17s are a fair bit lighter than 18s, unsprung weight degrades handling, not improves it....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...