Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I posted this here out of PM's so all can see and possibly understand how to work out a comp ratio.

Before you read on have a quick look at this link those of you who don't understand how to work out a comp ratio, it will help you know what some of the measurements are. http://www.musclemotorparts.com/comp_ht.htm

One not mentioned in the link is deck clearance. This is measured when the piston is at TDC (as high as it will go in the bore) you then measure how far down the piston is sitting from the deck (top of the block)

Squish/quench is the deck clearance plus the thickness of the headgasket. This is not related to compression ratio however it is important as it prevents detonation, increases fuel economy, power and the general efficiency of the engine. Google a little on Quench and or Squish. Lots and lots of info.

--------

The Wiseco catalogue is a little strange in a few area's, which SK also pointed out. The head cc's are a little high (mine cc'd up to 62.2cc) & the final comp they state are .3 of a cr lower to what I work it out to be.

ok on to the specs.

In the catalogue the specified RB30DET pistons have a compression height of 1.260" which is the measurement from the center of the pin to the top deck of the piston. It states the deck clearance is .040" with that setup.

The RB25DET pistons have a compression height of 1.240" which means the piston sits over the rod 0.020". Hence lower in the bore by 0.020".

The builder decked the block by 0.020". Which theoretically means the piston will be sitting in the bore the same height from the deck as what the RB30DET piston would have (0.040"). Am I on the right track?

The head gasket I am using is 100% a .050" Cometic MLS HP. They do not compress once torqued.

When I punch these figures in to my Engine CR program it states I am going to have a 9.2:1 CR!. The builder measured the comp ratio by doing a dummy setup then measuring how far the piston went down the bore or something?!? May his tools are out a little. The squish/quench would obviously be .040" + .050" = .090".

The builder stated I will have an 8.2:1cr. The only way I could have an 8.2:1 cr is if the deck clearance was 0.1" which is 2.5mm down the bore.. Not good for performance & economy. I did a few little drawings. If the piston was sitting 2.5mm down the bore + the 1.25mm headgasket this would have the dome sitting basically level with the base of the head or level with the top of the head gasket. I've pulled a spark plug out and well it doesn't look that way at all.

The more I think about it the more I confuse my self.

Steve, If you read this could you post your details with regards to you headgasket thickness & expected CR? Is it a 1.6mm head gasket which gave u an 8.6:1cr?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37160-comp-calc/
Share on other sites

It's one thing to theorise about clearances and such, and another thing to what the tolerances are when the physical motor is built. With all the manufacturing allowances it's possible to get variations in parts that cannot be accounted for in pure theory. i.e. a deck height .05" more than it's "supposed" to be. This could be due to the the crank centerline being machined on a lower tolerance, the block being slightly larger, or the rods or pistons not being up to their spec etc.etc.

Those "RB30" pistons of Wiseco's are shocking, there is no way a dish of 11cc's can get you anywhere near a decent CR with a twin cam head.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37160-comp-calc/#findComment-744440
Share on other sites

Still 2.5mm (0.10") in total is a hell of a lot when you are talking bearing clearances etc. But then what would I know, I don't build motors.

Yer they are shocker's having a 11cc dished piston.

Only way to find out for sure.

Slap it all down on paper and ask him.

He's easy to approach and makes time to explain things so you are happy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37160-comp-calc/#findComment-744485
Share on other sites

I spoke to Adelaide engine developments.

They did mention the comp ratio gets a little sloppy with GTR pistons in both a RB30 and a RB25.

Once again due to the compression height being a little lower.

The RB26 pistons sit lower down the bore by 0.059" which is around 1.475mm.

Unless you shaved around 1.475mm off the rb25 block with the gtr pistons in it you would have a quench that doesn't work. Hence the engine will make less power, be less responsive (especially down low), use more fuel etc..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37160-comp-calc/#findComment-744812
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
    • Yes correct. Also, I'd avoid applying it to soft paint (however I doubt you'll ever have to deal with it in practice). So any paint that hasn't fully hardened, could be a 1k paint that never fully hardened or it could be a 2k paint that was laid down thick and hasn't yet fully hardened. 
    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
×
×
  • Create New...