Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got a brand new still in box Nismo dash that came with my car but not installed,

When I fitted it the tacho is about 600-800 too high and there is no adjustment, any ideas what to do...?

anyone have a 33 GTR and prepared to pull the dash out and check it on theirs ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371654-nismo-dash-problem/
Share on other sites

An insufficient power or ground will cause a tachometer to actually read too high. If you are experiencing this problem, perform the following:

Using a voltmeter (not a test light), measure across the Red wire and Black wire coming from the tachometer while the engine is running. DO NOT USE AN ALTERNATE GROUND! By doing this, you will be looking at what the tachometer sees for power and ground, combined. If you measure below 12.0 volts, identify which connection is the problem, and correct it.

I found this on the web, not sure how useful it is, but it's probably a good starting point :google:

I found this on the web, not sure how useful it is, but it's probably a good starting point :google:

thanks Paul, I should have thought of that, google has all the answers :thumbsup:

I will try and check that out, finding those wires will be half the battle.. but the odd thing is the standard dash reads normal ??

Maybe the Nismo one is a bit more sensitive ??

thanks Paul, I should have thought of that, google has all the answers :thumbsup:

I will try and check that out, finding those wires will be half the battle.. but the odd thing is the standard dash reads normal ??

Maybe the Nismo one is a bit more sensitive ??

It can quite easily be due to a change in resistance, possible caused by a dry solder or poor connection. This will reduce the voltage available to the cluster, which could explain the higher reading. So I'd also measure the resistance across the terminals on the cluster side, as that is the most likely candidate.

All sorted banana.gif

for future reference : I pulled the face off and then unscrewed the tacho out of the dash, there is a calibration screw on the side of the tacho assembly, so I screwed the tacho back in to the dash, unscrewed the oil pressure gauge out of the dash so once the dash is plugged in I could still access the calibration screw, the rest is pretty simple, start car, turn screw to set tacho at known idle rpm, take dash back out and put it back together and your done sorcerer.gif

now I can see how fast I'm going in 4th gear yes.gif on the track of course thumbsup.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I implied in my post, I have NO idea what the were. But in case I didn't make it clear, the way they performed was brilliant; whatever the brand was. I think it was the compound that made the difference. And if they were Bendix, then sign me up, I want another set. I did drive down mount Ousley (just outside of the Gong) a few times, and they showed no untowards performance.   Its not the low dust that I am looking for NOW. At the time I needed low dust, but now I have no issues with dust but want the initial/early bite of the pads that were used. Yeah, the early cold squeal may of been due to a missing shim or such.  And to repeat, its not the low dust I am seeking, its the initial bite of the pads and increase in bite as  the warmed up during each breaking. As soon as I let off, I don't remember the breaks being extra sticky if I used them again soon after. But I also did not test that theory.   Thanks for the recommendation, But I would prefer to choose something specifically with the behaviour I described.   I assume that they didn't use the default compound off the shelf, as we discussed the dust issue at length. And the early squeal when cold, I have seen the sound is more of an issue with some pad compounds. Mostly ceramic, which also are said to produce less dust.
    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
×
×
  • Create New...