Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Right so here i am studying the rb26 and other engines as a whole.

I sent a request to japan to a good friend regarding the balancing of the bottom end of a rb26dett.

The response i got from the Nismo shop was something like this .

Imagine we have customers who come in daily who request a after market clutch (Nismo Single or Twin plate ) that comes with its own flywheel.

So they replace these daily and have never not once ever had a come back on any of their jobs where the engine runs a bearing etc because of the bottom end becoming out of balance.

So here is the scenario, you get a balanced crank shaft that has been balanced from the factory .

You get a clutch assembly that has also been balanced from factory by nismo or hks or Exedy.

These two seperate articles are balanced in their own right .

Now you get them balanced and matched to each other so that when you assemble the engine you dont have a crank and flywheel that are out of balance that would damage your engine at high rpm.

Never the less you also have the damper fitted when they balance everything .

Then you have your engine running and 25 000kms later because you have beebn enjoying the car and have been launching it just too many times the clutch packs in, you go off and purchase a new clutch system like you would in Japan .

A complete Kit that comes with the flywheel etc.

Now comes the question, do you take the engine out and remove the crank then send off the flywheel and clutch cover and damper pulley to the balancing shop because its what you did the first time ?

Or do you leave it in like most shops would and then fit the new flywheel solid or dual mass with some loctite and let the customer go off and pay your labour cost because you know as long as the flywheel is balanced and the crank is balanced that both should be balanced when assembled ?

This is something that i have been thinking about for a long time and i have been wanting to post the question up for quite a while now .

I have even gone across the net looking for a similar situation to try and see what other owners of straight six engines are doing but havent found anything .

So im asking on here and on other forums, you have the facts and you even have the fact that nismo doesnt follow the practises that we do so why are we doing it then ?>

Should it be done ?

Ok im not sure if i have posted in the wrong section, no responses lol.

Any ways im going to ask if there is any one who can comment ?

OR shouldi move the post to a technical section rather sorry op's maybe posted this in the wrong place please correct me if im wrong .

Thanks

Adam

Those links above are quite helpful mate so you should check em out, but what i would also say is your RB26 gonna be seeing some serious track time,Week end warrior or just a streeter on a hardcore race engine id say yes because at high engine load+high RPM the flywheel/clutch assembly not being balanced with the crank shaft and harmonic/Dampener assemblies will create Crankshaft wobble at high RPM/High speed/Engine load witch isn't a good thing. the RB26 is well known for decent crankshaft wobble at high RPM a harmonic dampener should be invested in after upgrading the oil delivery system in my opinion then the T25's, like it says in one of the articles you should get your pistons, conrods Big end and small end measured and balanced then you can properly balance the crankshaft and harmonic/dampener-Flywheel/clutch assemblies. on a weekend warrior id probably do it to just for piece of mind but if its just a streeter i wouldn't worry about it you wont generate enough High speed/High RPM/Engine loads to cause you problems . One thing to remember to is even though some thing is mass produce doesn't mean there all the same tolerances there is variation from kit to kit and there definitely not gonna be the same as whats in your car currently aslo due to ware on components Fraction of a gram counts when balancing a engine hope this helps you out mate

Edited by KT_87

when i had my engine built, they balanced everything from the front pulley, back to the os giken twin plate clutch. I brought the motor home, the crank had been marked, as well as the clutch where to line them up when installed. If i replaced the clutch, then it would get balanced the same as this clutch was.

when i had my engine built, they balanced everything from the front pulley, back to the os giken twin plate clutch. I brought the motor home, the crank had been marked, as well as the clutch where to line them up when installed. If i replaced the clutch, then it would get balanced the same as this clutch was.

my point is different clutch kits weight different amounts it may only be grams but that's a huge difference when balancing an engine so it'll will need to be balanced as mentioned above what application its it being used for

my point is different clutch kits weight different amounts it may only be grams but that's a huge difference when balancing an engine so it'll will need to be balanced as mentioned above what application its it being used for

im not disagreeing, they balanced mine to something like 0.5g using a hines balancer. Its definitly worth doing to a street engine though as it can help with engine life and fuel economy.

no worries man i wasn't getting ticked off sorry if it sounded like that and I've never thought of it benefiting fuel economy before nice one you learn something new everyday

Thanks for that KT_87 though i am still wondering about this

So we have everything balanced balancer, then crank then the flywheel assembly, then the clutch cover etc.

But here i have a new crank, new ATI damper pulley, new Nismo twin plate clutch coppermix.

So should i be getting this all rebalanced again ?

And now after i get this all balanced, then does this mean that when i do a clutch change job i have to strip the motor, and re balance everything ?

See my theory is this, they say for high performance engines you need to balance the whole rotating assembly, and i agree with this.

But on a high performance engine you would be stripping it more frequently to get everything redone bearings etc, as this type of engine will be running High BHP and also will see track use all the time pretty much .

Now on a streeter like my nur engine is going to be, its going to be a engine that doesnt see much track use, but more street use, the factory rpm rev limit is at 8400rpm .

So the Nur spec engine is finely balanced and through nissan you have the option of ordering a Complete long block assembly, as well as purchasing a Nur spec short block assembly.That is high balanced too ?

And if this is the case would i still need to strip the engine and resend all the parts excluding the ATI damper pulley for balancing ?

This the reason i ask all these questions lol.

Alot to take it i know but its all for peace of mind, and also for the other users of the forum that seek some good solid answers .

  • 5 months later...

just an update .

Sent my crank and Nismo twin plate copper mix flywheel and cover for balancing .

And guess what all was in balance not a thing needed touching .

So this means that a N1 crank if there is such a thing is fine balanced from Factory and the Nismo Coppermix twin plate is also balanced from factory and the two articles together are in balance with each other :)

Brilliant stuff.

Now to balance pistons and rods .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any difference in induction noise?
    • If I got a dollar for every flipped commuter missile I've driven past I'd have two dollars   Some people get into wild adventures on the road and I doubt it's gender or ethnicity specific. I'm just glad I don't usually drive during peak times.
    • Just got the car back and gave it a good run back home Power wise, whilst it only made a extra 5 killerwasps up top at 7200 rpm, it made more power everywhere from 2500 rpm and kept pulling much harder all the way, to the point of me relearning when to shift so I don't hit the 7200 limiter, with the old intake it seemed to take alot more time to rev out, and, throttle response is also much improved  As I didn't want to remove the bumper every time I serviced the air filter (basically every aftermarket and fabricated CAI has the filter behind the bumper) it currently has a hektic exposed pod in the engine bay sucking in hot air, this will be rectified shortly after some some of my CAD (cardboard assisted design) for a alloy heat shield feed by the OEM intake tube behind the bumper, this will cop some wrinkle black paint, as well as the intake pipe for that totally OEM look... The only fly in the ointment was that the OEM "strut" brace doesn't fit over the rear runner of the new intake with the 2.5 engine is in the engine bay, as the 2.5 raises the engine up by 20mm, it's not a war stopper, and I didn't notice any difference without it in some twisties, but....... MX5 Mania is bringing in some GWR "fancy pants" braces that apparently do fit, if it bolts up I'll grab it, it is also stiffer than the OEM one, which is a bonus All in all I'm happy with the outcome      Fancy pants "strut" brace that gives the required clearance      This is where the clearance issue was, the GWR extends out past this
    • Well, I'm back from the dyno today. Some things do partially make sense. The pod filter/airbox delete picked up between 6-10rwkw on 98 - because heat soak does kind of affect things and there was playing with tune/timing/AFR. Oddly enough, the car was running much leaner than before. So lean it was audibly pinging on the dyno which I got video of:   70de0dd5-2099-4a71-8b10-6fc833fb9d59.mp4   We're talking going from ~12.7 in the past to the first run being at like ~14.0. It is now tuned to ~12.5 on the Dyno, which correlates to about ~12.1 on my wideband in the car. These matched last time, which is very odd. The dyno plots only show the dyno's reported AFR - should be last time, yet now it no longer agrees and was way leaner. Nobody has an explanation for how a pod can make the car run notably leaner, yet not really give any more power when you add fuel in. A few different types of intake design were tested:   94c22c34-7991-4902-af85-314b5f5bf352.mp4   There was no difference other than IAT with the pod sticking out of the bay. The pod sticking out of the bay (but connected) is actually still warmer than what I usually see on the road. Removing the pod entirely lost about ~2kw. But to be fair, all of the runs could be argued to vary by that amount when temperatures climb etc etc. It's safe to say that the filter isn't causing any restrictions of any note that can be reasonably altered in any way. This is in line with what I'd expect given the Engine Masters testing. 323KW on 98 and ~335KW on E85 is actually a pretty solid result, up about ~45kw from 99% of LS1 cammed combos, with generally much larger cams/exhaust etc as well. It is after all up 42KW (98) and 54KW (E85) from before. +10KW from a pod and removing the box is cheap as chips compared to what the head work cost per kw No, I did not get to drop the exhaust and test. When it comes to exhaust... it all just seems to change frequencies and cost or gain 2hp here or there. I don't realistically think I'll drop this to test it - because there's not much else I can really do about it/route it any other way/make it bigger/just bought mufflers. Engine masters beat the hell out of headers with a hammer to deliberately kink them and didn't lose power at all, I sincerely doubt that going larger primaries would help. If it were even possible for clearance/conversion reasons... which it's not... I may throw the E85 in there at some point and do a drag run to see what MPH it traps for science. It isn't lost on me that ~320kw Skylines do trap about the same MPH that ~370kw F-Body/Corvettes do in the USA for the same  or similar weight. (122-125mph). Of course, if I go there and trap 104mph or something then I'll just 'accidentally' have an accident on the way home from the drag strip and buy a M4.
×
×
  • Create New...