Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

is that 6 reps or 6 sets?

Whats the point of doing low reps?

I do no less than 10 reps when squatting

6 reps x 3 sets. Atm I'm focussing on strength and size. Every few weeks I'll mix I turn and do higher volume stuff - lighter weight, higher reps.

lol

My legs are defined champ.

I doubt its as chiseled as mine

6 reps x 3 sets. Atm I'm focussing on strength and size. Every few weeks I'll mix I turn and do higher volume stuff - lighter weight, higher reps.

I train my legs no different than any other part of my body, by gradually increasing weight as i see fit with average reps of 10-11. Anything less than 10 reps and 3 sets is inadequate for me but most of the time i do 4 sets especially with squats. This way i get both mass and definition happening all at the same time. The idea of seasonal bulking and cutting up the next is only useful for beginners or hardcore builders, been doing this shit for 8 years now. It was only 8 weeks ago that i was squatting 60kg, however with consistency, last night finished 4 sets (first set 80kg as a warm up, 3 sets in 100kg) with relative ease. Looking into moving on to 140kg in 8-9 weeks time frame.

heavy weights with low reps are just another tool in the box mate.

People respond differently to different training methods, and most people will respond best to doing high reps AND low reps, mix it up.

Having 'big fat' legs or 'chiselled' legs has NOTHING to do with how you lift your weight or how much weight you lift, muscle is muscle, the only thing

that has to do with it is diet.

An ethiopian has chiselled legs dude ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...