Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I forgot to mention that 67% duty cycle was on 98 too by the way....:whistling:

your turbo is prob slightly bigger than mine too manuel so im hoping my injectors will be sweet for 270kw

Do you know what your injector cycle is hitting with 300kw?

  • 5 years later...
8 hours ago, vxsr33 said:

6 year bump.

Is a power fc (r33 gtst) capable of running e85 and flex tune?
I know you need a e85 pump, fuel lines and compatible injectors but what else is needed?

PowerFC can tune for E85 (it's just fuel), but it will not do flex fuel.

But a stock RB20DET with Nistune and the feature pack can control VCT, run full flex, launch control and basic engine protection strategies such as RPM limit vs. coolant temp and max TP Load vs RPM fuel cuts - which a PowerFC cannot do at all.

Sell PowerFC, get Nistune, left over money from PowerFC proceeds to buy a flex sensor.

11 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

But a stock RB20DET with Nistune and the feature pack can control VCT, run full flex, launch control and basic engine protection strategies such as RPM limit vs. coolant temp and max TP Load vs RPM fuel cuts - which a PowerFC cannot do at all.

Sell PowerFC, get Nistune, left over money from PowerFC proceeds to buy a flex sensor.

Nistune doesn't come with APEXi sticker does it? :P

  • Like 1

I didn't know nistune had all those features.
Im tempted to run only e85 as i have a fair amount of e85 stations within close proximity and i have a second car.
Is an fuel flex tune a lot more expensive than a normal tune?
I was thinking of getting an adaptronic if i go flex fuel would this be a good option?
I don't plan any of this soon I'm just trying to gain some knowledge

Adaptronic is a great ECU if you spend heaps of time scaling everything properly, setting up all the tables and working on the timing map to be as near OEM as possible before you start tuning. This is something most tuners don't do because I've seen a good handful of tunes by so called big tuners and they're horrid. 

I'm happy to provide anyone with a very good base map to work with, has all the sensors scaled properly, timing map (off boost) as close to oem as possible and all the cranking tables defined nicely so it starts in any weather. 

However if you're going to send it to a shop, get a Haltech because their base maps are very good meaning your favourite tuner won't need to do much work to make the car drive well.

There was a big thing in Facebook about it a couple of months ago. Shell rep saying that there was basically zero chance of them ever selling E85 at servos in Australia despite them being the supplier for V8 supercars

11 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Adaptronic is a great ECU if you spend heaps of time scaling everything properly, setting up all the tables and working on the timing map to be as near OEM as possible before you start tuning. This is something most tuners don't do because I've seen a good handful of tunes by so called big tuners and they're horrid. 

I'm happy to provide anyone with a very good base map to work with, has all the sensors scaled properly, timing map (off boost) as close to oem as possible and all the cranking tables defined nicely so it starts in any weather. 

However if you're going to send it to a shop, get a Haltech because their base maps are very good meaning your favourite tuner won't need to do much work to make the car drive well.


Would this work with the Modular ECU? 

14 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Adaptronic is a great ECU if you spend heaps of time scaling everything properly, setting up all the tables and working on the timing map to be as near OEM as possible before you start tuning. This is something most tuners don't do because I've seen a good handful of tunes by so called big tuners and they're horrid. 

I'm happy to provide anyone with a very good base map to work with, has all the sensors scaled properly, timing map (off boost) as close to oem as possible and all the cranking tables defined nicely so it starts in any weather. 

 

Hi, I've got an E1280s that Ive written custom code for and would be very interested to see your base map as a starting point for my tuning.

Thanks

Alex

Big thumbs up to Johnny's base map for the adaptronic. Ive been disappointed by tunes from "reputable" places.

Adaptronic's base map can only be described as poo. Retarded poo. At least it shouldn't blow the engine unlike some tunes Ive seen from "tuners".

To Johnny's map, I have added a few more degrees of timing in the cruise area and slightly more on the transition to boost around 93kpa.

However from experience the fuel maps are not comparable, you'll have to do the hard yards with your own afr sensor to set the VE values.

Edited by zoomzoom

Happy to send it to anyone and also my final map on my previous motor that spat out ring lands after a years worth of abuse at 370kW+ on the track (not tune related, motor had over 300k kms, and an average of 1.7bar of boost through it - note completely stock unopened, bar head studs).

I believe you can import the map into the modular ECU, at the very least the the tables you need. 

  • Like 1
11 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Happy to send it to anyone and also my final map on my previous motor that spat out ring lands after a years worth of abuse at 370kW+ on the track (not tune related, motor had over 300k kms, and an average of 1.7bar of boost through it - note completely stock unopened, bar head studs).

I believe you can import the map into the modular ECU, at the very least the the tables you need. 


I'd love to have a copy Johnny if you'd be so kind. I am ordering an Adaptronic Modular soon and just assumed that the Skyline plug n play Modular came with a decent base map, seems not!! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...